Definition and Influencing Factors of Short-Circuit Ratio Between Offshore Wind Power Cluster and Thermal Power Bundling System

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22043

Abstract

Abstract:

The short-circuit ratio is an important indicator to measure the risk of subsynchronous oscillation induced by the access of the wind farm to alternating current system. The current short-circuit ratio does not have a clear definition and a detailed calculation formula for the short-circuit ratio of wind-fire bundled and grid-connected operation has not been given. Therefore, for an actual planning scenario of dual offshore wind power clusters and thermal power bundling system, a short-circuit ratio calculation method was proposed to reveal the influence of the interaction of dual wind power clusters on subsynchronous oscillation. The research results show that the wind-fire bundling and grid connection can improve the short-circuit ratio of the system. Compared with pure wind power, the speed of reducing the short-circuit ratio is slowed down and the stability of subsynchronous oscillation is improved. From the analysis of the formula, the three influencing factors of the short-circuit ratio of wind-fire bundling are system impedance, fan ratio, and wind-fire ratio. The analysis results show that the fan ratio has the least impact on the subsynchronous oscillation, and the wind-fire ratio has the greatest impact. Finally, a model of an actual planning offshore wind power cluster and thermal power bundling system was built in PSCAD/EMTDC to verify the rationality of the above research results.

Key words: offshore wind power, wind and fire bundling, short-circuit ratio, system decoupling, subsynchronous oscillation

CLC Number:

TK 81

Zuozhou CHEN, Hao YU, Panpan WANG, Honglin CHEN, Wuhui CHEN. Definition and Influencing Factors of Short-Circuit Ratio Between Offshore Wind Power Cluster and Thermal Power Bundling System[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 207-217.

Figures/Tables 25

Fig. 1 Alternating current grid-connected system for a single wind farm

Fig. 2 AC grid-connected system for dual wind farms

Fig. 3 Dual wind field decoupling system

Fig. 4 Schematic diagram of AC grid-connected system for thermal power access to dual wind farms

Fig. 5 Topological diagram of wind and fire bundling AC system in double wind farms

Fig. 6 Relationship between thermal power access and short-circuit ratio

Tab. 1 Short-circuit ratio of dual wind farm system corresponding to different wind farm capacity ratios when the total number of wind turbines is 2.0 pu

n₁∶n₂	n₁/pu	n₂/pu	短路比
1∶1	1.000	1.000	0.363 6
5∶6	0.909	1.091	0.356 3
4∶5	0.889	1.111	0.353 2
3∶4	0.857	1.143	0.347 5
2∶3	0.800	1.200	0.336 1
1∶2	0.667	1.333	0.308 5

Fig. 7 Relationship between short-circuit ratio KSCRA and the number of wind turbines in the double wind farm system

Fig. 8 Relationship between total wind power capacity of wind-fire bundling system and short-circuit ratio of wind farm

Tab. 2 Short-circuit ratio of dual-wind farm system corresponding to different wind farm capacity ratios when the total number of wind turbines is 0.6 pu

n₁∶n₂	n₁/pu	n₂/pu	短路比
1∶1	0.30	0.30	1.212
2∶3	0.24	0.36	1.120
1∶2	0.20	0.40	1.028

Tab.3 Short-circuit ratio of double wind farm system corresponding to CASE-B

T_B	n_B1/台	n_B2/台	短路比
1∶1	300	300	2.4
2∶3	240	360	2.1
1∶2	200	400	2.0

Tab.4 Short-circuit ratio of double wind farm system corresponding to CASE-C

n_C/台	n_C1/台	n_C2/台	短路比
500	250	250	2.9
800	400	400	1.8
1 000	500	500	1.4

Fig. 9 Schematic diagram of short-circuit ratio change of CASE-A

Fig. 10 Simulation waveform of electromagnetic torque of CASE-A thermal power unit

Fig. 11 Spectrum analysis of electromagnetic torque of thermal power unit within 6-10 s

Fig. 12 CASE-A wind power active power simulation waveform diagram

Fig. 13 Wind power active power spectrum analysis within 6-10 s

Fig. 14 Active power curve of CASE-B wind power transmission

Fig. 15 Electromagnetic torque curve of CASE-B thermal power unit

Fig. 16 Wind power active power spectrum analysis when the ratio of double wind farms is 2∶3

