Power Generation Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 216-225.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.23016
• Flexible Power Generation Technology Under Dual-Carbon Background • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhijun JIA1, Wei FAN2, Shaojun REN2, Tangbin WEI3
Received:
2023-08-22
Published:
2024-04-30
Online:
2024-04-29
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Zhijun JIA, Wei FAN, Shaojun REN, Tangbin WEI. Research on Combustion Stability of a 600 MW Subcritical Power Unit Under Long-Term Deep Peak Shaving[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(2): 216-225.
煤质指标 | 普准 | 高准 |
---|---|---|
Mt/% | 9.7 | 10.3 |
Mad/% | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Aad/% | 31.1 | 23.9 |
Vad/% | 25.4 | 27.4 |
St,ad/% | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Had/% | 3.8 | 3.3 |
Qnet/(kJ/g) | 17.7 | 20.3 |
R90/% | 26 | 26 |
Tab. 1 Industrial analysis of coal during the process of deep peak shaving
煤质指标 | 普准 | 高准 |
---|---|---|
Mt/% | 9.7 | 10.3 |
Mad/% | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Aad/% | 31.1 | 23.9 |
Vad/% | 25.4 | 27.4 |
St,ad/% | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Had/% | 3.8 | 3.3 |
Qnet/(kJ/g) | 17.7 | 20.3 |
R90/% | 26 | 26 |
位置 | 二次风门开度/% | |
---|---|---|
15%负荷 | 20%负荷 | |
SOFA1—7层角燃尽风风门位置 | 0 | 0 |
消旋风OFA二次风门位置 | 0 | 0 |
FF层二次风门位置 | 47 | 49 |
F层角周界风门位置 | 17 | 10 |
EF层偏转二次风门位置 | 20 | 26 |
E层周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
DE层偏转二次风门位置 | 13 | 15 |
D层周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
CD层角偏转油二次风门位置 | 25 | 15 |
C层角周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
BC层角启转二次风门位置 | 50 | 20 |
B层角周界风门位置 | 26 | 17 |
AB层偏转油二次风门位置 | 46 | 31 |
A层周界风门位置 | 28 | 20 |
AA层直吹二次风门位置 | 68 | 45 |
Tab. 2 Summary of the secondary damper opening
位置 | 二次风门开度/% | |
---|---|---|
15%负荷 | 20%负荷 | |
SOFA1—7层角燃尽风风门位置 | 0 | 0 |
消旋风OFA二次风门位置 | 0 | 0 |
FF层二次风门位置 | 47 | 49 |
F层角周界风门位置 | 17 | 10 |
EF层偏转二次风门位置 | 20 | 26 |
E层周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
DE层偏转二次风门位置 | 13 | 15 |
D层周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
CD层角偏转油二次风门位置 | 25 | 15 |
C层角周界风门位置 | 10 | 10 |
BC层角启转二次风门位置 | 50 | 20 |
B层角周界风门位置 | 26 | 17 |
AB层偏转油二次风门位置 | 46 | 31 |
A层周界风门位置 | 28 | 20 |
AA层直吹二次风门位置 | 68 | 45 |
调控指标 | 15%额定负荷 | 20%额定负荷 |
---|---|---|
负荷/MW | 88.3~92.8 | 118.1~122.2 |
A磨煤量/(t/h) | 30.1~37.5 | 37.1~43.6 |
B磨煤量/(t/h) | 24.3~31.7 | 34.9~44.5 |
A磨一次风量/(t/h) | 69.2~91.2 | 81.1~88.1 |
B磨一次风量/(t/h) | 74.1~88.3 | 90.4~98.8 |
Tab. 3 Summary of relevant variables under steady operation conditions
调控指标 | 15%额定负荷 | 20%额定负荷 |
---|---|---|
负荷/MW | 88.3~92.8 | 118.1~122.2 |
A磨煤量/(t/h) | 30.1~37.5 | 37.1~43.6 |
B磨煤量/(t/h) | 24.3~31.7 | 34.9~44.5 |
A磨一次风量/(t/h) | 69.2~91.2 | 81.1~88.1 |
B磨一次风量/(t/h) | 74.1~88.3 | 90.4~98.8 |
参数 | 阈值 |
---|---|
炉膛负压/Pa | 100 |
汽包水位/mm | 100 |
磨煤机一次风量/(t/h) | 3 |
磨煤机煤量/(t/h) | 2 |
磨煤机压差/kPa | 1 |
磨煤机加载压力/MPa | 1 |
二次风门开度/% | 3 |
炉膛出口温度/℃ | 20 |
Tab. 4 Correlation factor analysis thresholds
参数 | 阈值 |
---|---|
炉膛负压/Pa | 100 |
