Power Generation Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 496-507.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.24074
• Application of AI in New Power System • Previous Articles
Sucheng LIU1,2, Li LUAN1,2, Long LI1,2, Tao HONG1,2, Xiaodong LIU1,2
Received:2024-12-22
Revised:2025-02-05
Published:2025-06-30
Online:2025-06-16
Supported by:CLC Number:
Sucheng LIU, Li LUAN, Long LI, Tao HONG, Xiaodong LIU. Research on Large-Signal Stability Assessment Methods of DC Microgrids Based on Artificial Intelligence[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 496-507.
| 参数 | 数值 |
|---|---|
变换器输出电容Coj /mF 变换器电阻rj /Ω 变换器电感Lj /mH 线路电阻roj /Ω 线路电感Loj /mH 母线电容Cbus /mF 二次控制环路PI参数Kpllj,Killj 本地控制电压环PI参数Kpvj,Kivj 本地控制电流环PI参数Kpcj,Kicj 下垂系数Rdj | 1.5~2.5 0.02 1 0.01~0.03 0.3~0.5 1.5~2.2 0.1~0.9, 20 0.1~0.9, 40 0.5, 50 0.05~0.20 |
Tab. 1 Main parameters of DC microgrid’s main circuit
| 参数 | 数值 |
|---|---|
变换器输出电容Coj /mF 变换器电阻rj /Ω 变换器电感Lj /mH 线路电阻roj /Ω 线路电感Loj /mH 母线电容Cbus /mF 二次控制环路PI参数Kpllj,Killj 本地控制电压环PI参数Kpvj,Kivj 本地控制电流环PI参数Kpcj,Kicj 下垂系数Rdj | 1.5~2.5 0.02 1 0.01~0.03 0.3~0.5 1.5~2.2 0.1~0.9, 20 0.1~0.9, 40 0.5, 50 0.05~0.20 |
| 分类器 | 实际状态 | 预测状态 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 不稳定数量/个 | 稳定数量/个 | ||
| DT | 不稳定 | 274 | 18 |
| 稳定 | 27 | 203 | |
| RF | 不稳定 | 276 | 16 |
| 稳定 | 18 | 212 | |
| ET | 不稳定 | 276 | 16 |
| 稳定 | 12 | 218 | |
| SVM | 不稳定 | 288 | 4 |
| 稳定 | 2 | 228 | |
| ANN | 不稳定 | 290 | 2 |
| 稳定 | 5 | 225 | |
| LSTM | 不稳定 | 291 | 1 |
| 稳定 | 4 | 226 | |
Tab. 2 Confusion matrix of each classifier
| 分类器 | 实际状态 | 预测状态 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 不稳定数量/个 | 稳定数量/个 | ||
| DT | 不稳定 | 274 | 18 |
| 稳定 | 27 | 203 | |
| RF | 不稳定 | 276 | 16 |
| 稳定 | 18 | 212 | |
| ET | 不稳定 | 276 | 16 |
| 稳定 | 12 | 218 | |
| SVM | 不稳定 | 288 | 4 |
| 稳定 | 2 | 228 | |
| ANN | 不稳定 | 290 | 2 |
| 稳定 | 5 | 225 | |
| LSTM | 不稳定 | 291 | 1 |
| 稳定 | 4 | 226 | |
| 指标 | 分类器 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | RF | ET | SVM | ANN | LSTM | |
| 准确率/% | 91.379 3 | 93.486 6 | 94.636 0 | 98.850 6 | 98.659 0 | 99.042 1 |
| 精确率/% | 91.855 2 | 92.982 5 | 93.162 4 | 98.275 9 | 99.118 9 | 99.559 5 |
| 召回率/% | 88.260 9 | 92.173 9 | 94.782 6 | 99.130 4 | 97.826 1 | 98.260 9 |
| F1分数 | 90.022 2 | 92.576 4 | 93.965 5 | 98.701 3 | 98.468 3 | 98.905 9 |
| 杰卡德相似系数 | 81.854 8 | 86.178 9 | 88.617 9 | 97.435 9 | 96.982 8 | 97.835 5 |
| 乌修斯相似系数 | 82.489 9 | 86.777 2 | 89.149 3 | 97.673 4 | 97.282 5 | 98.060 9 |
| ROC曲线下面积 | 91.048 2 | 93.347 2 | 94.651 6 | 98.880 3 | 98.570 6 | 98.959 2 |
| 布莱尔评分 | 0.086 21 | 0.046 15 | 0.053 23 | 0.007 86 | 0.010 14 | 0.006 66 |
Tab. 3 Performance indicators of each classifier
| 指标 | 分类器 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | RF | ET | SVM | ANN | LSTM | |
| 准确率/% | 91.379 3 | 93.486 6 | 94.636 0 | 98.850 6 | 98.659 0 | 99.042 1 |
| 精确率/% | 91.855 2 | 92.982 5 | 93.162 4 | 98.275 9 | 99.118 9 | 99.559 5 |
| 召回率/% | 88.260 9 | 92.173 9 | 94.782 6 | 99.130 4 | 97.826 1 | 98.260 9 |
| F1分数 | 90.022 2 | 92.576 4 | 93.965 5 | 98.701 3 | 98.468 3 | 98.905 9 |
| 杰卡德相似系数 | 81.854 8 | 86.178 9 | 88.617 9 | 97.435 9 | 96.982 8 | 97.835 5 |
| 乌修斯相似系数 | 82.489 9 | 86.777 2 | 89.149 3 | 97.673 4 | 97.282 5 | 98.060 9 |
| ROC曲线下面积 | 91.048 2 | 93.347 2 | 94.651 6 | 98.880 3 | 98.570 6 | 98.959 2 |
| 布莱尔评分 | 0.086 21 | 0.046 15 | 0.053 23 | 0.007 86 | 0.010 14 | 0.006 66 |
| 时间 | 分类器 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | RF | ET | SVM | ANN | LSTM | |
| 训练时间 | 0.084 | 0.481 | 0.324 | 4.359 | 8.749 | 28.180 |
| 测试时间 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.099 | 0.258 |
Tab. 4 Training and testing time of each classifier
| 时间 | 分类器 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | RF | ET | SVM | ANN | LSTM | |
