Power Generation Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1095-1104.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.23024
• Power Generation and Environmental Protection • Previous Articles
Dongqing ZHANG1, Tiezheng JIN1, Lei ZHANG2
Received:
2023-03-02
Revised:
2023-07-23
Published:
2024-12-31
Online:
2024-12-30
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Dongqing ZHANG, Tiezheng JIN, Lei ZHANG. Comprehensive Optimization of the Cold End of 1 000 MW Ultra-Supercritical Unit Based on Pump Frequency Conversion[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(6): 1095-1104.
入塔水温 | 出塔水温 |
---|---|
26.0 | 22.05 |
26.5 | 22.25 |
27.0 | 22.44 |
27.5 | 22.62 |
28.0 | 22.80 |
28.5 | 22.97 |
29.0 | 23.14 |
29.5 | 23.31 |
30.0 | 23.47 |
30.5 | 23.62 |
31.0 | 23.77 |
31.5 | 23.91 |
32.0 | 24.05 |
32.5 | 24.18 |
33.0 | 24.31 |
33.5 | 24.44 |
34.0 | 24.55 |
34.5 | 24.67 |
35.0 | 24.77 |
Tab. 1 Cooling tower performance data with circulating water flow fixed at 27 600 kg/s
入塔水温 | 出塔水温 |
---|---|
26.0 | 22.05 |
26.5 | 22.25 |
27.0 | 22.44 |
27.5 | 22.62 |
28.0 | 22.80 |
28.5 | 22.97 |
29.0 | 23.14 |
29.5 | 23.31 |
30.0 | 23.47 |
30.5 | 23.62 |
31.0 | 23.77 |
31.5 | 23.91 |
32.0 | 24.05 |
32.5 | 24.18 |
33.0 | 24.31 |
33.5 | 24.44 |
34.0 | 24.55 |
34.5 | 24.67 |
35.0 | 24.77 |
循环水量/(t/h) | 出塔水温/℃ |
---|---|
18 600 | 21.86 |
19 600 | 22.07 |
20 600 | 22.26 |
21 600 | 22.46 |
22 600 | 22.64 |
23 600 | 22.82 |
24 600 | 22.99 |
25 600 | 23.16 |
26 600 | 23.32 |
27 600 | 23.47 |
Tab. 2 Cooling tower performance data with water temperature entering the tower fixed at 30 ℃
循环水量/(t/h) | 出塔水温/℃ |
---|---|
18 600 | 21.86 |
19 600 | 22.07 |
20 600 | 22.26 |
21 600 | 22.46 |
22 600 | 22.64 |
23 600 | 22.82 |
24 600 | 22.99 |
25 600 | 23.16 |
26 600 | 23.32 |
27 600 | 23.47 |
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机2定频泵 | 2机1变频泵 1定频泵 | 2机2变频泵 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
42 000 | — | — | — | 2 640 | 0.800 |
44 000 | — | — | — | 2 810 | 0.815 |
46 000 | — | — | — | 2 992 | 0.833 |
48 000 | 4 988 | 3 256 | 0.758 | 3 183 | 0.851 |
50 000 | 5 005 | 3 404 | 0.782 | 3 385 | 0.870 |
52 000 | 5 017 | 3 575 | 0.809 | 3 598 | 0.890 |
54 000 | 5 023 | 3 769 | 0.839 | 3 821 | 0.909 |
56 000 | 5 009 | 3 895 | 0.871 | 4 053 | 0.930 |
58 000 | 4 966 | 4 218 | 0.906 | 4 293 | 0.950 |
60 000 | 4 903 | 4 463 | 0.942 | 4 541 | 0.970 |
62 000 | 4 828 | 4 722 | 0.979 | 4 798 | 0.989 |
64 000 | 4 862 | 4 998 | 1.000 | 5 068 | 1.000 |
Tab. 3 Influence of frequency conversion and operation mode on water pump power consumption when 2 units and 2 pumps are running
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机2定频泵 | 2机1变频泵 1定频泵 | 2机2变频泵 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
42 000 | — | — | — | 2 640 | 0.800 |
44 000 | — | — | — | 2 810 | 0.815 |
46 000 | — | — | — | 2 992 | 0.833 |
48 000 | 4 988 | 3 256 | 0.758 | 3 183 | 0.851 |
50 000 | 5 005 | 3 404 | 0.782 | 3 385 | 0.870 |
52 000 | 5 017 | 3 575 | 0.809 | 3 598 | 0.890 |
54 000 | 5 023 | 3 769 | 0.839 | 3 821 | 0.909 |
56 000 | 5 009 | 3 895 | 0.871 | 4 053 | 0.930 |
58 000 | 4 966 | 4 218 | 0.906 | 4 293 | 0.950 |
60 000 | 4 903 | 4 463 | 0.942 | 4 541 | 0.970 |
62 000 | 4 828 | 4 722 | 0.979 | 4 798 | 0.989 |
64 000 | 4 862 | 4 998 | 1.000 | 5 068 | 1.000 |
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机3定频泵 | 2机1变频泵2定频泵 | 2机2变频泵1定频泵 | 2机3变频泵 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
56 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 936 | 0.800 |
58 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 121 | 0.811 |
60 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 314 | 0.823 |
62 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 519 | 0.835 |
64 000 | — | — | — | 4 954 | 0.800 | 4 737 | 0.848 |
66 000 | 7 434 | 5 760 | 0.736 | 5 121 | 0.812 | 4 963 | 0.861 |
68 000 | 7 449 | 5 867 | 0.763 | 5 302 | 0.828 | 5 198 | 0.874 |
70 000 | 7 466 | 5 992 | 0.788 | 5 498 | 0.845 | 5 442 | 0.888 |
72 000 | 7 483 | 6 124 | 0.805 | 5 718 | 0.863 | 5 705 | 0.902 |
74 000 | 7 502 | 6 259 | 0.817 | 5 956 | 0.881 | 5 979 | 0.916 |
