Review on Key Parameters and Characterization Technology of CO2 Sequestration Mechanism in Saline Aquifers

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22090

Abstract

Abstract:

As an important part of carbon capture, utilization and storage(CCUS) technology, CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers is an effective means to achieve the goal of carbon neutralization. Improving the research scheme of CO₂ sequestration mechanism in saline aquifers is of great significance to accurately evaluate the storage potential. The storage mechanism of CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers was discussed, the commonly used characterization techniques were summarized, the effects of different parameters on sequestration in saline aquifers were discussed, and the future development of this technology was prospected. According to the study of different storage mechanisms, the characterization technology of sequestration in saline aquifers mainly includes reservoir rock characterization, core flooding experiment, solubility experiment, mineralization reaction experiment and so on. The storage potential of CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers is affected by many parameters, such as the residual water saturation, residual gas saturation, solubility and salt precipitation. Therefore, it is very important to select appropriate characterization techniques to determine the relevant parameters to ensure the accuracy of storage potential evaluation. In addition, the analysis of the whole process storage mechanism and the research of marine CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers project are the important research direction of this technology in the future.

Key words: carbon capture, utilization and storage(CCUS), CO₂ geological storage, sequestration in saline aquifers, storage potential, evaluation

CLC Number:

TK 09

Hang YE, Ning HAO, Qi LIU. Review on Key Parameters and Characterization Technology of CO₂ Sequestration Mechanism in Saline Aquifers[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 562-573.