Fig. 17 Analysis of electromagnetic torque spectrum of CASE-B thermal power unit

Fig. 18 CASE-C wind farm output power curve

Fig. 19 CASE-C thermal power unit electromagnetic torque oscillation curve

Fig. 20 Spectrum analysis of thermal power electromagnetic torque when 1 000 wind turbines are put into operation

Fig. 21 Wind power active power spectrum analysis when 1 000 wind turbines are put into operation

References 26

1	刘新苗，卢洵，娄源媛，等．基于时序运行模拟的风火打捆最优容量配比整定[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2021，49(21)：53-62．
	LIU X M， LU X， LOU Y Y，et al ．Optimal setting of wind-thermal-bundled capacity ratio based on chronological operation simulation[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2021，49(21)：53-62．
2	沙志成，王艳，郑帅．风火打捆比例对直流孤岛系统稳定性影响的研究[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2017，45(14)：148-154． doi:10.7667/PSPC161098
	SHA Z Z， WANG Y， ZHENG S ．Study on the effect of wind-thermal installed capacity ratio on the stability of DC islanded system[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2017，45(14)：148-154． doi:10.7667/PSPC161098
3	姜欣，陈红坤，回俊龙，等．计及弃风的风电场最优装机容量[J]．电工技术学报，2016，31(18)：160-168． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6753.2016.18.020
	JIANG X， CHEN H K， HUI J L，et al ．Optimal installed capacity of wind farm considering wind power curtailment[J]．Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society，2016，31(18)：160-168． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6753.2016.18.020
4	于志勇，宋新甫，张增强，等．风电功率外送输电容量规划的经济性研究[J]．四川电力技术，2020，43(4)：56-60．
	YU Z Y， SONG X F， ZHANG Z Q，et al ．Economic research on transmission capacity planning of wind power delivery[J]．Sichuan Electric Power Technology，2020，43(4)：56-60．
5	朱建华，李振清，许立长．基于随机子空间方法的光伏变流器模态识别和分析[J]．发电技术，2021，42(2)：201-206． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19141
	ZHU J H， LI Z Q， XU L C.Modal identification and analysis of photovoltaic converter based on random subspace[J]．Power Generation Technology，2021，42(2)：201-206． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19141
6	王利超，于永军，张明远，等.直驱风电机组阻抗建模及次同步振荡影响因素分析[J]．电力工程技术，2020，39(1)：170-177． doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2020.01.024
	WANG L C， YU Y J， ZHANG M Y，et al ．Impedance model and analysis of subsynchronous oscillation influence factors for grid-connected full-converter wind turbines[J].Electric Power Engineering Technology，2020，39(1)：170-177． doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2020.01.024
7	赵伟哲，崔成，严干贵，等．用于次同步振荡分析的直驱风电场等值模型[J]．智慧电力，2022，50(2)：22-28． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2022.02.004
	ZHAO W Z， CUI C， YAN G G，et al ．Equivalent model of D-PMSG-based wind farm for subsynchronous oscillation analysis[J]．Smart Power，2022，50(2)：22-28． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2022.02.004
8	黄星宇，罗萍萍，龚锦霞，等．新能源并网系统次同步谐波相量检测方法[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2020，48(13)：38-44．
	HUANG X Y， LUO P P， GONG J X，et al ．Subsynchronous harmonic phasor detection in a renewable energy grid-connected system[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2020，48(13)：38-44．
9	朱子琪，张文松，李洛，等．考虑弃风限电风险的风火打捆外送多目标优化调度方法[J]．可再生能源，2019，37(7)：1034-1041． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5292.2019.07.015
	ZHU Z Q， ZHANG W S， LI L，et al ．Multi-objective optimization scheduling method for wind-thermal-bundled transmitted system considering wind curtailment and power shortage risk[J]．Renewable Energy Resources，2019，37(7)：1034-1041． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5292.2019.07.015
10	汤奕，赵丽莉，郭小江．风电比例对风火打捆外送系统功角暂态稳定性影响[J]．电力系统自动化，2013，37(20)：34-40． doi:10.7500/AEPS201209111
	TANG Y， ZHAO L L， GUO X J ．Impact of wind power penetration on angle transient stability of wind-thermal combined system[J]．Automation of Electric Power Systems，2013，37(20)：34-40． doi:10.7500/AEPS201209111
11	田军，张师，周毅博，等．风火打捆交直流混联系统暂态稳定控制策略研究[J]．智能电网，2016，4(10)：1003-1006．
	TIAN J， ZHANG S， ZHOU Y B，et al ．Control strategy for transient stability of wind-thermal-bundled AC-DC hybrid power system[J]．Smart Grid，2016，4(10)：1003-1006．
12	赵祥，张师，周毅博，等．风火打捆交直流混联送端系统暂态稳定性分析[J]．智能电网，2015，3(7)：594-602．