76 000 | 7 514 | 6 410 | 0.834 | 6 207 | 0.90 | 6 260 | 0.930 |
78 000 | 7 525 | 6 597 | 0.861 | 6 477 | 0.920 | 6 556 | 0.944 |
80 000 | 7 532 | 6 820 | 0.893 | 6 763 | 0.941 | 6 860 | 0.959 |
82 000 | 7 538 | 7 083 | 0.930 | 7 066 | 0.962 | 7 174 | 0.974 |
84 000 | 7 513 | 7 392 | 0.971 | 7 391 | 0.985 | 7 507 | 0.990 |
86 000 | 7 475 | 7 736 | 1.000 | 7 733 | 1.000 | 7 851 | 1.000 |
Tab. 4 Influence of frequency conversion and operation mode on water pump power consumption when 2 units and 3 pumps are running
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机3定频泵 | 2机1变频泵2定频泵 | 2机2变频泵1定频泵 | 2机3变频泵 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
56 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 936 | 0.800 |
58 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 121 | 0.811 |
60 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 314 | 0.823 |
62 000 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 519 | 0.835 |
64 000 | — | — | — | 4 954 | 0.800 | 4 737 | 0.848 |
66 000 | 7 434 | 5 760 | 0.736 | 5 121 | 0.812 | 4 963 | 0.861 |
68 000 | 7 449 | 5 867 | 0.763 | 5 302 | 0.828 | 5 198 | 0.874 |
70 000 | 7 466 | 5 992 | 0.788 | 5 498 | 0.845 | 5 442 | 0.888 |
72 000 | 7 483 | 6 124 | 0.805 | 5 718 | 0.863 | 5 705 | 0.902 |
74 000 | 7 502 | 6 259 | 0.817 | 5 956 | 0.881 | 5 979 | 0.916 |
76 000 | 7 514 | 6 410 | 0.834 | 6 207 | 0.90 | 6 260 | 0.930 |
78 000 | 7 525 | 6 597 | 0.861 | 6 477 | 0.920 | 6 556 | 0.944 |
80 000 | 7 532 | 6 820 | 0.893 | 6 763 | 0.941 | 6 860 | 0.959 |
82 000 | 7 538 | 7 083 | 0.930 | 7 066 | 0.962 | 7 174 | 0.974 |
84 000 | 7 513 | 7 392 | 0.971 | 7 391 | 0.985 | 7 507 | 0.990 |
86 000 | 7 475 | 7 736 | 1.000 | 7 733 | 1.000 | 7 851 | 1.000 |
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机4定频泵 | 2机2变频泵2定频泵 | 2机4变频泵 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
66 000 | — | — | — | 5 301 | 0.805 |
68 000 | — | — | — | 5 501 | 0.814 |
70 000 | 9 552 | 6 813 | 0.754 | 5 708 | 0.824 |
72 000 | 9 611 | 6 958 | 0.771 | 5 934 | 0.834 |
74 000 | 9 670 | 7 117 | 0.788 | 6 170 | 0.845 |
76 000 | 9 723 | 7 279 | 0.803 | 6 411 | 0.856 |
78 000 | 9 773 | 7 447 | 0.818 | 6 665 | 0.866 |
80 000 | 9 804 | 7 615 | 0.831 | 6 927 | 0.877 |
82 000 | 9 836 | 7 781 | 0.842 | 7 198 | 0.888 |
84 000 | 9 865 | 7 960 | 0.853 | 7 488 | 0.900 |
86 000 | 9 897 | 8 145 | 0.863 | 7 788 | 0.911 |
88 000 | 9 911 | 8 339 | 0.874 | 8 092 | 0.923 |
90 000 | 9 928 | 8 557 | 0.888 | 9 412 | 0.934 |
92 000 | 9 942 | 8 796 | 0.905 | 8 745 | 0.946 |
94 000 | 9 959 | 9 062 | 0.924 | 9 092 | 0.958 |
96 000 | 9 977 | 9 361 | 0.946 | 9 454 | 0.971 |
98 000 | 10 000 | 9 688 | 0.968 | 9 823 | 0.983 |
100 000 | 10 009 | 10 049 | 0.992 | 10 205 | 0.996 |
Tab. 5 Influence of frequency conversion and operation mode on water pump power consumption when 2 units and 4 pumps are running
循环水流量/(t/h) | 2机4定频泵 | 2机2变频泵2定频泵 | 2机4变频泵 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
功耗/kW | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | 功耗/kW | 变频比 | |
66 000 | — | — | — | 5 301 | 0.805 |
68 000 | — | — | — | 5 501 | 0.814 |
70 000 | 9 552 | 6 813 | 0.754 | 5 708 | 0.824 |
72 000 | 9 611 | 6 958 | 0.771 | 5 934 | 0.834 |
74 000 | 9 670 | 7 117 | 0.788 | 6 170 | 0.845 |
76 000 | 9 723 | 7 279 | 0.803 | 6 411 | 0.856 |
78 000 | 9 773 | 7 447 | 0.818 | 6 665 | 0.866 |
80 000 | 9 804 | 7 615 | 0.831 | 6 927 | 0.877 |
82 000 | 9 836 | 7 781 | 0.842 | 7 198 | 0.888 |
84 000 | 9 865 | 7 960 | 0.853 | 7 488 | 0.900 |
86 000 | 9 897 | 8 145 | 0.863 | 7 788 | 0.911 |
88 000 | 9 911 | 8 339 | 0.874 | 8 092 | 0.923 |
90 000 | 9 928 | 8 557 | 0.888 | 9 412 | 0.934 |
92 000 | 9 942 | 8 796 | 0.905 | 8 745 | 0.946 |
94 000 | 9 959 | 9 062 | 0.924 | 9 092 | 0.958 |
96 000 | 9 977 | 9 361 | 0.946 | 9 454 | 0.971 |
98 000 | 10 000 | 9 688 | 0.968 | 9 823 | 0.983 |
100 000 | 10 009 | 10 049 | 0.992 | 10 205 | 0.996 |