汽包水位/mm | 100 |
磨煤机一次风量/(t/h) | 3 |
磨煤机煤量/(t/h) | 2 |
磨煤机压差/kPa | 1 |
磨煤机加载压力/MPa | 1 |
二次风门开度/% | 3 |
炉膛出口温度/℃ | 20 |
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 120/17.1 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 22/15.7 | 0 |
Tab. 5 Flame detector fluctuation statistics of 15% rated load under stable working conditions
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 120/17.1 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 22/15.7 | 0 |
参数 | A4火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 25.63 | -32.8 | 22.14 | -12.47 |
汽包水位 | 2.54 | -6.26 | 2.08 | 2.69 |
A磨煤量 | 0.48 | -47.7 | 0.52 | -45.61 |
B磨煤量 | 0.46 | -49.9 | 0.54 | -43.85 |
A磨一次风量 | 1.79 | -83 | 1.56 | -40.29 |
B磨一次风量 | 1.13 | -139 | 2.48 | -0.9 |
AA层风门开度 | 0.82 | -14.7 | — | — |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
甲侧炉膛出口温度 | — | — | 3.39 | -13 |
乙侧炉膛出口温度 | — | — | 2.19 | -38 |
Tab. 6 Statistics of correlation parameter fluctuation under stable condition of 15% rated load
参数 | A4火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 25.63 | -32.8 | 22.14 | -12.47 |
汽包水位 | 2.54 | -6.26 | 2.08 | 2.69 |
A磨煤量 | 0.48 | -47.7 | 0.52 | -45.61 |
B磨煤量 | 0.46 | -49.9 | 0.54 | -43.85 |
A磨一次风量 | 1.79 | -83 | 1.56 | -40.29 |
B磨一次风量 | 1.13 | -139 | 2.48 | -0.9 |
AA层风门开度 | 0.82 | -14.7 | — | — |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
甲侧炉膛出口温度 | — | — | 3.39 | -13 |
乙侧炉膛出口温度 | — | — | 2.19 | -38 |
参数 | 汽包水位/mm | 炉膛负压/Pa |
---|---|---|
A4火检 | -20~20 | -60~40 |
B3火检 | -50~10 | -120~30 |
Tab. 7 15% rated load stable working condition drum water level and furnace negative pressure
参数 | 汽包水位/mm | 炉膛负压/Pa |
---|---|---|
A4火检 | -20~20 | -60~40 |
B3火检 | -50~10 | -120~30 |
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 510/17.2 | 0 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 379/12.2 | 300/9.56 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 7/3.07 | 19/22.8 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
Tab. 8 Flame detector fluctuation statistics of 20% rated load under stable working conditions
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 510/17.2 | 0 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 379/12.2 | 300/9.56 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 7/3.07 | 19/22.8 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 0 | 0 |
参数 | A2火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 35.14 | 2.06 | 40.93 | 18.9 |
汽包水位 | 25.01 | 33.1 | 12.47 | 23.6 |
A磨煤量 | 1.02 | -26.39 | 0.97 | -30.1 |
B磨煤量 | 0.74 | -28.4 | 0.69 | -33.3 |
A磨一次风量 | 2.47 | 38.2 | 0.91 | -20.1 |
B磨一次风量 | 1.03 | 14.8 | 1.09 | 0.2 |
AA层风门开度 | 1.14 | -18.1 | 1.17 | -13.4 |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
炉膛出口温度 | — | — | — | — |
Tab. 9 Statistics of correlation parameter fluctuation under stable condition of 20% rated load
参数 | A2火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 35.14 | 2.06 | 40.93 | 18.9 |
汽包水位 | 25.01 | 33.1 | 12.47 | 23.6 |
A磨煤量 | 1.02 | -26.39 | 0.97 | -30.1 |
B磨煤量 | 0.74 | -28.4 | 0.69 | -33.3 |
