Performance Analysis of Combined Medical Waste-Waste Tire Resource Utilization System Based on Gasification and Pyrolysis

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22122

Abstract

Abstract:

Objectives With the annual increase in the generation of solid waste, traditional treatment methods have struggled to meet the increasingly stringent environmental requirements and the demands for resource recycling. In order to realize the efficient utilization of solid waste resources, a combined medical waste-waste tire resource utilization system based on gasification and pyrolysis was proposed. Methods The system fully combined the advantages of plasma gasification and pyrolysis technologies, coupling the medical waste plasma gasification power generation technology with tire pyrolysis technology. The syngas obtained from the gasification and pyrolysis processes was utilized together as the fuel of a gas turbine. At the same time, the high-temperature flue gas produced by the gas turbine provided the heat source for tire pyrolysis, after which the flue gas heat was recovered by a waste heat boiler. While harmlessly treating the medical waste-waste tires, the gradient utilization of energy was realized. The energy analysis and economic analysis of the proposed system were carried out under the condition of fixed feed rate. Results The system is able to achieve a total energy output of 23.59 MW, with a total energy utilization efficiency of 52.56%, which is much higher than the efficiency of conventional waste-to-energy generation. The system has good economic returns, and can realize a relative net present value of 727.978 1 million yuan in a 20-year life cycle, and the dynamic payback cycle is only 3.13 years. Conclusions The research results provide a new technical path for the efficient co-processing of solid waste resources.

Key words: solid waste treatment, energy recovery, gas turbine, plasma gasification, tire pyrolysis, steam cycle

CLC Number:

TK 09

Fuyuan FENG, Tongyu LI, Bo LI, Heng CHEN, Peiyuan PAN, Gang XU, Tong LIU. Performance Analysis of Combined Medical Waste-Waste Tire Resource Utilization System Based on Gasification and Pyrolysis[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(4): 611-621.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1 Diagram of combined medical waste-waste tire resource utilization system based on gasification and pyrolysis

Fig. 2 Simulation models for combined medical waste-waste tire resource utilization system based on gasification and pyrolysis

Tab. 1 Physical parameters of typical medical waste

参数		数值
工业分析	水分质量分数/%	0.32
	固定碳质量分数/%	0.55
	挥发分质量分数/%	99.13
	灰分质量分数/%	0.00
元素分析	碳质量分数/%	81.55
	氢质量分数/%	12.13
	氧质量分数/%	5.74
	氮质量分数/%	0.15
	硫质量分数/%	0.11
低位发热量/(MJ⋅kg^-1)		42.49

Tab. 2 Parameters of plasma gasifier

项目	数值
医疗垃圾进料量/(kg⋅s^-1)	1.00
氧气进口流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.34
氧气进口温度/℃	25.00
合成气出口流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	1.34
合成气出口温度/℃	1 105.14
等离子体火炬热功率%	85
等离子体火炬耗功/kW	1 830
空分耗功/kW	340
冷气效率/%	82.04

Tab. 3 Parameters of syngas at the outlet of plasma gasifier

参数		数值
合成气组成成分	H₂摩尔分数/%	24.29
	CO摩尔分数/%	35.04
	CH₄摩尔分数/%	20.08
	H₂O摩尔分数/%	0.20
	N₂摩尔分数/%	0.01
	H₂S摩尔分数/%	0.05
	HCN摩尔分数/%	0.14
低位发热量/(MJ⋅kg方正汇总行^-1)		30.40

Tab. 4 Physical parameters of waste tire

参数		数值
工业分析	水分质量分数/%	1.50
	固定碳质量分数/%	30.00
	挥发分质量分数/%	55.00
	灰分质量分数/%	13.50
元素分析	碳质量分数/%	75.00
	氢质量分数/%	7.00
	氧质量分数/%	2.70
	氮质量分数/%	0.30
低位发热量/(MJ⋅kg^-1)		34.38

Tab. 5 Parameters of the tire pyrolysis subsystem

参数	数值
热解反应器的温度/℃	580.00
轮胎进料量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.042 3
热解产物的冷却温度/℃	40.00
热解合成气的流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.002 2
热解油的流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.026 1
热解炭的流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.008 3

Tab. 6 Parameters of gas turbine subsystem

参数	数值
空气进气温度/℃	25.00
空气进气压力/MPa	0.10
空气进气流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	40.74
空气压缩机的机械效率/%	99.00
燃烧室进口压力/MPa	1.69
燃烧室出口温度/℃	1 249.51
燃气轮机机械效率/%	99.00
燃气轮机出口温度/℃	591.70