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | 最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | 最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 4.7/8.3 | 36 000 | 3.5/5.4 | 36 000 | 2.7/3.9 | 35 000 |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 4.5/7.8 | 38 000 | 3.5/5.5 | 38 000 | 2.6/3.7 | 37 000 |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 4.2/7.4 | 38 000 | 3.4/5.6 | 34 000 | 2.5/3.7 | 33 000 |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 4.7/7.8 | 42 000 | 3.7/5.6 | 42 000 | 2.8/3.9 | 42 000 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 4.8/7.5 | 50 000 | 4.0/5.7 | 50 000 | 3.2/4.1 | 50 000 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 4.8/7.4 | 55 000 | 4.0/5.5 | 55 000 | 3.2/4.1 | 53 000 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 5.2/7.4 | 65 000 | 4.4/5.9 | 62 000 | 3.6/4.5 | 60 000 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 5.4/7.4 | 73 000 | 4.6/5.9 | 70 000 | 3.9/4.7 | 68 000 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 5.9/7.8 | 83 000 | 5.1/6.4 | 80 000 | 4.3/5.1 | 78 000 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 6.3/8.2 | 90 000 | 5.4/6.7 | 88 000 | 4.7/5.5 | 87 000 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 6.0/7.7 | 93 000 | 5.2/6.4 | 92 000 | 4.5/5.2 | 92 000 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | 6.9/8.8 | 94 000 | 6.0/7.3 | 93 000 | 5.3/6.1 | 93 000 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | 7.3/9.2 | 97 000 | 6.4/7.7 | 97 000 | 5.6/6.4 | 97 000 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | 7.4/9.2 | 100 000 | 6.5/7.8 | 100 000 | 5.7/6.5 | 100 000 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 7.4/9.3 | 100 000 | 6.5/7.8 | 100 000 | 5.7/6.5 | 100 000 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | 9.0/7.2 | 100 000 | 6.4/7.6 | 100 000 | 5.6/6.4 | 100 000 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 6.7/8.6 | 95 000 | 5.9/7.1 | 95 000 | 5.1/5.9 | 95 000 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 6.4/8.2 | 92 000 | 5.5/6.7 | 92 000 | 4.8/5.5 | 91 000 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 5.2/7.0 | 83 000 | 4.5/5.6 | 83 000 | 3.8/4.5 | 81 000 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 5.1/6.9 | 70 000 | 4.3/5.6 | 70 000 | 3.6/4.3 | 69 000 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 5.1/7.4 | 63 000 | 4.3/5.8 | 60 000 | 3.5/4.4 | 58 000 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 5.0/7.6 | 53 000 | 4.0/5.7 | 53 000 | 3.3/4.2 | 51 000 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 4.6/7.2 | 50 000 | 3.8/5.7 | 45 000 | 3.0/4.0 | 45 000 |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 4.6/7.4 | 45 000 | 3.7/5.5 | 43 000 | 2.8/3.8 | 43 000 |
Tab. 6 Optimal operating back pressure and circulating water flow of Ninghai 1 000 MW unit
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | 最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | 最佳背压/kPa | 循环水量/(t/h) | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 4.7/8.3 | 36 000 | 3.5/5.4 | 36 000 | 2.7/3.9 | 35 000 |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 4.5/7.8 | 38 000 | 3.5/5.5 | 38 000 | 2.6/3.7 | 37 000 |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 4.2/7.4 | 38 000 | 3.4/5.6 | 34 000 | 2.5/3.7 | 33 000 |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 4.7/7.8 | 42 000 | 3.7/5.6 | 42 000 | 2.8/3.9 | 42 000 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 4.8/7.5 | 50 000 | 4.0/5.7 | 50 000 | 3.2/4.1 | 50 000 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 4.8/7.4 | 55 000 | 4.0/5.5 | 55 000 | 3.2/4.1 | 53 000 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 5.2/7.4 | 65 000 | 4.4/5.9 | 62 000 | 3.6/4.5 | 60 000 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 5.4/7.4 | 73 000 | 4.6/5.9 | 70 000 | 3.9/4.7 | 68 000 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 5.9/7.8 | 83 000 | 5.1/6.4 | 80 000 | 4.3/5.1 | 78 000 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 6.3/8.2 | 90 000 | 5.4/6.7 | 88 000 | 4.7/5.5 | 87 000 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 6.0/7.7 | 93 000 | 5.2/6.4 | 92 000 | 4.5/5.2 | 92 000 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | 6.9/8.8 | 94 000 | 6.0/7.3 | 93 000 | 