| 训练时间 | 0.084 | 0.481 | 0.324 | 4.359 | 8.749 | 28.180 |
| 测试时间 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.099 | 0.258 |
| 分类器 | 训练集大小 | 隐藏层 数量/个 | 神经单元 数量/个 | 迭代次数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| B | 1 397 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| C | 698 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| D | 2 086 | 3 | 64 | 500 |
| E | 2 086 | 4 | 64 | 500 |
| F | 2 086 | 2 | 32 | 500 |
| G | 2 086 | 2 | 128 | 500 |
| H | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 250 |
| I | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 750 |
Tab. 5 Parameters of different LSTM classifiers
| 分类器 | 训练集大小 | 隐藏层 数量/个 | 神经单元 数量/个 | 迭代次数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| B | 1 397 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| C | 698 | 2 | 64 | 500 |
| D | 2 086 | 3 | 64 | 500 |
| E | 2 086 | 4 | 64 | 500 |
| F | 2 086 | 2 | 32 | 500 |
| G | 2 086 | 2 | 128 | 500 |
| H | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 250 |
| I | 2 086 | 2 | 64 | 750 |
| 参数 | 数据1 | 数据2 | 数据3 | 数据4 | 数据5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kpllj | 0.65 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.88 | 0.29 |
| Kpvj | 0.70 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.62 |
| Rdj | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.08 |
| Coj /mF | 2.22 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.66 | 2.03 |
| roj /Ω | 0.026 | 0.013 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.022 |
| Loj /mH | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| Cbus /mF | 1.91 | 1.62 | 1.84 | 2.02 | 1.82 |
Tab. 6 Test data
| 参数 | 数据1 | 数据2 | 数据3 | 数据4 | 数据5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kpllj | 0.65 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.88 | 0.29 |
| Kpvj | 0.70 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.62 |
| Rdj | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.08 |
| Coj /mF | 2.22 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.66 | 2.03 |
| roj /Ω | 0.026 | 0.013 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.022 |
| Loj /mH | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| Cbus /mF | 1.91 | 1.62 | 1.84 | 2.02 | 1.82 |
| CPL | 数据1 | 数据2 | 数据3 | 数据4 | 数据5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 kW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1.4 kW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2.0 kW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Tab. 7 Stability prediction results of each classifier
| CPL | 数据1 | 数据2 | 数据3 | 数据4 | 数据5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 kW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1.4 kW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2.0 kW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | ASANO H, HATZIARGYRIOU N, IRAVANI R,et al .Microgrids:an overview of ongoing research, development, and demonstration projects[J].IEEE Power and Energy Magazine,2007,5(47):78-94. doi:10.1109/mpae.2007.376583 |
| 2 | 米阳,顾符亦可,李春煦,等 .基于自适应分段双下垂的孤岛交直流混合微电网功率协调控制[J].电力建设,2025,46(1):86-96. |
| MI Y, GU F Y K, LI C X,et al .Control strategy of islanded AC/DC hybrid microgrid power system based on adaptive segmented double-droop[J].Electric Power Construction,2025,46(1):86-96. | |
| 3 | 李金超,鹿世强,兰心怡,等 .计及需求响应动态特性的分布式智能电网运行优化方法研究[J].电网与清洁能源,2024,40(8):103-111. |
| LI J C, LU S Q, LAN X Y,et al .Research on optimization of distributed smart grid operation considering dynamic characteristics of demand response[J].Power System and Clean Energy,2024,40(8):103-111. | |
| 4 | 侯峰,冯洋,刘垚,等 .基于扰动补偿线性自抗扰的直流微电网接口变换器寻优控制[J].电网与清洁能源,2024,40(7):114-123. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2024.07.014 |