Tab. 7 Parameters of steam cycle subsystem

参数	数值
高(中)压蒸汽温度/℃	543.0(258.0)
高(中)压蒸汽压力/MPa	12.40(1.03)
高(中)压汽轮机等熵效率/%	90.0(90.0)
高(中)压汽轮机机械效率/%	99.0(99.0)
凝汽器压力/MPa	0.004 8

Tab. 8 Energy analysis of integrated system

参数	数值
医疗垃圾进料量/(kg⋅s^-1)	1.00
气化剂(氧气)流量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.34
轮胎进料量/(kg⋅s^-1)	0.04
热解子系统输出的能量/MW	1.42
系统输出的电能/MW	24.32
等离子体火炬耗功/MW	1.83
空分装置耗功/MW	0.32
系统输出的净总能量/MW	23.59
系统的总能量输出效率/%	52.56

Fig. 3 Energy flow diagrams of the integrated system

Fig. 4 Energy utilization efficiency of different systems

Tab. 9 Parameters related to economic analysis

参数	数值
生命周期/a	20
建设周期/a	1
年运行时间/h	7 000
医疗垃圾处理补贴/(元/t)	3 080.03
玻璃样渣的价格/(元/t)	357.10
热解油的价格/(元/t)	776.88
热解炭的价格/(元/t)	471.44
上网电价/[元/(kW⋅h)]	0.65
运行成本/万元	10%总投资
贴现率/%	10
人民币对美元汇率	6.64

Tab. 10 Cost estimation based on empirical formula

部件	成本计算公式	变量注释	来源文献
气化炉/热解反应器	$2.9 × 106 × (3.6 × m) 0.7$	m为物料的质量流量	[13]
换热器	$1632 × A S G C 0.6375$	$A S G C$ 为换热面积	[34]
压缩机	$91526 × (W / 455) 0.67$	W为压缩机耗功	[34]
燃烧室	$48.64 × m a i r 0.995 - P o u t / P i n × (1 + e 0.018 × T o u t - 26.4)$	$m a i r 、 T o u t 、 P i n 、 P o u t$ 分别为空气流量、出口烟气温度、进口烟气压力、出口烟气压力	[34]
燃气轮机	$[- 98.328 × l n (W G T) + 1 318.5] × W G T$	$W G T$ 为燃气轮机发电功率	[34]
余热锅炉	$1000 × [a (Q / Δ T m l) 0.8 + b m s + c m g 1.2]$	$m s 、 m g 、 Δ T m l 、 Q$ 分别为蒸汽流量、烟气流量、传热温差、换热量；蒸发器，a=6.5，省煤器、过热器，a=13；b=21.276；c=1.184	[34]
蒸汽轮机	$6000 × W 0.7$	W为发电功率	[34]
凝汽器	$3000 × (Q c o n d / 10) 0.55$	$Q c o n d$ 为凝汽器放热量	[34]
发电机	$60 × W 0.95$	W为发电功率	[34]
泵	$2000 × W p u m p 0.65$	$W p u m p$ 为泵的耗功	[35]

Tab. 10 Cost estimation based on empirical formula

部件	成本计算公式	变量注释	来源文献
气化炉/热解反应器	$2.9 × 106 × (3.6 × m) 0.7$	m为物料的质量流量	[13]
换热器	$1632 × A S G C 0.6375$	$A S G C$ 为换热面积	[34]
压缩机	$91526 × (W / 455) 0.67$	W为压缩机耗功	[34]
燃烧室	$48.64 × m a i r 0.995 - P o u t / P i n × (1 + e 0.018 × T o u t - 26.4)$	$m a i r 、 T o u t 、 P i n 、 P o u t$ 分别为空气流量、出口烟气温度、进口烟气压力、出口烟气压力	[34]
燃气轮机	$[- 98.328 × l n (W G T) + 1 318.5] × W G T$	$W G T$ 为燃气轮机发电功率	[34]
余热锅炉	$1000 × [a (Q / Δ T m l) 0.8 + b m s + c m g 1.2]$	$m s 、 m g 、 Δ T m l 、 Q$ 分别为蒸汽流量、烟气流量、传热温差、换热量；蒸发器，a=6.5，省煤器、过热器，a=13；b=21.276；c=1.184	[34]
蒸汽轮机	$6000 × W 0.7$	W为发电功率	[34]
凝汽器	$3000 × (Q c o n d / 10) 0.55$	$Q c o n d$ 为凝汽器放热量	[34]
发电机	$60 × W 0.95$	W为发电功率	[34]
泵	$2000 × W p u m p 0.65$	$W p u m p$ 为泵的耗功	[35]