5.3/6.1 | 93 000 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | 7.3/9.2 | 97 000 | 6.4/7.7 | 97 000 | 5.6/6.4 | 97 000 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | 7.4/9.2 | 100 000 | 6.5/7.8 | 100 000 | 5.7/6.5 | 100 000 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 7.4/9.3 | 100 000 | 6.5/7.8 | 100 000 | 5.7/6.5 | 100 000 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | 9.0/7.2 | 100 000 | 6.4/7.6 | 100 000 | 5.6/6.4 | 100 000 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 6.7/8.6 | 95 000 | 5.9/7.1 | 95 000 | 5.1/5.9 | 95 000 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 6.4/8.2 | 92 000 | 5.5/6.7 | 92 000 | 4.8/5.5 | 91 000 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 5.2/7.0 | 83 000 | 4.5/5.6 | 83 000 | 3.8/4.5 | 81 000 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 5.1/6.9 | 70 000 | 4.3/5.6 | 70 000 | 3.6/4.3 | 69 000 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 5.1/7.4 | 63 000 | 4.3/5.8 | 60 000 | 3.5/4.4 | 58 000 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 5.0/7.6 | 53 000 | 4.0/5.7 | 53 000 | 3.3/4.2 | 51 000 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 4.6/7.2 | 50 000 | 3.8/5.7 | 45 000 | 3.0/4.0 | 45 000 |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 4.6/7.4 | 45 000 | 3.7/5.5 | 43 000 | 2.8/3.8 | 43 000 |
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 煤耗率/[g/(kW∙h)] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | ||||||
变频优化 | 工频运行 | 变频优化 | 工频运行 | 变频优化 | 工频运行 | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 294.2 | 301.2* | 289.0 | 298.3* | 295.9 | 303.4* |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 293.9 | 301.5* | 289.0 | 298.5* | 295.9 | 303.4* |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 294.5 | 308.5* | 289.7 | 308.5* | 296.1 | 311.4* |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 293.7 | 296.9 | 288.8 | 292.8 | 296.0 | 298.6 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 293.4 | 293.8 | 288.9 | 292.2 | 297.0 | 299.1 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 293.4 | 296.2 | 289.0 | 291.6 | 297.3 | 299.0 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 293.5 | 294.1 | 289.7 | 290.2 | 299.5 | 300.1 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 293.8 | 293.9 | 290.4 | 290.5 | 301.2 | 301.5 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 294.8 | 295.0 | 292.0 | 292.5 | 304.4 | 305.6 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 295.7 | 295.8 | 293.6 | 293.9 | 307.1 | 307.9 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 295.3 | 295.4 | 293.1 | 293.3 | 306.5 | 307.0 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | 297.6 | 297.5 | 296.2 | 296.2 | 311.0 | 311.4 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | 298.9 | 298.8 | 298.0 | 298.0 | 313.5 | 313.6 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | 299.1 | 299.0 | 298.4 | 298.3 | 314.2 | 314.1 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 299.2 | 299.2 | 298.5 | 298.4 | 314.3 | 314.2 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | 298.7 | 298.6 | 297.9 | 297.8 | 313.5 | 313.4 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 297.1 | 297.2 | 295.5 | 295.4 | 310.0 | 309.6 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 296.0 | 296.1 | 294.0 | 294.0 | 307.9 | 307.5 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 293.9 | 293.9 | 290.4 | 290.5 | 301.2 | 301.3 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 293.6 | 294.1 | 289.7 | 290.2 | 299.7 | 300.1 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 293.5 | 294.4 | 289.5 | 290.3 | 298.9 | 299.6 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 293.4 | 296.0 | 289.0 | 291.5 | 297.5 | 299.0 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 293.5 | 300.8* | 288.8 | 295.5* | 296.4 | 300.5* |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 293.5 | 304.1* | 288.8 | 299.7* | 296.0 | 303.0* |
Tab. 7 Comparison of coal consumption rate of Ninghai 1 000 MW unit with constant frequency operation and frequency conversion optimization of circulating water pump