	ZHAO X， ZHANG S， ZHOU Y B，et al ．Analysis on transient stability for wind-thermal-bundled power transmitted by AC/DC system[J]．Smart Grid，2015，3(7)：594-602．
13	王嘉铭，余浩，陈武晖．多馈入直流输电系统换相失败研究综述[J]．发电技术，2020，41(4)：335-345． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19026
	WANG J M， YU H， CHEN W H ．Research on commutation failure in multi-feed HVDC transmission system[J]．Power Generation Technology，2020，41(4)：335-345． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19026
14	吴萍，陈昊，赵兵，等．风光火打捆交直流混联外送系统交互影响及稳定性研究[J]．电网技术，2016，40(7)：1934-1942．
	WU P， CHEN H， ZHAO B，et al ．Study on interaction and stability characteristics of bundled wind-PV-thermal power transmitted with AC/DC system[J]．Power System Technology，2016，40(7)：1934-1942．
15	李生福，张爱玲，李少华，等．“风火打捆”交直流外送系统的暂态稳定控制研究[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2015，43(1)：108-114． doi:10.7667/j.issn.1674-3415.2015.01.019
	LI S F， ZHANG A L， LI S H，et al ．Study on transient stability control for wind-thermal-bundled power transmitted by AC/DC system[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2015，43(1)：108-114． doi:10.7667/j.issn.1674-3415.2015.01.019
16	郭小江，赵丽莉，汤奕，等．风火打捆交直流外送系统功角暂态稳定研究[J]．中国电机工程学报，2013，33(22)：19-25．
	GUO X J， ZHAO L L， TANG Y，et al ．Study on angle transient stability for wind-thermal-bundled power transmitted by AC/DC system[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2013，33(22)：19-25．
17	The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers， Inc. ． IEEE guide for planning DC links terminating at AC locations having low short-circuit capacities：IEEE standard 1204—1997 [S]．New York：The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers，Inc.，1997．
18	SHAO Y， TANG Y ．Fast evaluation of commutation failure risk in multi-infeed HVDC systems[J]．IEEE Transactions on Power Systems，2018，33(1)：646-653． doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2700045
19	林伟芳，汤涌，卜广全．多馈入交直流系统短路比的定义和应用[J]．中国电机工程学报，2008，28(31)：1-8． doi:10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2008.31.001
	LIN W F， TANG Y， BU G Q ．Definition and application of short circuit ratio for multi-infeed AC/DC power systems[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2008，28(31)：1-8． doi:10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2008.31.001
20	辛焕海，章枫，于洋，等．多馈入直流系统广义短路比：定义与理论分析[J]．中国电机工程学报，2016，36(3)：633-647．
	XIN H H， ZHANG F， YU Y，et al ．Generalized short circuit ratio for multi-infeed DC systems：definition and theoretical analysis[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2016，36(3)：633-647．
21	郭小江，汤涌，郭强，等．CIGRE多馈入直流短路比指标影响因素及机理[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2012，40(9)：69-74． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3415.2012.09.012
	GUO X J， TANG Y， GUO Q，et al ．Influence factors and theory for CIGRE MISCR index[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2012，40(9)：69-74． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3415.2012.09.012
22	辛焕海，董炜，袁小明，等．电力电子多馈入电力系统的广义短路比[J]．中国电机工程学报，2016，36(22)：6013-6027．
	XIN H H， DONG W， YUAN X M，et al ．Generalized short circuit ratio for multi power electronic based devices infeed to power systems[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2016，36(22)：6013-6027．
23	林伟芳，汤涌，郭小江．多馈入交直流系统短路比影响因素分析[J]．电网技术，2011，35(8)：64-68．
	LIN W F， TANG Y， GUO X J ．Analysis of influencing factors of short circuit ratio of multi-infeed AC/DC power systems[J]．Power System Technology，2011，35(8)：64-68．
24	陈程，汪炜将，王佳，等．多馈入交直流系统广义短路比的影响因素分析[J]．电力学报，2017，32(3)：200-205．
	CHEN C， WANG W J， WANG J，et al ．Analysis of influencing factors of generalized short circuit ratio of multi-infeed AC/DC system[J]．Journal of Electric Power，2017，32(3)：200-205．
25	孙华东，徐式蕴，许涛，等．新能源多场站短路比定义及指标[J]．中国电机工程学报，2021，41(2)：497-506．
	SUN H D， XU S Y， XU T，et al ．Definition and index of short circuit ratio for multiple renewable energy stations[J]．Proceedings of the CSEE，2021，41(2)：497-506．
26	毕天姝，李景一．基于聚合短路比的大型风场次同步振荡风险初筛[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2019，47(5)：52-59． doi:10.7667/PSPC181311
	BI T S， LI J Y ．Risk screening of SSO induced in large-scale wind farms based on aggregated short circuit ratio[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2019，47(5)：52-59． doi:10.7667/PSPC181311