Tab. 11 Cost estimation based on scaled factor approach

部件	参考成本/(×10³美元)	参考规模	规模因子	来源文献
等离子体火炬	1 500.00	5.75 MW	0.91	[29]
1#分离器	33 650.00	4 232.70 kmol/h	0.65	[36]
空分装置	45 700.00	76.68 t/h	0.50	[36]

Tab. 12 Investment cost of each component in the novel system

组成		投资成本/万元
等离子气化子系统	气化炉	4 720.39
	等离子体火炬	350.63
	1#、2#、3#换热器	97.98
	1#分离器	3 603.28
	空分装置	3 833.84
	合计	12 606.12
热解子系统	热解反应器	515.72
	4#换热器	3.02
	合计	518.74
燃气轮机子系统	合成气压缩机	8.92
	空气压缩机	710.38
	燃烧室	53.54
	燃气轮机	6 505.89
	发电机	373.64
	合计	7 652.37
蒸汽循环子系统	余热锅炉	3 534.67
	蒸汽轮机	3 070.76
	凝汽器	116.36
	泵	45.42
	发电机	246.63
	合计	7 013.84
总计		27 791.07

Tab. 13 Economic analysis results of the novel system

参数	数值
年净发电量/(MW⋅h)	155 152.26
年炉渣产量/t	4 536.00
年净发电收入/万元	9 942.57
年垃圾处理补贴/万元	7 761.68
年炉渣销售收入/万元	161.98
年热解油销售收入/万元	51.16
年热解炭销售收入/万元	9.86
年总收入/万元	17 927.25
总投资成本/万元	27 791.07
年运营成本/万元	2 779.10
动态回收周期/年	3.13
净现值/万元	72 797.81