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 煤耗率/[g/(kW∙h)] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | ||||||
变频优化 | 工频运行 | 变频优化 | 工频运行 | 变频优化 | 工频运行 | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 294.2 | 301.2* | 289.0 | 298.3* | 295.9 | 303.4* |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 293.9 | 301.5* | 289.0 | 298.5* | 295.9 | 303.4* |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 294.5 | 308.5* | 289.7 | 308.5* | 296.1 | 311.4* |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 293.7 | 296.9 | 288.8 | 292.8 | 296.0 | 298.6 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 293.4 | 293.8 | 288.9 | 292.2 | 297.0 | 299.1 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 293.4 | 296.2 | 289.0 | 291.6 | 297.3 | 299.0 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 293.5 | 294.1 | 289.7 | 290.2 | 299.5 | 300.1 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 293.8 | 293.9 | 290.4 | 290.5 | 301.2 | 301.5 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 294.8 | 295.0 | 292.0 | 292.5 | 304.4 | 305.6 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 295.7 | 295.8 | 293.6 | 293.9 | 307.1 | 307.9 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 295.3 | 295.4 | 293.1 | 293.3 | 306.5 | 307.0 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | 297.6 | 297.5 | 296.2 | 296.2 | 311.0 | 311.4 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | 298.9 | 298.8 | 298.0 | 298.0 | 313.5 | 313.6 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | 299.1 | 299.0 | 298.4 | 298.3 | 314.2 | 314.1 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 299.2 | 299.2 | 298.5 | 298.4 | 314.3 | 314.2 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | 298.7 | 298.6 | 297.9 | 297.8 | 313.5 | 313.4 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 297.1 | 297.2 | 295.5 | 295.4 | 310.0 | 309.6 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 296.0 | 296.1 | 294.0 | 294.0 | 307.9 | 307.5 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 293.9 | 293.9 | 290.4 | 290.5 | 301.2 | 301.3 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 293.6 | 294.1 | 289.7 | 290.2 | 299.7 | 300.1 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 293.5 | 294.4 | 289.5 | 290.3 | 298.9 | 299.6 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 293.4 | 296.0 | 289.0 | 291.5 | 297.5 | 299.0 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 293.5 | 300.8* | 288.8 | 295.5* | 296.4 | 300.5* |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 293.5 | 304.1* | 288.8 | 299.7* | 296.0 | 303.0* |
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 节煤率/[g/(kW∙h)] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 7.5 |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 7.5 |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 14.0 | 18.8 | 15.3 |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 2.6 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.4 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.1 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 0 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.4 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 0.1 | 0 | -0.4 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 4.1 |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 7.0 |
Tab. 8 Circulating water pump frequency conversion and cold end optimization coal saving rate of Ninghai 1 000 MW unit
日期 | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 节煤率/[g/(kW∙h)] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 75%负荷 | 50%负荷 | |||
01.01—01.15 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 7.5 |
01.16—01.31 | 7.0 | 67.5 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 7.5 |
02.01—02.14 | 5.5 | 49.3 | 14.0 | 18.8 | 15.3 |
02.15—02.28 | 9.8 | 68.6 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 2.6 |
03.01—03.15 | 14.5 | 59.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 |
03.16—03.31 | 14.9 | 62.6 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
04.01—04.15 | 19.2 | 56.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