Figures/Tables 3

References 76

1	中国 21 世纪议程管理中心．中国碳捕集、利用与封存技术发展路线图2019[M]．北京：科学出版社， 2019．
	The Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21．Roadmap for carbon capture， utilization and storage development in China 2019[M]．Beijing： China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.， 2019．
2	蔡博峰，李琦，张贤，等．中国二氧化碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)年度报告(2021):中国CCUS路径研究[R]．北京：生态环境部环境规划院， 2021．
	CAI B F， LI Q， ZHANG X， et al. Annual report on carbon dioxide capture， utilization and storage (CCUS) in China (2021):study on CCUS path in China[R]．Beijing： Ministry of Ecological Environment， 2021．
3	陈昌照，王万福，陈宏坤，等．二氧化碳咸水层封存的研究现状和问题[J]．油气田环境保护， 2013， 23(3)： 1-5． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3158.2013.03.001
	CHEN C Z， WANG W F， CHEN H K， et al ．The research status and issues of carbon dioxide sequestration in saline aquifer[J]．Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields， 2013， 23(3)： 1-5． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3158.2013.03.001
4	JAYASEKARA D W， RANJITH P G， WANNIARACHCHI W A M， et al ．Understanding the chemico-mineralogical changes of caprock sealing in deep saline CO₂ sequestration environments： a review study[J]．The Journal of Supercritical Fluids， 2020， 161． doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104819
5	DE SILVA G， RANJITH P G， PERERA M ．Geochemical aspects of CO₂ sequestration in deep saline aquifers： a review[J]．Fuel， 2015， 155： 128-143． doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.045
6	BRAD P ．The global status of CCS 2021[M]．Australia： The Global CCS Institute， 2021．
7	叶航，刘琦，彭勃．基于二氧化碳驱油技术的碳封存潜力评估研究进展[J]．洁净煤技术， 2021， 27(2)： 107-116．
	YE H， LIU Q， PENG B ．Evaluation of carbon storage potential based on CO₂ flooding technology： a review[J]．Clean Coal Technology， 2021， 27(2)： 107-116．
8	BACHU S， BONIJOLY D， BRADSHAW J， et al ．CO₂ storage capacity estimation： methodology and gaps[J]．International journal of greenhouse gas control， 2007， 1(4)： 430-443． doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00086-2
9	GOODMAN A， HAKALA A， BROMHAL G， et al ．US DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2011， 5(4)： 952-965． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010
10	HÖLLER S， VIEBAHN P ．Facing the uncertainty of CO₂ storage capacity in China by developing different storage scenarios[J]．Energy Policy， 2016， 89： 64-73． doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.043
11	BACHU S ．Review of CO₂ storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2015， 40： 188-202． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007
12	AMINU M D， NABAVI S A， ROCHELLE C A， et al ．A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage[J]．Applied Energy， 2017， 208： 1389-1419． doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.015
13	WEI N， LI X， JIAO Z， et al ．A hierarchical framework for CO₂ storage capacity in deep saline aquifer formations[J]．Frontiers in Earth Science， 2022， 9：1-21． doi:10.3389/feart.2021.777323
14	VISHAL V， SINGH T ．Geologic carbon sequestration [J]．Environ Geosci， 2016， 16：47-133． doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27019-7
15	李阳．碳中和与碳捕集利用封存技术进展[M]．北京：中国石化出版社， 2021．
	LI Y ．Progress in carbon neutralization and carbon capture， utilization and storage technology[M]．Beijing： China Petrochemical Press Ltd.， 2021．
16	METZ B， DAVIDSON O， DE CONINCK H， et al ．IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage[M]．Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 2005．
17	KUMAR S， FOROOZESH J， EDLMANN K， et al ．A comprehensive review of value-added CO₂ sequestration in subsurface saline aquifers[J]．Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering， 2020， 81： 103437． doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103437
18	IGLAUER S ．Optimum storage depths for structural CO₂ trapping[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2018， 77： 82-87． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.009
19	李铱，李旭峰，沈照理，等．CO₂地质封存室内实验中盐水种类对残余水形成的影响[J]．地学前缘， 2015， 22(4)： 312-319．
	LI Y， LI X F， SHEN Z L， et al ．The effects of brine species on the formation of residual water in laboratory experiments of CO₂ geological storage[J]．Earth Science Frontiers， 2015， 22(4)： 312-319．
20	NGHIEM L， YANG C， SHRIVASTAVA V， et al ．Risk mitigation through the optimization of residual gas and solubility trapping for CO₂ storage in saline aquifers[J]．Energy Procedia， 2009， 1(1)： 3015-3022． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.079
21	李海燕，彭仕宓，许明阳，等．CO₂在深部咸水层中的埋存机制研究进展[J]．科技导报， 2013， 31(2)： 72-79．
	LI H Y， PENG S M， XU M Y， et al ．CO₂ storage mechanism in deep saline aquifers[J]．Science & Technology Review， 2013， 31(2)： 72-79．
22	武爱兵，李铱，常春，等．不同成分盐水驱CO₂的残余气饱和度[J]．现代地质， 2014， 28(5)： 1061-1067． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2014.05.023
	WU A B， LI Y， CHANG C， et al ．The residual gas saturation of different components of saline flooding CO₂ [J]．Geoscience， 2013， 31(2)： 72-79． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2014.05.023
23	BACHU S ．CO₂ storage in geological media： role， means， status and barriers to deployment[J]．Progress in energy and combustion science， 2008， 34(2)： 254-273． doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001
24	KUMAR A, NOH M, SEPEHRNOORI K, et al ．Carbon dioxide dapture for storage in deep geologic formations-results from the CO₂ capture project[M]．Amsterdam： Elsevier Science， 2005． doi:10.1016/b978-008044570-0/50140-9
25	DE SILVA P N K， RANJITH P ．A study of methodologies for CO₂ storage capacity estimation of saline aquifers[J]．Fuel， 2012， 93： 13-27． doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.004
26	SUEKANE T， NOBUSO T， HIRAI S， et al ．Geological storage of carbon dioxide by residual gas and solubility trapping[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2008， 2(1)： 58-64． doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00096-5
27	BENSON S M， COLE D R ．CO₂ sequestration in deep sedimentary formations[J]．Elements， 2008， 4(5)： 325-331． doi:10.2113/gselements.4.5.325
28	MENG Q， JIANG X ．Numerical analyses of the solubility trapping of CO₂ storage in geological formations[J]．Applied energy， 2014， 130： 581-591． doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.037