| HOU F, FENG Y, LIU Y,et al .Optimization control of the DC microgrid interface converter based on disturbance compensation and linear active disturbance rejection control[J].Power System and Clean Energy,2024,40(7):114-123. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2024.07.014 | |
| 5 | 陈旭,皇金锋,李聪林 .双极性直流微电网的改进型高阶滑模自抗扰控制[J].电力系统保护与控制,2024,52(9):111-122. |
| CHEN X, HUANG J F, LI C L .Improved high-order sliding mode active disturbance rejection control for bipolar DC microgrids[J].Power System Protection and Control,2024,52(9):111-122. | |
| 6 | 王久和,王勉,吴学智,等 .直流分布式电源系统稳定性判据研究综述[J].发电技术,2020,41(2):175-185. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19066 |
| WANG J H, WANG M, WU X Z,et al .Review of stability criteria study for direct current distributed power system[J].Power Generation Technology,2020,41(2):175-185. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19066 | |
| 7 | DRAGICEVIC T, LU X, VASQUEZ J,et al .DC microgrids-part I:a review of control strategies and stabilization techniques[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,2015:31(7):1-1. doi:10.1109/tpel.2015.2464277 |
| 8 | 周勤勇,李根兆,秦晓辉,等 .能源革命下的电力系统范式转换分析[J].中国电力,2024,57(3):1-11. doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202311115 |
| ZHOU Q Y, LI G Z, QIN X H,et al .Analysis of power system paradigm shift under energy revolution[J].Electric Power,2024,57(3):1-11. doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202311115 | |
| 9 | 王锐,赵学深,张新慧,等 .基于虚拟惯性参数可行域的直流微电网高频振荡抑制[J].中国电力,2024,57(10):123-132. |
| WANG R, ZHAO X S, ZHANG X H,et al .Virtual inertia parameter feasible region based high-frequency oscillation suppression of DC microgrid[J].Electric Power,2024,57(10):123-132. | |
| 10 | 李可然,刘继春,杨瑞琳,等 .计及下垂曲线与储能的孤岛微电网分级调度策略[J].电力科学与技术学报,2024,39(2):223-230. doi:10.19781/j.issn.1673-9140.2024.02.025 |
| LI K R, LIU J C, YANG R L,et al .Hierarchical dispatching strategy of islanded microgrid considering droop curve and energy storage[J].Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2024,39(2):223-230. doi:10.19781/j.issn.1673-9140.2024.02.025 | |
| 11 | 张琳,谢洪途,赵路路,等 .混合能源直流微电网能源优化管控策略研究[J].电力系统保护与控制,2024,52(3):141-151. |
| ZHANG L, XIE H T, ZHAO L L,et al .Energy optimization and control strategy for a hybrid energy DC microgrid[J].Power System Protection and Control,2024,52(3):141-151. | |
| 12 | 颜勤,余国翔 .光储充建一体站微电网研究综述[J].电力科学与技术学报,2024,39(1):1-12. |
| YAN Q, YU G X .Research review on microgrid of integrated photovoltaic-energy storage-charging station[J].Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2024,39(1):1-12. | |
| 13 | 卢昕,陈众励,李辉 .基于自抗扰控制的直流微电网双向Buck-Boost变换器控制策略研究[J].发电技术,2021,42(2):193-200. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20123 |
| LU X, CHEN Z L, LI H .Research on control strategy of bidirectional buck-boost converter in DC microgrid based on active disturbance rejection control[J].Power Generation Technology,2021,42(2):193-200. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20123 | |
| 14 | 郑凯元,杜文娟,王海风 .聚合恒功率负荷对直流微电网稳定性影响的阻抗法分析[J].电网技术,2021,45(1):134-148. doi:10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2020.0830 |
| ZHENG K Y, DU W J, WANG H F .DC microgrid StabilityAffected by aggregated constant power loads based on impedance method[J].Power System Technology,2021,45(1):134-148. doi:10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2020.0830 | |
| 15 | LI Z, PEI W, YE H,et al .Large signal stability analysis for DC microgrid under droop control based on mixed potential theory[J].The Journal of Engineering,2019(16):1189-1193. doi:10.1049/joe.2018.8574 |
| 16 | XIE W, HAN M, CAO W,et al .System-level large-signal stability analysis of droop-controlled DC microgrids[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,2021,36(4):4224-4236. doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.3019311 |
| 17 | 滕昌鹏,王玉斌,周博恺,等 .含恒功率负载的直流微网大信号稳定性分析[J].电工技术学报,2019,34(5):973-982. doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.L80648 |
| TENG C P, WANG Y B, ZHOU B K,et al .Large-signal stability analysis of DC microgrid with constant power loads[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2019,34(5):973-982. doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.L80648 | |
| 18 | LIU S, LI X, XIA M,et al .Takagi-sugeno multimodeling-based large signal stability analysis of DC microgrid clusters[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,2021,36(11):12670-12684. doi:10.1109/tpel.2021.3076734 |
| 19 | 刘宿城,李响,秦强栋,等 .直流微电网集群的大信号稳定性分析[J].电工技术学报,2022,37(12):3132-3147. |
| LIU S C, LI X, QIN Q D,et al .Large signal stability analysis for DC microgrid clusters[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2022,37(12):3132-3147. | |
| 20 | ALIMI O A, OUAHADA K, ABU-MAHFOUZ A M .A review of machine learning approaches to power system security and stability[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:113512-113531. doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003568 |
| 21 | AZMAN S K, ISBEIH Y J, MOURSI M S EL,et al .A unified online deep learning prediction model for small signal and transient stability[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,35(6):4585-4598. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2020.2999102 |
| 22 | HUANG T, GAO S, XIE L .A neural Lyapunov approach to transient stability assessment of power electronics-interfaced networked microgrids[J].IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,2022,13(1):106-118. doi:10.1109/tsg.2021.3117889 |
| 23 | 杨建,刘笑,董密,等 .基于深度学习的恒功率负荷直流微电网稳定性分析[J].电力系统自动化,2023,47(15):188-197. doi:10.7500/AEPS20221222001 |
| YANG J, LIU X, DONG M,et al .Deep learning based stability analysis of DC microgrid with constant power loads[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2023,47(15):188-197. doi:10.7500/AEPS20221222001 | |
| 24 | 卫广宇,应笑冬,姚延军,等 .计及荷电状态的并网型直流微电网功率协同控制策略[J/OL].发电技术,2024:1-9.. |
| WEI G Y, YING X D, YAO Y J, ai et. Power coordinated control strategy for grid-connected DC microgrid considering state-of-charge [J/OL].Power Generation Technology,2024:1-9.. | |
| 25 | 朱晓荣,孟凡奇 .含虚拟惯性控制的直流微电网稳定性分析[J].电网技术,2020,44(1):208-218. doi:10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2019.0786 |
| ZHU X R, MENG F Q .Stability analysis of DC microgrid with virtual inertia control[J].Power System Technology,2020,44(1):208-218. doi:10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2019.0786 | |
| 26 | 付红军,朱劭璇,王步华,等 .基于长短期记忆神经网络的检修态电网低频振荡风险预测方法[J].发电技术,2024,45(2):353-362. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22152 |
| FU H J, ZHU S X, WANG B H,et al .Risk prediction method of low frequency oscillation in maintenance power network based on long short term memory neural network[J].Power Generation Technology,2024,45(2):353-362. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22152 | |
| 27 | SARAJCEV P, KUNAC A, PETROVIC G,et al .Power system transient stability assessment using stacked autoencoder and voting ensemble[J].Energies,2021,14(11):3148. doi:10.3390/en14113148 |
| 28 | 封钰,宋佑斌,金晟,等 .基于随机森林算法和粗糙集理论的改进型深度学习短期负荷预测模型[J].发电技术,2023,44(6):889-895. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.23013 |
| FENG Y, SONG Y B, JIN S,et al .Improved deep learning model for forecasting short-term load based on random forest algorithm and rough set theory[J].Power Generation Technology,2023,44(6):889-895. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.23013 |