04.16—04.30 | 21.4 | 54.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
05.01—05.15 | 24.3 | 56.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 |
05.16—05.31 | 25.4 | 66.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
06.01—06.15 | 25.1 | 62.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
06.16—06.30 | 28.7 | 63.1 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.4 |
07.01—07.15 | 30.9 | 60.5 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.1 |
07.16—07.31 | 31.4 | 59.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
08.01—08.15 | 31.4 | 60.1 | 0 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
08.16—08.31 | 30.9 | 59.5 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
09.01—09.15 | 28.2 | 61.5 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.4 |
09.16—09.30 | 26.5 | 61.9 | 0.1 | 0 | -0.4 |
10.01—10.15 | 21.1 | 54.5 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
10.16—10.31 | 19.1 | 58.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
11.01—11.15 | 17.0 | 69.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
11.16—11.30 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
12.01—12.15 | 11.4 | 70.3 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 4.1 |
12.16—12.31 | 10.3 | 62.0 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 7.0 |
1 | 中能传媒研究院 .中国能源大数据报告(2022)[R].北京:中能传媒研究院,2022. |
Zhongneng Media Research Institute .China energy big data report (2022)[R].Beijing:Zhongneng Media Research Institute,2022. | |
2 | 冯伟忠,李励 .“双碳”目标下煤电机组低碳、零碳和负碳化转型发展路径研究与实践[J].发电技术,2022,43(3):452-461. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22061 |
FENG W Z, LI L .Research and practice on development path of low-carbon, zero-carbon and negative carbon transformation of coal-fired power units under “double carbon” targets[J].Power Generation Technology,2022,43(3):452-461. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22061 | |
3 | 朱法华,徐静馨,潘超,等 .煤电在碳中和目标实现中的机遇与挑战[J].电力科技与环保,2022,38(2):79-86. |
ZHU F H, XU J X, PAN C,et al .Opportunities and challenges of coal power industry in the achievement of car-bon neutrality goal[J].Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection,2022,38(2):79-86. | |
4 | 高恬,牛东晓,纪正森,等 .双碳目标下基于分解-集成的月度煤电需求预测研究[J].智慧电力,2022,50(9):22-29. |
GAO T, NIU D X, JI Z S,et al .Monthly coal power demand forecasting based on decomposition-integration under carbon peak & carbon neutrality goals[J].Smat Power,2022,50(9):22-29. | |
5 | 张兴平,何澍,王泽嘉,等 .不同新能源渗透率下燃煤机组行为策略分析[J].电力建设,2022,43(5):9-17. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.05.002 |
ZHANG X P, HE S, WANG Z J,et al .Behavior strategy of coal-fired units under different new energy penetration rate[J].Electric Power Construction,2022,43(5):9-17. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.05.002 | |
6 | 李政,陈思源,董文娟,等 .碳约束条件下电力行业低碳转型路径研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2021,41(12):3987-4000. doi:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.210671 |
LI Z, CHEN S Y, DONG W J,et al .Low carbon transition pathway of power sector under carbon emission constraints[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2021,41(12):3987-4000. doi:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.210671 | |
7 | 周鑫,程松,任景,等 .含储热型热电联产机组的电力系统源荷联合优化调峰方法[J].电力科学与技术学报,2023,38(5):12-21. |
ZHOU X, CHEGN S, REN J,et al .A source-load joint optimization peak regulation method of power system with heat storage combined heat and power units[J].Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2023,38(5):12-21. | |
8 | 于国强,刘克天,胡尊民,等 .大规模新能源并网下火电机组深度调峰优化调度[J].电力工程技术,2023,42(1):243-250. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2023.01.029 |
YU G Q, LIU K T, HU Z M,et al .Optimal scheduling of deep peak regulation for thermal power units in power grid with large-scale new energy[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology,2023,42(1):243-250. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2023.01.029 | |
9 | 李秀云,严俊杰,林万超 .火电厂冷端系统评价指标及诊断方法的研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2001,21(9):94-98. |