29	GARCIA S， LIU Q， BACON D H， et al ．An investigation of reaction parameters on geochemical storage of non-pure CO₂ streams in iron oxide-bearing formations[J]．Fuel processing technology， 2014， 128： 402-411． doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.027
30	LIU Q， MAROTO-VALER M M. Studies of pH buffer systems to promote carbonate formation for CO₂ sequestration in brines[J]．Fuel Processing Technology， 2012， 98： 6-13． doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.023
31	LIU Q， MAROTO-VALER M M ．Investigation of the pH effect of a typical host rock and buffer solution on CO₂ sequestration in synthetic brines[J]．Fuel Processing Technology， 2010， 91(10)： 1321-1329． doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.002
32	WANG D， DONG B， BREEN S， et al ．Approaches to research on CO₂/brine two-phase migration in saline aquifers[J]．Hydrogeology Journal， 2015， 23(1)： 1-18． doi:10.1007/s10040-014-1186-1
33	MURUGESU M P， PRASAD M， PYLYPENKO S ．Surface and bulk characterization of reservoir and cap-rocks： Past， present， and future[J]．Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A： Vacuum， Surfaces， and Films， 2020， 38(5)： 050801． doi:10.1116/6.0000319
34	甘满光，缪秀秀，张力为，等．CT扫描技术在二氧化碳地质利用与封存领域的应用研究综述[J]．水利水电技术， 2019， 50(8)： 174-184． doi:10.1130/abs/2019am-333827
	GAN M G， MIAO X X， ZHANG L W， et al ．Review on applications of CT scanning technique in the field of CO₂ geological utilization and storage[J]．Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering，2019，50(8)： 174-184． doi:10.1130/abs/2019am-333827
35	SUN Y， LI Q， YANG D， et al ．Laboratory core flooding experimental systems for CO₂ geosequestration： an updated review over the past decade[J]．Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2016，8(1)： 113-126． doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.12.001
36	SPYCHER N， PRUESS K ．CO₂-H₂O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO₂．Ⅱ‍．partitioning in chloride brines at 12-100 ℃ and up to 600 bar[J]．Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 2005， 69(13)： 3309-3320． doi:10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015
37	DE SILVA P N K， RANJITH P ．Advanced core flooding apparatus to estimate permeability and storage dynamics of CO₂ in large coal specimens[J]．Fuel， 2013， 104： 417-425． doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.012
38	EDLMANN K， HASZELDINE S， MCDERMOTT C ．Experimental investigation into the sealing capability of naturally fractured shale caprocks to supercritical carbon dioxide flow[J]．Environmental earth sciences， 2013， 70(7)： 3393-3409． doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2407-y
39	AKBARABADI M， PIRI M ．Co-sequestration of SO₂with supercritical CO₂ in carbonates： an experimental study of capillary trapping， relative permeability， and capillary pressure[J]．Advances in Water Resources， 2015， 77： 44-56． doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.011
40	MENKE H P， BIJELJIC B， ANDREW M G， et al ．Dynamic three-dimensional pore-scale imaging of reaction in a carbonate at reservoir conditions[J]．Environmental Science & Technology， 2015， 49(7)： 4407-4414． doi:10.1021/es505789f
41	MA J， PETRILLI D， MANCEAU J C， et al ．Core scale modelling of CO₂ flowing： identifying key parameters and experiment fitting[J]．Energy Procedia， 2013， 37： 5464-5472． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.466
42	ZHANG Y， KOGURE T， CHIYONOBU S， et al ．Influence of heterogeneity on relative permeability for CO₂/brine： CT observations and numerical modeling[J]．Energy Procedia， 2013， 37： 4647-4654． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.241
43	IGLAUER S ．Dissolution trapping of carbon dioxide in reservoir formation brine-a carbon storage mechanism[M]．INTECH Open Access Publisher， 2011． doi:10.2174/978160805228811201010135
44	王军良，李桂璇，周义明，等．二氧化碳在油气田地质封存中溶解物性的研究进展[J]．油田化学， 2018， 35(3)： 550-561．
	WANG J L， LI G X， ZHOU Y M， et al ．Review on dissolved physical properties of carbon dioxide in geological storage of oil and gas fields[J]．Oilfield Chemistry， 2018， 35(3)： 550-561．
45	REZK M G， FOROOZESH J， ABDULRAHMAN A， et al ．CO₂ Diffusion and Dispersion in Porous Media： Review of Advances in Experimental Measurements and Mathematical Models[J]．Energy & Fuels， 2021，36(1)： 133-155． doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03552
46	RIMMELE G， BARLET-GOUEDARD V， RENARD F ．Evolution of the petrophysical and mineralogical properties of two reservoir rocks under thermodynamic conditions relevant for CO₂ geological storage at 3 km depth[J]．Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole， 2010， 65(4)： 565-580． doi:10.2516/ogst/2009071
47	索瑞厅，李旭峰，高鹏宇，等．温度压力对岩心尺度CO₂-水-岩系统中残余水影响的实验研究[J]．中国电机工程学报， 2021， 41(11)： 3711-3722．
	SUO R T， LI X F， GAO P Y， et al.．Experimental study on the effects of temperature and pressure on residual water in the CO₂-H₂O-rock system of core-scale[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE， 2021， 41(11)： 3711-3722．
48	LI Y， RANJITH P， PERERA M， et al ．Residual water formation during the CO₂ storage process in deep saline aquifers and factors influencing it： a review[J]．Journal of CO₂ Utilization， 2017， 20： 253-262． doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.05.022
49	IGLAUER S， MATHEW M， BRESME F ．Molecular dynamics computations of brine-CO₂ interfacial tensions and brine-CO₂-quartz contact angles and their effects on structural and residual trapping mechanisms in carbon geo-sequestration[J]．Journal of Colloid and Interface Science， 2012， 386(1)： 405-414． doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.052
50	SARAJI S， PIRI M， GOUAL L ．The effects of SO₂ contamination， brine salinity， pressure， and temperature on dynamic contact angles and interfacial tension of supercritical CO₂/brine/quartz systems[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2014， 28： 147-155． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.024
51	LI Y， WU A， ZHANG C， et al ．The effects of quartz content on the formation of residual water in a brine-CO₂-quartz system： an experimental study[J]．Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering， 2015， 27： 1609-1619． doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.10.027
52	REYNOLDS C， BLUNT M， KREVOR S ．Impact of reservoir conditions on CO₂-brine relative permeability in sandstones[J]．Energy Procedia， 2014， 63： 5577-5585． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.591