A磨一次风量 | 2.47 | 38.2 | 0.91 | -20.1 |
B磨一次风量 | 1.03 | 14.8 | 1.09 | 0.2 |
AA层风门开度 | 1.14 | -18.1 | 1.17 | -13.4 |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
炉膛出口温度 | — | — | — | — |
参数 | 汽包水位/mm | 炉膛负压/Pa |
---|---|---|
A1火检 | -60~70 | -180~30 |
A2火检 | -60~25 | -180~40 |
A3火检 | -10~-25 | -90~-60 |
B2火检 | -75~30 | -180~-30 |
B3火检 | 20~-20 | -30~-100 |
Tab. 10 Fluctuations of relevant variables at 20% rated load
参数 | 汽包水位/mm | 炉膛负压/Pa |
---|---|---|
A1火检 | -60~70 | -180~30 |
A2火检 | -60~25 | -180~40 |
A3火检 | -10~-25 | -90~-60 |
B2火检 | -75~30 | -180~-30 |
B3火检 | 20~-20 | -30~-100 |
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 535/18.8 | 96/22.8 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 737/17.6 | 737/25.7 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 37/15.2 | 139/17.9 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 3/10.3 | 26/19.9 |
Tab. 11 20% rated load fluctuation statistics of flame detector under fluctuating conditions
参数 | A磨煤机 | B磨煤机 |
---|---|---|
#1火检变动次数/标准差 | 535/18.8 | 96/22.8 |
#2火检变动次数/标准差 | 737/17.6 | 737/25.7 |
#3火检变动次数/标准差 | 37/15.2 | 139/17.9 |
#4火检变动次数/标准差 | 3/10.3 | 26/19.9 |
参数 | A4火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差 变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差 变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 45.1 | 23.1 | 66.1 | 97.7 |
汽包水位 | 25.01 | 33.1 | 33.7 | 63.4 |
A磨煤量 | 3.23 | 37.39 | 5.91 | 184.2 |
B磨煤量 | 3.19 | 39.4 | 5.82 | 179.2 |
A磨一次风量 | 2.04 | 46 | 1.71 | 22.7 |
B磨一次风量 | 3.09 | 123 | 3.67 | 160 |
AA层风门开度 | 3.88 | 65.7 | 3.61 | 53.5 |
总一次风量 | 5.89 | 117.2 | 5.63 | 108.2 |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | 9.86 | — |
甲侧炉膛出口为温度 | 18.7 | 341.4 | 15.9 | 275.3 |
乙侧炉膛出口为温度 | 12.23 | 233.7 | 13.6 | 272.1 |
A磨煤机加载力 | 0.74 | 220.2 | 0.49 | 96.3 |
B磨煤机加载力 | 1.31 | 446 | 1.32 | 223.5 |
Tab. 12 Statistics of associated parameter fluctuation in 20% rated load fluctuation condition
参数 | A4火检 | B3火检 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
标准差 | 标准差 变化率/% | 标准差 | 标准差 变化率/% | |
炉膛负压 | 45.1 | 23.1 | 66.1 | 97.7 |
汽包水位 | 25.01 | 33.1 | 33.7 | 63.4 |
A磨煤量 | 3.23 | 37.39 | 5.91 | 184.2 |
B磨煤量 | 3.19 | 39.4 | 5.82 | 179.2 |
A磨一次风量 | 2.04 | 46 | 1.71 | 22.7 |
B磨一次风量 | 3.09 | 123 | 3.67 | 160 |
AA层风门开度 | 3.88 | 65.7 | 3.61 | 53.5 |
总一次风量 | 5.89 | 117.2 | 5.63 | 108.2 |
BC层风门开度 | — | — | — | — |
CD层风门开度 | — | — | 9.86 | — |
甲侧炉膛出口为温度 | 18.7 | 341.4 | 15.9 | 275.3 |
乙侧炉膛出口为温度 | 12.23 | 233.7 | 13.6 | 272.1 |
A磨煤机加载力 | 0.74 | 220.2 | 0.49 | 96.3 |
B磨煤机加载力 | 1.31 | 446 | 1.32 | 223.5 |
参数 | 负荷稳定期间 | 第一次变负荷期间 | 第二次变负荷期间 |
---|---|---|---|
负荷/MW | 120 | 120~300 | 120~200 |
汽包水位/mm | -50~50 | -150~100 | -150~100 |
炉膛负压/Pa | -150~30 | -430~270 | -380~280 |
Tab. 13 Drum water level and furnace negative pressure for 20% rated load fluctuation condition
参数 | 负荷稳定期间 | 第一次变负荷期间 | 第二次变负荷期间 |
---|---|---|---|
负荷/MW | 120 | 120~300 | 120~200 |
汽包水位/mm | -50~50 | -150~100 | -150~100 |
炉膛负压/Pa | -150~30 | -430~270 | -380~280 |
1 | 习近平 .在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话[R].北京:中华人民共和国国务院,2020. |