References 36

1	陈刚，于晓东，岳佳妮，等．医疗废物处理处置污染控制标准解读[J]．环境保护科学，2021，47(3)：1-6． doi:10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2021.03.001
	CHEN G， YU X D， YUE J N，et al ．Interpretation of standard for pollution control on medical waste treatment and disposal[J]．Environmental Protection Science，2021，47(3)：1-6． doi:10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2021.03.001
2	WANG Z， ZHU M， HE T，et al ．Chemical looping reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound over two types of oxygen carriers：2CuO-2NiO/Al₂O₃ and CaFe₂O₄ [J]．Fuel，2018，222：375-384． doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.164
3	葛金林，肖海平，闫大海．生物质与生活垃圾共气化过程重金属的迁移转化规律[J]．发电技术，2020，41(5)：552-560． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20060
	GE J L， XIAO H P， YAN D H ．Migration and transformation of heavy metals in the co-gasification of biomass and municipal waste[J]．Power Generation Technology，2020，41(5)：552-560． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20060
4	MARY JOSEPH A， SNELLINGS R， NIELSEN P，et al ．Pre-treatment and utilisation of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ashes towards a circular economy[J]．Construction and Building Materials，2020，260：120485． doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120485
5	PEI S L， CHEN T L， PAN S Y，et al ．Addressing environmental sustainability of plasma vitrification technology for stabilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash[J]．Journal of Hazardous Materials，2020，398：122959． doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122959
6	房德职，李克勋．国内外生活垃圾焚烧发电技术进展[J]．发电技术，2019，40(4)：367-376． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.18234
	FANG D Z， LI K X ．An overview of power generation from municipal solid waste incineration plants at home and abroad[J]．Power Generation Technology，2019，40(4)：367-376． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.18234
7	MONTIEL-BOHÓRQUEZ N D， AGUDELO A F， PÉREZ J F ．Effect of origin and production rate of MSW on the exergoeconomic performance of an integrated plasma gasification combined cycle power plant[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2021，238：114138． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114138
8	KULKARNI B N ．Environmental sustainability assessment of land disposal of municipal solid waste generated in Indian cities：a review[J]．Environmental Development，2020，33：100490． doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100490
9	郑妍，姚宣，陈训强．生物质气化耦合发电体系的合成气组分与能量分析[J]．发电技术，2023，44(6)：859-864． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22164
	ZHENG Y， YAO X， CHEN X Q ．Analysis of syngas components and energy in biomass gasification coupled power generation system[J]．Power Generation Technology，2023，44(6)：859-864． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22164
10	MAZZONI L， AHMED R， JANAJREH I ．Plasma gasification of two waste streams：municipal solid waste and hazardous waste from the oil and gas industry[J]．Energy Procedia，2017，105：4159-4166． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.882
11	MAZZONI L， JANAJREH I ．Plasma gasification of municipal solid waste with variable content of plastic solid waste for enhanced energy recovery[J]．International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2017，42(30)：19446-19457． doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.069
12	OWEBOR K， OKO C O C， DIEMUODEKE E O，et al ．Thermo-environmental and economic analysis of an integrated municipal waste-to-energy solid oxide fuel cell，gas-，steam-，organic fluid- and absorption refrigeration cycle thermal power plants[J]．Applied Energy，2019，239：1385-1401． doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.032
13	BELLOMARE F， ROKNI M ．Integration of a municipal solid waste gasification plant with solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine[J]．Renewable Energy，2013，55：490-500． doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.016
14	PAULINO R F S， ESSIPTCHOUK A M， SILVEIRA J L ．The use of syngas from biomedical waste plasma gasification systems for electricity production in internal combustion：thermodynamic and economic issues[J]．Energy，2020，199：117419． doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117419
15	高哈尔⋅努拉里，李国峰，古丽娜尔⋅图尔逊．废旧轮胎的资源化与无害化技术现状与研究[J]．合成材料老化与应用，2022，51(2)：117-118．
	NULALI G， LI G F， TURSEN G ．Current situation and research on recycling and harmless technology of waste tire[J]．Synthetic Materials Aging and Application，2022，51(2)：117-118．
16	MAVUKWANA A E， STACEY N， FOX J A，et al ．Thermodynamic comparison of pyrolysis and gasification of waste tyres[J]．Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering，2021，9(2)：105163． doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105163
17	蔡杰．基于ASPEN Plus的村镇垃圾热解气化燃烧模拟与试验[D]．杭州：浙江大学，2021．
	CAI J ．Simulation and experiment of pyrolysis，gasification and combustion of village waste based on aspen plus[D]．Hangzhou：Zhejiang University，2021．
18	邢岳，谭浩艺，裴东升，等．直接空冷乏汽提质供热系统变工况特性研究[J]．浙江电力，2023，42(11)：122-128．
	XING Y， TAN H Y， PEI D S，et al ．A study on variable operating characteristics of a direct air-cooling exhaust steam extraction heat supply system[J]．Zhejiang Electric Power，2023，42(11)：122-128．
19	KHOSHGOFTAR MANESH M H， FIROUZI P， KABIRI S，et al ．Evaluation of power and freshwater production based on integrated gas turbine，S-CO₂，and ORC cycles with RO desalination unit[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2021，228：113607． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113607
20	ERDOGAN A A， YILMAZOGLU M Z ．Plasma gasification of the medical waste[J]．International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2021，46(57)：29108-29125． doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.069
21	MINUTILLO M， PERNA A， DI BONA D ．Modelling and performance analysis of an integrated plasma gasification combined cycle (IPGCC) power plant[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2009，50(11)：2837-2842． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.07.002
22	ISMAIL H Y， ABBAS A， AZIZI F，et al ．Pyrolysis of waste tires：a modeling and parameter estimation study using Aspen Plus®[J]．Waste Management，2017，60：482-493． doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.024
23	TAJIK MANSOURI M， AHMADI P， GANJEH KAVIRI A，et al ．Exergetic and economic evaluation of the effect of HRSG configurations on the performance of combined cycle power plants[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2012，58：47-58． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2011.12.020
24	VILARDI G， VERDONE N ．Exergy analysis of municipal solid waste incineration processes：the use of O 2 - enriched air and the oxy-combustion process[J]．Energy，2022，239：122147． doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122147
25	GALENO G， MINUTILLO M， PERNA A ．From waste to electricity through integrated plasma gasification/fuel cell (IPGFC) system[J]．International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2011，36(2)：1692-1701． doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.008
26	MINUTILLO M， PERNA A， DI BONA D ．Modelling and performance analysis of an integrated plasma gasification combined cycle (IPGCC) power plant[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2009，50(11)：2837-2842． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.07.002
27	LAI H， HARUN N F， TUCKER D，et al ．Design and eco-technoeconomic analyses of SOFC/GT hybrid systems accounting for long-term degradation effects[J]．International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2021，46(7)：5612-5629． doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.032
28	ALNOUSS A， MCKAY G， AL-ANSARI T ．A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2019，196：664-676． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.019
29	PENG W， CHEN H， LIU J，et al ．Techno-economic assessment of a conceptual waste-to-energy CHP system combining plasma gasification，SOFC，gas turbine and supercritical CO₂ cycle[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2021，245：114622． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114622
30	CHEN H， LI J， LI T，et al ．Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant[J]．Energy，2022，245：123156． doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123156
31	ZHANG Z， DELCROIX B， REZAZGUI O，et al ．Simulation and techno-economic assessment of bio-methanol production from pine biomass，biochar and pyrolysis oil[J]．Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments，2021，44：101002． doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101002
32	彭维珂，李童宇，武浩然，等．基于医疗垃圾等离子气化的零碳高效热电联产系统性能分析[J]．中国电机工程学报，2022，42(9)：3135-3151． doi:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.212683
	PENG W K， LI T Y， WU H R，et al ． Performance assessment of a zero-carbon emission waste-to-energy CHP hybrid system based on plasma gasification[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2022，42(9)：3135-3151． doi:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.212683
33	DINCA C， SLAVU N， CORMOŞ C C，et al ．CO₂ capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process[J]．Energy，2018，149：925-936． doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.109
34	MONTIEL-BOHÓRQUEZ N D， AGUDELO A F， PÉREZ J F ．Effect of origin and production rate of MSW on the exergoeconomic performance of an integrated plasma gasification combined cycle power plant[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2021，238：114138． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114138
35	NAMI H， MAHMOUDI S M S， NEMATI A ．Exergy，economic and environmental impact assessment and optimization of a novel cogeneration system including a gas turbine，a supercritical CO₂ and an organic Rankine cycle (GT-HRSG/SCO₂)[J]．Applied Thermal Engineering，2017，110：1315-1330． doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.197
36	QIN Z， TANG Y， ZHANG Z，et al ．Techno-economic-environmental analysis of coal-based methanol and power poly-generation system integrated with biomass co-gasification and solar based hydrogen addition[J]．Energy Conversion and Management，2021，228：113646． doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113646