53	BACHU S ．Drainage and imbibition CO₂/brine relative permeability curves at in situ conditions for sandstone formations in western Canada[J]．Energy Procedia， 2013， 37： 4428-4436． doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.001
54	SZULCZEWSKI M， MACMINN C， JUANES R ．Theoretical analysis of how pressure buildup and CO₂ migration can both constrain storage capacity in deep saline aquifers[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2014， 23： 113-118． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.006
55	罗强，孙雷，李士伦，等．水驱气藏残余气饱和度研究综述[J]．内蒙古石油化工， 2016， 42(10)： 134-139． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2016.10.049
	LUO Q， SUN L， LI S L， et al ．Review on residual gas saturation in water-flooding gas reservoir[J]．Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry， 2016， 42(10)： 134-139． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2016.10.049
56	ZAPATA Y， KRISTENSEN M R， HUERTA N， et al ．CO₂ geological storage： critical insights on plume dynamics and storage efficiency during long-term injection and post-injection periods[J]．Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2020，83：103542． doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103542
57	ALI M， ARIF M， SAHITO M F， et al ．CO₂-wettability of sandstones exposed to traces of organic acids： implications for CO₂ geo-storage[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2019， 83： 61-8． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.002
58	ZHAO C， SONG Y， CHEN M， et al ．Micro/nanoscale heat and mass transfer［C］// ASME 2019 6th International Conference， 2019． doi:10.1115/mnhmt2019-4256
59	RASMUSSON K， RASMUSSON M， TATOMIR A， et al ．Exploring residual CO₂ trapping in Heletz sandstone using pore-network modeling and a realistic pore-space topology obtained from a micro-CT scan[J]．Greenhouse Gases： Science and Technology， 2021， 11(5)： 907-923． doi:10.1002/ghg.2100
60	RASMUSSON K， RASMUSSON M， TSANG Y， et al ．Residual trapping of carbon dioxide during geological storage：insight gained through a pore-network modeling approach[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2018， 74： 62-78． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.04.021
61	XU L， LI Q， MYERS M， et al ．Migration of carbon dioxide in sandstone under various pressure/temperature conditions： from experiment to simulation[J]．Greenhouse Gases： Science and Technology，2022， 12(2)： 233-248． doi:10.1002/ghg.2140
62	KAMAL M S， ADEBAYO A R， FOGANG L T， et al ．Improving gas sequestration by surfactant-alternating- gas injection： a comparative evaluation of the surfactant type and concentration[J]．Journal of Surfactants and Detergents， 2018， 21(5)： 667-675． doi:10.1002/jsde.12162
63	BAKHSHIAN S ．Dynamics of dissolution trapping in geological carbon storage[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2021， 112： 103520． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103520
64	WAN Y， DU S， LIN G， et al ．Dissolution sequestration mechanism of CO₂ at the Shiqianfeng saline aquifer in the Ordos Basin， northwestern China[J]．Arabian Journal of Geosciences， 2017， 10(3)： 1-13． doi:10.1007/s12517-017-2858-7
65	RAAD S M J， HASSANZADEH H ．Does impure CO₂impede or accelerate the onset of convective mixing in geological storage？‍[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2016， 54： 250-257． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.011
66	RAAD S M J， HASSANZADEH H ．Prospect for storage of impure carbon dioxide streams in deep saline aquifers：a convective dissolution perspective[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2017， 63： 350-355． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.06.011
67	HAN W S， KIM K Y， ESSER R P， et al ．Sensitivity study of simulation parameters controlling CO₂ trapping mechanisms in saline formations[J]．Transport in Porous Media， 2011， 90(3)： 807-829． doi:10.1007/s11242-011-9817-7
68	胡丽莎，常春，于青春．鄂尔多斯盆地山西组地下咸水CO₂溶解能力[J]．地球科学(中国地质大学学报)， 2012， 37(2)： 301-306．
	HU L S， CHANG C， YU Q C ．CO₂ solubility in Shanxi formation water of ordos basin[J]．Earth Science， 2012， 37(2)： 301-306．
69	王璐，于青春．地下咸水中Ca²⁺和Mg²⁺对CO₂溶解度的影响[J]．水文地质工程地质， 2015， 42(5)： 22-28．
	WANG L， YU Q C ．The effect of Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ on the solubility of CO₂ in the formation brines[J]．Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology， 2015， 42(5)： 22-28．
70	REZK M G， FOROOZESH J ．Study of convective- diffusive flow during CO₂ sequestration in fractured heterogeneous saline aquifers[J]．Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering， 2019， 69： 102926． doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102926
71	MIRI R， HELLEVANG H ．Salt precipitation during CO₂ storage：a review[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2016， 51： 136-147． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.015
72	GRUDE S， DVORKIN J， CLARK A ．Pressure effects caused by CO₂ injection in the snøhvit field[J]．First Break， 2013，31(12)：99． doi:10.3997/1365-2397.31.12.72203
73	ANDRE L, PEYSSON Y, AZAROUAL M ．Well injectivity during CO₂ storage operations in deep saline aquifers-Part 2: Numerical simulations of drying, salt deposit mechanisms and role of capillary forces[J]．International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control， 2014， 22： 301-312． doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.030
74	EDEM D E， ABBA M K， NOURIAN A， et al ．Experimental study on the interplay between different brine types/concentrations and CO₂ injectivity for effective CO₂ storage in deep saline aquifers[J]．Sustainability， 2022， 14(2)： 986． doi:10.3390/su14020986
75	YUSOF M A M， NEUYAM Y A S， IBRAHIM M A， et al ．Experimental study of CO₂ injectivity impairment in sandstone due to salt precipitation and fines migration[J]．Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology， 2022： 1-12． doi:10.1007/s13202-022-01453-w
76	高志豪，赵锐锐，成建梅．砂岩含水层CO₂封存中考虑盐沉淀反馈作用的数值模拟：以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J]．地质科技通报， 2022， 41(1)： 269-277．
	GAO Z H， ZHAO R R， CHENG J M ．Numerical simulation of CO₂ sequestration in sandstone aquifers with feedback effect of salt precipitation： a case study of ordos basin[J]．Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology， 2022， 41(1)： 269-277．