LI X Y, YAN J J, LIN W C .Study on thermo-economics diagnosis method and index evaluation system for the cold-end system in steam power unit[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2001,21(9):94-98. | |
10 | 闫桂焕,顾昌,郑李坤 .300 MW机组循环水系统优化运行的研究[J].汽轮机技术,2002,44(6):345-347. |
YAN G H, GU C, ZHENG L K .Research on optimal operation of circulating water system of 300 MW unit[J].Turbine Technology,2002,44(6):345-347. | |
11 | 赵斌,刘玲,张文兵 .汽轮机冷端优化的研究[J].热力透平,2007,36(1):19-23. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5549.2007.01.005 |
ZHAO B, LIU L, ZHANG W B .Optimization for steam turbine cold end system[J].Thermal Turbine,2007,36(1):19-23. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5549.2007.01.005 | |
12 | 马立恒,王运民 .火电厂凝汽式汽轮机冷端运行优化研究[J].汽轮机技术,2010,52(2):137-140. |
MA L H, WANG Y M .Study on the running optimization for condensing steam turbine cold end in thermal power plant[J].Turbine Technology,2010,52(2):137-140. | |
13 | 王玮,曾德良,杨婷婷,等 .基于凝汽器压力估计算法的循环水泵最优运行[J].中国电机工程学报,2010,30(14):7-12. |
WANG W, ZENG D L, YANG T T,et al .The optimum running of circulating water pumps based on estimated condenser pressure[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2010,30(14):7-12. | |
14 | 赵伟光,刘明远,王丰,等 .国产超临界600 MW汽轮机冷端优化运行方式的确定[J].东北电力技术,2015,36(6):1-3. |
ZHAO W G, LIU M Y, WANG F,et al .Determination of cold-end optimization operation for domestic supercritical 600 MW steam turbine[J].Northeast Electric Power Technology,2015,36(6):1-3. | |
15 | 刘吉臻,王玮,曾德良,等 .火电机组定速循环水泵的全工况运行优化[J].动力工程学报,2011,31(9):682-688. |
LIU J Z, WANG W, ZENG D L,et al .Operation optimization of constant-speed circulating water pumps in a thermal power plant under full conditions[J].Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering,2011,31(9):682-688. | |
16 | 黄新元,赵丽,安越里,等 .火电厂单元制循环水系统离散优化模型及其应用[J].热能动力工程,2004,19(3):302-305. |
HUANG X Y, ZHAO L, AN Y L,et al .A discrete optimized model for the monobloc configured circulating water system of a thermal power plant and its applications[J].Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2004,19(3):302-305. | |
17 | 陈云,李森,赵元宾 .基于凝汽器负挖的电厂直流式冷端系统优化研究[J].发电技术,2022,43(4):655-663. |
CHEN Y, LI S, ZHAO Y B .Optimization study of power plant direct flow cold-end subsystem based on negative digging[J].Power Generation Technology,2022,43(4):655-663. | |
18 | 刘桂生,马骏驰,丁平,等 .循环水泵电动机双速改造[J].热力发电,2008,37(2):66-67. |
LIU G S, MA J C, DING P,et al .Retrofitting electric motor of circulating water pump into a double-speed one[J].Thermal Power Generation,2008,37(2):66-67. | |
19 | 张营 .循环水泵双速改造并联运行经济性分析[J].华电技术,2009,31(11):3-5. |
ZHANG Y .Economical analysis of two-speed reformation and parallel operation of water circulating pumps[J].Huadian Technology,2009,31(11):3-5. | |
20 | 李放 .350 MW 机组中循环水泵电机高低速改造研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2016. |
LI F .Research on high-low speed transformation of middle circulation water pump motor in 350 MW unit[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2016,2016 | |
21 | 瞿伟明 .600 MW机组循环水泵变频改造后运行方式优化[J].发电设备,2012,26(3):183-185. |
QU W M .Operation optimization of the circulating pump for a 600 MW power unit after its frequency conversion retrofit[J].Power Equipment,2012,26(3):183-185. | |
22 | 瞿伟明 .600 MW机组循环水泵高压变频调速系统的工程应用及效果分析[D].上海:上海交通大学,2012. |
QU W M .Engineering application and effect analysis of high-pressure frequency conversion speed regulation system for circulating water pump of 600 MW unit[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University,2012. | |
23 | 沈发荣,赵明,崔海波,等 .循环水泵计算模型及节能分析[J].热力发电,2018,47(3):12-17. |
SHEN F R, ZHAO M, CUI H B,et al .Calculation model and energy saving analysis of circulating water pump[J].Thermal Power Generation,2018,47(3):12-17. | |
24 | 朱艳梅,李士超 .循环水泵采用变频泵及双速泵的调节研究[J].电力勘测设计,2020(7):47-53. |
ZHU Y M, LI S C .Study of circulating water pump with variable frequency pump and dual rate pump[J].Electric Power Survey & Design,2020(7):47-53. | |
25 | 张磊,张俊杰,王顺森,等 .煤基分布式能源技术研究与经济性分析[J].节能技术,2021,39(5):403-406. |