| [1] | Jun ZHANG, Tianjiao PU, Wenzhong GAO, Youbo LIU, Wei PEI, Peidong XU, Tianlu GAO, Yuyang BAI. Key Technologies and Application Prospects of Intelligent Computing in Power Systems [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 421-437. |
| [2] | Zuhan ZHANG, Dunnan LIU, Hang FAN, Liuqing YANG, Yunjie DUAN, Yun LI, Zhenyu MA. Review of Power System Prediction Technologies Based on Large Language Models [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 438-453. |
| [3] | Haoran XU, Jinyun ZHANG, Xin MA, Wenqiang LEI, Jieming CAO. Applications and Prospects of Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology Based on Large Language Models in the Nuclear Power Field [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 454-466. |
| [4] | Yixuan CHEN, Jiayang WANG, Yingjun ZHUO, Siyu LU, Baorong ZHOU. Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Accelerating Operational Simulation of Power Systems [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 467-481. |
| [5] | Bo YANG, Zijian ZHANG. Analysis of Key Technologies and Development Prospects for Renewable Energy-Powered Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production Based on Artificial Intelligence [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 482-495. |
| [6] | Langbo HOU, Hao SUN, Heng CHEN, Yue GAO. Optimization Scheduling of Integrated Energy Systems in Communities Based on Demand Response and Stackelberg Game [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 219-230. |
| [7] | Zhong LIU, Yanming HUANG, Guangming ZHU, Shuyun ZOU. Optimal Capacity Configuration Method for Multi-Microgrid System Utilizing Wind-Solar-Electric-Hydrogen Hybrid Energy Storage [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 240-251. |
| [8] | Kui WANG, Meng YU, Haijing ZHANG, Yan LI, Zhe LIU, Junhong GUO. Multi-Time Scale Optimization Strategy for New Distribution System Oriented to Photovoltaic Consumption and Low Carbon Demand Response of Ice Storage Air Conditioning Groups [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 284-295. |
| [9] | Lidong ZHANG, Zhixiang YANG, Wenfeng LI, Jiangzhe FENG, Bo ZHANG, Huaihui REN, Zhe CHEN, Zhaoxin WANG. Numerical Simulation Study on Effect of Deflectors on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 336-343. |
| [10] | Jilin LEI, Linxing YU, Yu BIE, Zhibo XU, Yuhan XIAO. Review of Energy Management Systems for Islanded Microgrids [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 370-385. |
| [11] | Yalou LI, Fei ZHAO, Xuejun FAN. Review of Grid-Forming Energy Storage and Its Applications [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(2): 386-398. |
| [12] | Shanying HU, Yong JIN, Zhenye ZHANG. Developing New Quality Productive Forces to Achieve Carbon Neutrality [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(1): 1-8. |
| [13] | Zhong LIU, Zehua ZHOU, Shuyun ZOU, Zhen LIU, Shuaicheng QIAO. Cavitation State Identification Method of Hydraulic Turbine Based on Knowledge Distillation and Convolutional Neural Network [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(1): 161-170. |
| [14] | Guoqin LAN, Ye LU, Yansheng KAN, Jiguang ZHANG, Huanhuan WANG, Fang ZHONG, Chengcai WANG, Liming XIAO, Zhaoyang WANG. Research on the Development Trends and Countermeasures of Integrated Energy Services [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(1): 19-30. |
| [15] | Lu CUI, Shilin LIU, Wan MIAO, Qing WANG. Optimized Operation Strategy of Wind-Solar-Storage Integrated Charging Station Considering Power-to-Hydrogen and Demand Response [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(1): 31-41. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||