项目名称	状态	国家	投运时间	行业	最大捕集能力/(Mt/a)	捕集类型	封存类型
Sleipner	运行中	挪威	1996	天然气处理	0.40	工业分离	专用地质封存
Snøhvit	运行中	挪威	2008	天然气处理	0.70	工业分离	专用地质封存
Quest	运行中	加拿大	2015	制氢、油砂升级	1.20	工业分离	专用地质封存
Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage	运行中	美国	2017	乙醇生产	1.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
Gorgon Carbon Dioxide	运行中	澳大利亚	2019	天然气处理	4.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
Qatar LNG CCS	运行中	卡塔尔	2019	天然气处理	1.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
神华CCS	暂时停注	中国	2010	煤制油	0.15	工业分离	专用地质封存

项目名称	状态	国家	投运时间	行业	最大捕集能力/(Mt/a)	捕集类型	封存类型
Sleipner	运行中	挪威	1996	天然气处理	0.40	工业分离	专用地质封存
Snøhvit	运行中	挪威	2008	天然气处理	0.70	工业分离	专用地质封存
Quest	运行中	加拿大	2015	制氢、油砂升级	1.20	工业分离	专用地质封存
Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage	运行中	美国	2017	乙醇生产	1.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
Gorgon Carbon Dioxide	运行中	澳大利亚	2019	天然气处理	4.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
Qatar LNG CCS	运行中	卡塔尔	2019	天然气处理	1.00	工业分离	专用地质封存
神华CCS	暂时停注	中国	2010	煤制油	0.15	工业分离	专用地质封存