[1]	Zeyang CUI, Xiangling KONG, Jinglun FU, Jiajun SHI. An Image-Based Turbine Blade Parameter Inspection Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 106-112.
[2]	Yang YANG, Yaoqiang LI, Jinqi ZHANG. Design of Dome Structure for A Lean Premixed Swirled Combustor of Gas Turbine Based on the Numerical Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 712-721.
[3]	Yang YANG, Desan GUO, Yaoqiang LI, Jinqi ZHANG. Design of Lean Premixed Multi-Swirl Combustor Dome Structure for Gas Turbine [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(2): 183-192.
[4]	Hongyi ZHANG, Litao QU. Research and Application of Numerical Simulation for Selective Catalytic Reduction Denitration of 9F Gas Turbine [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(1): 78-84.
[5]	Jiangang HAO, Wenming GONG, Yang DING, Danwei ZHENG, Yong LIU. Analysis on Combustion Instability Characteristics of Model Swirl Combustor With Gas Fuel [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(6): 927-934.
[6]	Yunfeng JIN, Chao LIU, Gaofeng DENG, Yunlong GUAN, Jiangang HAO, Haizhou HUANG, Dongxiang JIANG. Cost Benefit Analysis for Maintenance Strategy of Gas Turbine Inlet Filtration System [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1): 119-125.
[7]	Mingliang BAI, Dongxue ZHANG, Jinfu LIU, Jiao LIU, Daren YU. Anomaly Detection of Gas Turbine Hot Components Based on Deep Autoencoder and Support Vector Data Description [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 422-430.
[8]	Xiangling KONG, Jinglun FU. Computer-Vision Based on Three-dimensional Reconstruction Technology and Its Applications in Gas Turbine Industry [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 454-463.
[9]	Bin QIU, Jinglun FU. Research Status of Gas Turbine Exhaust Diffuser [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 437-446.
[10]	Kai WEI, Zhong LUO, Yonghang SUN, Yu WANG. Analysis of Internal Flow Characteristics of Gas Turbine Ejector Mixer with Valve Plate [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 431-436.
[11]	Hua ZHU, Biao YAN, Yusong LIU, Liang LI. Study on Humid Air Turbine Cooling Technique [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 412-421.
[12]	Jin GUAN, Zongze HE, Xiaojing LÜ, Yiwu WENG. Experimental Study on Startup of 30kW Micro Gas Turbine Generator Set [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 404-411.
[13]	Yunfeng JIN, Chao LIU, Gaofeng DENG, Yunlong GUAN, Xin TIAN, Haizhou HUANG, Dongxiang JIANG. Research on Modeling Method of Gas Turbine Inlet Pressure Loss [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 395-403.
[14]	Youhua HUANG, Shanwei MA, Ji LIU, Zhenghua WU. Optimization Design and Engineering Application of Gas Turbine SCR Denitrification System [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(3): 350-356.
[15]	Kejia HU, Jun ZHANG, Tianyu ZHANG, Lixin GAO. Harmonic Analysis of H Class Gas Turbine Generator Starting With Static Frequency Converter Based on Matlab/Simulink Simulation [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(6): 697-705.