XI J P .Speech at the general debate of the 75th session of the united nations general assembly[R].Beijing:State Council of the People’s Republic of China,2020. | |
2 | 舒印彪,张丽英,张运洲,等 .我国电力碳达峰、碳中和路径研究[J].中国工程科学,2021,23(6):1-14. doi:10.15302/j-sscae-2021.06.001 |
SHU Y B, ZHANG L Y, ZHANG Y Z,et al .Carbon peak and carbon neutrality path for China’s power industry[J].Strategic Study of CAE,2021,23(6):1-14. doi:10.15302/j-sscae-2021.06.001 | |
3 | 贠保记,张恩硕,张国,等 .考虑综合需求响应与“双碳”机制的综合能源系统优化运行[J].电力系统保护与控制,2022,50(22):11-19. |
YUN B J, ZHANG E S, ZHANG G,et al .Optimal operation of an integrated energy system considering integrated demand response and a “dual carbon”mechanism [J].Power System Protection and Control,2022,50(22):11-19. | |
4 | 舒印彪,陈国平,贺静波,等 .构建以新能源为主体的新型电力系统框架研究[J].中国工程科学,2021,23(6):61-69. doi:10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.06.003 |
SHU Y B, CHEN G Q, HE J B,et al .Building a new electric power system based on new energy sources[J].Strategic Study of CAE,2021,23(6):61-69. doi:10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.06.003 | |
5 | 陈晓光,杨秀媛,王镇林,等 .考虑多目标优化模型的风电场储能容量配置方案[J].发电技术,2022,43(5):718-730. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22020 |
CHEN X G, YANG X Y, WANG Z L,et al .Energy storage capacity allocation scheme of wind farm considering multi-objective optimization model[J].Power Generation Technology,2022,43(5):718-730. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22020 | |
6 | 陈晓光,杨秀媛,卜思齐,等 .考虑经济功能性的风电场储能系统容量配置[J].发电技术,2022,43(2):341-352. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21073 |
CHEN X G, YANG X Y, BU S Q,et al .Capacity allocation of wind farm energy storage system considering economic function[J].Power Generation Technology, 2022,43(2):341-352. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21073 | |
7 | 李志军,郭燕龙,苗庆玉 .基于解析法的高比例可再生能源系统惯量支撑储能配置[J].电测与仪表,2023,60(11):11-18. |
LI Z H, GUO Y L, MIAO Q Y,et al .High proportion of renewable energy storage system for inertial support energy storage configuration based on analytical method[J].Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation,2023,60(11):11-18. | |
8 | 梅书凡,檀勤良,代美 .考虑风光出力季节性波动的储能容量配置[J].电力工程技术,2022,41(4):51-57. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2022.04.007 |
MEI S F, TAN Q L, DAI M .Energy storage capacity configuration considering seasonal fluctuation of wind and photovoltaic output[J].Electric Power Engineering Technology,2022,41(4):51-57. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2022.04.007 | |
9 | 孙晗喆,陈洁,梁帅,等 .基于改进黏菌算法的风光电并网双层储能容量优化[J].电网与清洁能源,2023,39(5):128-136. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2023.05.016 |
SUN H Z, CHEN J, LIANG S,et al .Optimization of tow-level energy storage capacity of grid-connected wind and solar power based on improved slime mold algorithm[J]. Power System and Clean Energy,2023,39(5):128-136. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2023.05.016 | |
10 | 谭增强,王一坤,牛拥军,等 .双碳目标下煤电深度调峰及调频技术研究进展[J].热能动力工程,2022,37(8):1-8. |