封存机理	表征方法
构造封存	CO₂-地层水岩心驱替实验
残余气封存	CO₂-地层水岩心驱替实验
溶解封存	CO₂-地层水溶解性实验
矿化封存	CO₂-地层水-岩石矿化反应实验

封存机理	表征方法
构造封存	CO₂-地层水岩心驱替实验
残余气封存	CO₂-地层水岩心驱替实验
溶解封存	CO₂-地层水溶解性实验
矿化封存	CO₂-地层水-岩石矿化反应实验

[1]	Yucheng LIU, Yuan YANG, Yuhao HU, Yuhang LI, Zitai ZHAO, Zhiyong MA, Yuliang DONG. Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Production Station Equipment Based on Event Tree Cascading Fault Deduction and Evidential Reasoning [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 42-50.
[2]	Zhihua CHEN, Mengkai YOU, Wei CAI, Jingwei HU, Xing HU, Aifang ZHANG, Kejie ZHANG, Wei WANG. Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Energy Storage Power Station With Full Life Cycle [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 883-888.
[3]	Ning WANG, Zhiqiang CHEN, Mingyi LIU, Peng ZHANG, Xi CAO, Zeyu LU, Haodong LEI, Chuanzhao CAO, Xiao YAN, Guopeng ZHOU. Health Status Assessment of Lithium-ion Battery Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(5): 784-791.
[4]	Xiaotong GAO, Zhilong QIN, Xinyu GAO. Reliability Evaluation of Multi-Energy Generation and Transmission System With Offshore Wind Power-Photovoltaic-Energy Storage [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 626-635.
[5]	Yiming HAN, Pengfei XU, Jianfeng GONG, Yaru SHEN. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation System of Power Grid Development and Operation Based on User Demand [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 636-644.
[6]	Yakun HUANG, Jinyi LIU, Xiaosong ZHANG. Configuration Optimization of Off-Grid Energy System Based on HT-PEMFC and VRFB [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 305-312.
[7]	Xiaoguang CHEN, Xiuyuan YANG, Siqi BU, Zhiqiang XU. Capacity Allocation of Wind Farm Energy Storage System Considering Economic Function [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 341-352.
[8]	Qianwei FENG, Renhan ZHU, Sida XU, Bo LIU, Yang ZHANG, Fengji WANG, Yue ZHU. Performance Evaluation and Analysis of Key Parameters of SCR Ultra-low Emission for 1 000 MW Coal-fired Unit [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1): 168-174.
[9]	Hao SHI, Haiping XIAO, Yanpeng LIU. Prediction and Comparison of Ash Fusion Temperatures Based on BP Neural Network and Least Squares Support Vector Machine [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1): 139-146.
[10]	Xuedong WANG, Mingchao JIANG, Ang SONG. Performance Evaluation Test of Low-Pressure Economizer and Corrected Calculation Method of Energy Saving Effect [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(2): 280-287.
[11]	Rangda DUAN. A Post-evaluation Index System of Active Distribution Network Project and Its Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 86-93.
[12]	Xin GAO, Fei TANG, Tongyan ZHANG, Yu LI. Optimal Decision-making Method of Wind-proof and Disaster-resistant Reinforcement Measures for Distribution Network [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 78-85.
[13]	Zhipeng SHEN, Hui XIONG, Jiebei ZHU, Chong SHAO, Honglei XU, Wei QIU. Modelling and Analysis on Evaluation Factor Sets Affecting the Safe and High-efficiency Operation of UHVDC Transmission Project [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 48-59.
[14]	Lei ZHOU, Ju ZHANG, Ziyuan SONG, Zhiping YANG, Peihu GUO, Haiping XIAO, Chen ZHANG, Jianlong LI. Application and Energy-saving Analysis of Built-in Array Acoustic Sootblower [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(6): 706-714.
[15]	Dunnan LIU,Tingting ZHANG,Hua LI,Caijuan QI,Yanxia MA,Weiqi ZHANG,Xiaofeng XU. Integrated Energy System Planning Model for Ubiquitous Power Internet of Things [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(1): 50-55.

Review on Key Parameters and Characterization Technology of CO₂ Sequestration Mechanism in Saline Aquifers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 76

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments