Multi-Power Coordinated Optimization Operation Strategy Considering Conditional Value at Risk

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.23039

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, the power system presents the trend of extensive access of multiple power sources. A multi-power coordination bi-level optimal operation model was proposed. In the upper level model, photovoltaic, gas turbine, energy storage and other power sources were aggregated into the virtual power plant, and the overall dispatching cost of virtual power plant was minimized through optimization. In addition, the conditional value at risk theory was adopted to measure the risks in view of the uncertainty of photovoltaic output. The lower level model was the system clearing model, which took the minimum total cost of the system as the optimization objective. It can consider the virtual power plant, thermal power units and diesel units to participate in the bidding, and output the actual bidding capacity of the virtual power plant back to the upper level, so that the virtual power plant can adjust the power output according to the actual bidding capacity. In order to solve the constructed model, Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition and strong duality theory were used to transform the bi-level model into a single-level model. Finally, an example was given to verify the validity of the model, the results show that the coordinated operation of multiple power sources can effectively reduce the operating cost of the system and improve the consumption rate of renewable energy.

Key words: virtual power plant, multi-power optimization, bi-level model, conditional value at risk

CLC Number:

TK 01

Zhonghao QIAN, Jun HU, Sichen SHEN, Ting QIN, Hanyi MA, Xiaodong WANG, Caoyi FENG, Zhinong WEI. Multi-Power Coordinated Optimization Operation Strategy Considering Conditional Value at Risk[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 781-789.