ZHANG L, ZHANG J J, WANG S S,et al .Coal-based distributed energy technology research and economic analysis[J].Energy Conservation Technology,2021,39(5):403-406. | |
26 | 梁占伟,张磊,徐亚涛,等 .高背压供热机组供热温度特性与㶲分析[J].热力发电,2020,49(1):17-25. |
LIANG Z W, ZHANG L, XU Y T,et al .Heating temperature characteristics and exergy analysis for high back pressure heating unit[J].Thermal Power Generation,2020,49(1):17-25. | |
27 | 梁占伟,杨承刚,张磊,等 .基于单耗理论的抽汽耦合高背压供热优化[J].中国电力,2019,52(12):171-178. |
LIANG Z W, YANG C G, ZHANG L,et al .Optimization of steam extraction combined high back pressure heating based on specific consumption theory[J].Electric Power,2019,52(12):171-178. |
[1] | Tingting XIE, Youyuan SUN, Zhen GUO, Mingguang SONG. Summary of Research and Application of Continuous Monitoring Technology for Carbon Emissions From Thermal Power Units [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(5): 919-928. |
[2] | Zhonglin XIA, Wentong CHEN, Shuqiao XU, Zhongsheng WU, Qiang XIE, Shuangchen MA, Jingxiang MA. Application Status and Existing Problem Analysis of the Natural Draft Cooling Towers With Flue Gas Injection Technology in Thermal Power Plants [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(4): 590-599. |
[3] | Ruowei WANG, Yinxuan LI, Weichun GE, Shitan ZHANG, Chuang LIU, Shuai CHU. Summary of Desert Photovoltaic Power Transmission Technology [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 32-41. |
[4] | Daogang PENG, Jijun SHUI, Danhao WANG, Huirong ZHAO. Review of Virtual Power Plant Under the Background of “Dual Carbon” [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 602-615. |
[5] | Ning ZHANG, Hao ZHU, Lingxiao YANG, Cungang HU. Optimal Scheduling Strategy of Multi-Energy Complementary Virtual Power Plant Considering Renewable Energy Consumption [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 625-633. |
[6] | Rongrong ZHAI, Qing WEI, Lingjie FENG, Gexun SUN. Analysis of Energy Consumption Characteristics of Carbon Capture System in Coupled Membrane Condenser [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 667-673. |
[7] | Donghui CAO, Dongmei DU, Qing HE. Summary of Hydrogen Energy Storage Safety and Its Detection Technology [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(4): 431-442. |
[8] | Honghua XU, Guiping SHAO, Chunliang E, Jindong GUO. Research on China’s Future Energy System and the Realistic Path of Energy Transformation [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(4): 484-491. |
[9] | Yang XIAO, Zhiqiang LI, Lin CHENG, Lei TANG, Chao XIA, Ying LIANG, Rui SONG, Dongyang WANG, Hewen LI. AVC Comprehensive Coordinated Control Strategy of Centralized Condenser in Northwest Power Grid [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(2): 270-279. |
[10] | Liuming AN, Jizhen AN, Yifan LIU, Gang XU, Ji LI. Study on Variable Working Condition Characteristics of 600 MW Direct Air Cooling Condenser [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(6): 935-941. |
[11] | Rui DONG, Lin GAO, Song HE, Dongtai YANG. Significance and Challenges of CCUS Technology for Low-carbon Transformation of China’s Power Industry [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 523-532. |
[12] | Xiao YU, Guangquan BU, Shanshan WANG. Research on Transient AC Overvoltage Suppression Strategy of Islanded Wind Power Transmission via VSC-HVDC [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 618-625. |
[13] | Weizhong FENG, Li LI. Research and Practice on Development Path of Low-carbon, Zero-carbon and Negative Carbon Transformation of Coal-fired Power Units Under “Double Carbon” Targets [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(3): 452-461. |
[14] | Hu GAO, Fan LIU, Hai LI. Opportunities, Challenges and Application Prospects of Ammonia Fuel Under the Target of Carbon Neutrality [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(3): 462-467. |
[15] | Hongli JIANG, Yuxi LIU, Yiming FENG, Baozhong ZHOU, Yuxi LI. Analysis of Power Generation Technology Trend in 14th Five-Year Plan Under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1): 54-64. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||