TAN Z Q, WANG Y K, NIU Y J,et al .Research progress of deep peak regulation and frequency modulation technology for coal-fired power plant under double-carbon targets[J].Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2022,37(8):1-8. | |
11 | 杨寅平,曾沅,秦超,等 .面向深度调峰的火电机组灵活性改造规划模型[J].电力系统自动化,2021,45(17):79-88. doi:10.7500/AEPS20201225003 |
YANG Y P, ZENG Y, QIN C,et al .Planning model for flexibility reformation of thermal power units for deep peak regulation[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2021,45(17):79-88. doi:10.7500/AEPS20201225003 | |
12 | 魏文,姜飞,戴双凤,等 .计及需求侧储能事故备用风险与火电机组深度调峰的经济优化研究[J].电力系统保护与控制,2022,50(10):153-162. |
WEI W, JIANG F, DAI S F,et al .Economic optimization of deep peak regulation of thermal power units taking into account the risk of emergency storage on the demand side[J].Power System Protection and Control,2022,50(10):153-162. | |
13 | 张松岩,苗世洪,尹斌鑫,等 .考虑火电深度调峰的多类型储能经济性分析[J].电力建设,2022,43(1):132-142. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.01.015 |
ZHANG S Y, MIAO S H, YIN B X,et al .Economic analysis of multi-type energy storages considering the deep peak-regulation of thermal power units[J].Electric Power Construction,2022,43(1):132-142. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.01.015 | |
14 | 李雄威,王昕,顾佳伟,等 .考虑火电深度调峰的风光火储系统日前优化调度[J].中国电力,2023,56(1):1-7. |
LI X W, WANG X, GU J W,et al .Day-ahead optimal dispatching of wind-solar-thermal power storage system considering deep peak shaving of thermal power[J].Electric Power,2023,56(1):1-7. | |
15 | 胡建根,童家麟,茅建波,等 .典型燃煤锅炉深度调峰能力比较研究[J].锅炉技术,2019,50(6):59-64. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2019.06.012 |
HU J G, TONG J L, MAO J B,et al .Comparative study on deep peak shaving capability of typical coal-fired boilers[J].Boiler Technology,2019,50(6):59-64. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2019.06.012 | |
16 | 陈明,王晓翠,杨荣涛 .1 000 MW机组深度调峰期间典型问题分析和解决方法[J].锅炉技术,2021,52(4):16-18. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2021.04.010 |
CHEN M, WANG X C, YANG R T .Analysis and solution of typical problems during deep peek loadregulation of 1 000 MW thermal power unit[J].Boiler Technology,2021,52(4):16-18. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2021.04.010 | |
17 | 刘文胜,吕洪坤,童家麟,等 .600 MW亚临界锅炉深度调峰动态试验研究[J].锅炉技术,2021,52(2):19-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2021.02.004 |
LIU W S, LYU H K, TONG J L,et al .Dynamic experimental study on deep peak loading for a 600 MW subcritical boiler[J].Boiler Technology,2021,52(2):19-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2021.02.004 | |
18 | 刘文胜,吕洪坤,蔡洁聪,等 .600 MW亚临界锅炉30%额定负荷深度调峰试验研究[J].锅炉技术,2019,50(4):59-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2019.04.012 |
LIU W S, LÜ H K, CAI J C,et al .Experimental study on 30% rated depth peak-load for a 600MW sub-critical boiler[J].Boiler Technology,2019,50(4):59-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2019.04.012 | |
19 | 刘维岐,汪山入,吴炬,等 .350 MW超临界机组低负荷运行优化试验研究[J].东北电力技术,2021,42(7):5-8. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7913.2021.07.002 |
LIU W Q, WANG S R, WU J,et al .Experimental study on low load operation optimization of 350 MW supercritical unit[J].Northeast Electric Power Technology,2021,42(7):5-8. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7913.2021.07.002 | |
20 | 刘综绪,张营帅,石峰,等 .600 MW四角切圆燃烧锅炉深度调峰试验调整及优化[J].锅炉技术,2022,53(3):67-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2022.03.012 |
LIU Z X, ZHANG Y S, SHI F,et al .Adjustment and optimization of deep peak regulation test in 600 MW tangential combustion boilers[J].Boiler Technology,2022,53(3):67-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4763.2022.03.012 | |
21 | 贾志军,李飞,宿云山,等 .600 MW亚临界机组省煤器热水再循环宽负荷脱硝改造分析[J].内蒙古电力技术,2020,38(3):30-33. |
JIA Z J, LI F, SU Y S,et al .Analysis on wide-load denitrification transformation of economizer hot water recirculation for 600 MW subcritical unit[J].Inner Mongolia Electric Power,2020,38(3):30-33. |
[1] | Huasong DAI, Shaoxu PU, Guoxu CHAI, Li JIN, Weiping CHEN, Mingliang XIE. Research and Application of Deep Peak Shaving of 350 MW Supercritical Fluidized Bed Unit [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(3): 401-411. |
[2] | Zheng YANG, Yipeng SUN, Zhiqiang WEN, Liang CHENG, Zhanguo LI. Research on Dry-Wet Conversion Strategy of Supercritical Thermal Power Units Under Deep Peaking Condition [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(2): 233-239. |
[3] | Qiwei ZHENG, Huating WANG, Heng CHEN, Peiyuan PAN, Gang XU. Analysis on Thermoelectric Decoupling Technology Paths for Thermal Power Units Under the Background of Deep Peak-Shaving [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(2): 207-215. |
[4] | Sihai ZHANG, Chaoran LI, Guangliang WAN, Yinxue LIU, Hainan XU, Zhong HUANG, Hairui YANG. Deep Peak Shaving Technology for 330 MW Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(2): 199-206. |
[5] | Fangfang WANG, Pengwei YANG, Guangjin ZHAO, Qi LI, Xiaona LIU, Shuangchen MA. Development and Challenge of Flexible Operation Technology of Thermal Power Units Under New Power System [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(2): 189-198. |
[6] | Shuai CHU, Aihua WANG, Weichun GE, Yinxuan LI, Dai CUI. Analytical Method for Power Grid Dispatching Centralized Thermal Storage to Reduce Wind Abandoned Rate [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(1): 18-24. |
[7] | Weizhong FENG, Li LI. Research and Practice on Development Path of Low-carbon, Zero-carbon and Negative Carbon Transformation of Coal-fired Power Units Under “Double Carbon” Targets [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(3): 452-461. |
[8] | Yunfeng LIU, Yufeng LI, Jian WANG, Yiliang MA, Chun GUAN. Study on Water Erosion in Deep Peak Shaving of Steam Turbine [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 473-479. |
[9] | Wei LIN. The FPGA-Based Customizable Precision Real-Time Time-Frequency Correlation Analyse Algorithm for Transient-Signal Analysis [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40(1): 1-10. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||