Figures/Tables 14

References 22

1	KIM W W， SHIN J S， KIM J O ．Operation strategy of multi-energy storage system for ancillary services[J]．IEEE Transactions on Power Systems，2017，32(6)：4409-4417． doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2665669
2	王芸芸，马志程，周强，等．兼顾公平性的多能源合作博弈优化调度[J]．太阳能学报，2022，43(10)：482-492．
	WANG Y Y， MA Z C， ZHOU Q，et al ．Multi energy cooperative game optimal scheduling considering fairness[J]．Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica，2022，43(10)：482-492．
3	张淑兴，马驰，杨志学，等．基于深度确定性策略梯度算法的风光储系统联合调度策略[J]．中国电力，2023，56(2)：68-76．
	WANG S X， MA C， YANG Z X，et al ．Deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm based wind-photovoltaic-storage hybrid system joint dispatch[J]．Electric Power，2023，56(2)：68-76．
4	杨锡勇，张仰飞，林纲，等．考虑需求响应的源-荷-储多时间尺度协同优化调度策略[J]．发电技术，2023，44(2)：253-260．
	YANG X Y， ZHANG Y F， LIN G，et al ．Multi-time scale collaborative optimal scheduling strategy for source-load-storage considering demand response[J]．Power Generation Technology，2023，44(2)：253-260．
5	康俊杰，赵春阳，周国鹏，等．风光水火储多能互补示范项目发展现状及实施路径研究[J]．发电技术，2023，44(3)：407-416. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22048
	KANG J J， ZHAO C Y， ZHOU G P，et al ．Research on development status and implementation path of wind-solar-water-thermal-energy storage multi-energy complementary demonstration project[J]．Power Generation Technology，2023，44(3)：407-416. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22048
6	郭佳兴，王金梅，张海同．基于虚拟电厂的多能源协同系统调度优化策略[J]．电力建设，2022，43(12)：141-151．
	GUO J X， WANG J M， ZHANG H T ．Scheduling optimization strategy based on virtual power plant for multi-energy collaborative system[J]．Electric Power Construction，2022，43(12)：141-151．
7	宣文博，李慧，刘忠义，等．一种基于虚拟电厂技术的城市可再生能源消纳能力提升方法[J]．发电技术，2021，42(3)：289-297． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20104
	XUAN W B， LI H， LIU Z Y，et al ．A method for improving the accommodating capability of urban renewable energy based on virtual power plant technology[J]．Power Generation Technology，2021，42(3)：289-297． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20104
8	何畅，程杉，徐建宇，等．基于多时间尺度和多源储能的综合能源系统能量协调优化调度[J]．电力系统及其自动化学报，2020，32(2)：77-84．
	HE C， CHENG S， XU J Y，et al ．Coordinated optimal scheduling of integrated energy system considering multi-time scale and hybrid energy storage system[J]．Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA，2020，32(2)：77-84．
9	SUN K Q， LI K J， PAN J P，et al ．An optimal combined operation scheme for pumped storage and hybrid wind photovoltaic complementary power generation system[J]．Applied Energy，2019，242：1155-1163． doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.171
10	王晛，吴丙楠，张少华．含风电的综合能源供应商参与投标竞争的多能源市场博弈分析[J/OL]．电网技术 [2023-03-29]．.
	WANG X， WU B N， ZHANG S H ．Game analysis of multi-energy market with strategic bidding of integrated energy suppliers including wind power[J/OL]．Power System Technology[2023-03-29]．.
11	MOHY-UD-DIN G， MUTTAQI K M， SUTANTO D ．A cooperative energy transaction model for VPP integrated renewable energy hubs in deregulated electricity markets[J]．IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications，2022，58(6)：7776-7791． doi:10.1109/tia.2022.3195965
12	吴心弘，潘玲玲，王泽荣，等．能量-备用多品种电力交易下空调负荷聚合商竞价策略[J]．电力自动化设备，2023，43(2)：203-211．
	WU X H， PAN L L， WANG Z R，et al ．Bidding strategy of air conditioning load aggregator for energy-reserve multi-variety power trading[J]．Electric Power Automation Equipment，2023，43(2)：203-211．
13	JIA Y， MI Z， YU Y，et al ．A bilevel model for optimal bidding and offering of flexible load aggregator in day-ahead energy and reserve markets[J]．IEEE Access，2018，6：67799-67808． doi:10.1109/access.2018.2879058
14	卫志农，陈妤，黄文进，等．考虑条件风险价值的虚拟电厂多电源容量优化配置模型[J]．电力系统自动化，2018，42(4)：39-46． doi:10.7500/AEPS20170621008
	WEI Z N， CHEN Y， HUANG W J，et al ．Optimal allocation model for multi-energy capacity of virtual power plant considering conditional value-at-risk[J]．Automation of Electric Power Systems，2018，42(4)：39-46． doi:10.7500/AEPS20170621008
15	MA L， LIU N， ZHANG J，et al ．Real-time rolling horizon energy management for the energy-hub-coordinated prosumer community from a cooperative perspective[J]．IEEE Transactions on Power Systems，2019，34(2)：1227-1242． doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2877236
16	HAN H T， SHEN S C， WEI Z N，et al ．Security constrained distributed transaction model for multiple prosumers[J/OL]．CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems[2023-03-29]．doi：10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.069
50	. doi:10.1023/a:1010650624155
17	FENG W， WEI Z N， SUN G Q，et al ．A conditional value-at-risk-based dispatch approach for the energy management of smart buildings with HVAC systems[J]．Electric Power Systems Research，2020，188：106535． doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106535
18	赵建立，向佳霓，汤卓凡，等．虚拟电厂在上海的实践探索与前景分析[J]．中国电力，2023，56(2)：1-13． doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202208078
	ZHAO J L， XIANG J N， TANG Z F，et al ．Practice exploration and prospect analysis of virtual power plant in Shanghai [J]．Electric Power，2023，56(2)：1-13． doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202208078
19	黄勤坤，邱瑜，王飞，等．考虑多重不确定性的虚拟电厂随机优化调度[J]．电网与清洁能源，2022，38(11)：8-16． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2022.11.002
	HUANG Q K， QIU Y， WANG F，et al ．Stochastic optimal scheduling of virtual power plants considering multiple uncertainties[J]．Power System and Clean Energy，2022，38(11)：8-16． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2022.11.002
20	CUI S C， WANG Y W， XIAO J W ．Peer-to-peer energy sharing among smart energy buildings by distributed transaction[J]．IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid，2019，10(6)：6491-6501． doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2906059
21	CHEN S， CONEJO A J， SIOSHANSI R，et al ．Operational equilibria of electric and natural gas systems with limited information interchange[J]．IEEE Transactions on Power Systems，2020，35(1)：662-671． doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2928475
22	ROCKAFELLAR R T， URYASEV S ．Optimization of conditional value-at-risk[J]．The Journal of Risk，2000，2(3)：21-41． doi:10.21314/jor.2000.038

设备	数值	数值
燃气轮机	最大功率/MW	5.67
	最小功率/MW	2.5
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	3
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW∙h)]	50
储能	最大储电量/(MW∙h)	40
	最大充(放)电功率/MW	8
	充(放)电效率	0.9

设备	数值	数值
燃气轮机	最大功率/MW	5.67
	最小功率/MW	2.5
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	3
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW∙h)]	50
储能	最大储电量/(MW∙h)	40
	最大充(放)电功率/MW	8
	充(放)电效率	0.9

设备	参数	数值
火电机组1	最大功率/MW	500
	最小功率/MW	0
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	50
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	70
火电机组2	最大功率/MW	100
	最小功率/MW	0
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	20
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	60
柴油机组	最大功率/MW	10
	最小功率/MW	0
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	30

设备	参数	数值
火电机组1	最大功率/MW	500
	最小功率/MW	0
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	50
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	70
火电机组2	最大功率/MW	100
	最小功率/MW	0
	爬坡率/(MW/h)	20
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	60
柴油机组	最大功率/MW	10
	最小功率/MW	0
	运行成本/[欧元/(MW⋅h)]	30

场景	概率	场景	概率
s1	0.22	s9	0.08
s2	0.12	s10	0.02
s3	0.02	s11	0.04
s4	0.02	s12	0.02
s5	0.02	s13	0.02
s6	0.02	s14	0.02
s7	0.02	s15	0.02
s8	0.34