[1]	Xinrong YAN, Ningning ZHANG, Kuichao MA, Chao WEI, Shuai YANG, Binbin PAN. Overview of Current Situation and Trend of Offshore Wind Power Development in China [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 1-12.
[2]	Shuai XU, Yufei YANG, Ao GANG, Yuetao XIE, Xiaoming ZHANG, Gongpeng LIU. Research on Key Technologies and Industrial Chain Cooperation Paths of Floating Offshore Wind Power Between China and Europe [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 13-23.
[3]	Jinzhao WANG, Gangui YAN, Kan LIU. Research on Model Reduction of Direct Drive Wind Farm Subsynchronous Oscillation Analysis Based on Alternating Direction Implicit Balanced Truncation Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 850-858.
[4]	Wenhu JIA, Qunjie XU. Research Progress of Anti-Corrosion Technology for Offshore Wind Power Facilities [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 703-711.
[5]	Caixin SUN, Bo ZHANG, Wei TANG, Yiming ZHOU, Mingzhi FU, Meng QIN, Xiaojiang GUO. Research and Practice on Localization of Offshore Wind Turbines [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(5): 696-702.
[6]	Ronghui WU, Dong LIU, Ye YU, Kailong MU, Lanhao ZHAO. Two-Way Fluid-Structure Interaction Numerical Simulation Method for Offshore Wind Power Based on Immersed Boundary Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(1): 44-52.
[7]	Yiming ZHOU, Shu YAN, Xin LIU, Bo ZHANG, Yutong GUO, Xiaojiang GUO. Summary of Offshore Wind Support Structure Integrated Design in China [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(1): 36-43.
[8]	Xiaoming LIU, Zukuang TAN, Zhenhua YUAN, Yutian LIU. Comprehensive Optimization of Access Point Selection for Offshore Wind Farm Integrated With Voltage Source Converter High Voltage Direct Current [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(6): 892-900.
[9]	Hui DONG, Weichun GE, Shitan ZHANG, Chuang LIU, Shuai CHU. Summary of Differences Between Hydrogen Production From Offshore Wind Power and Direct Outward Transmission of Electric Energy [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(6): 869-879.
[10]	Xiaotong GAO, Zhilong QIN, Xinyu GAO. Reliability Evaluation of Multi-Energy Generation and Transmission System With Offshore Wind Power-Photovoltaic-Energy Storage [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 626-635.
[11]	Xiaoyang ZOU, Weiguo PAN. Research Progress on Dynamic Simulation Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 249-259.
[12]	Jianing ZHU, Shitan ZHANG, Weichun GE, Chuang LIU, Shuai CHU. Overview of Offshore Wind Power Transmission and Power Transportation Technology [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 236-248.
[13]	Bin XU, Shuai XUE, Houlei GAO, Fang PENG. Development Status and Prospects of Offshore Wind Farms and It’s Key Technology [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 227-235.
[14]	Danmei HU, Li ZENG, Yunhao CHEN. Analysis of Fluid-Structure Coupling Characteristics of Semi-submersible Offshore Wind Turbines [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 218-226.
[15]	Xuelin LI, Ling YUAN. Development Status and Suggestions of Hydrogen Production Technology by Offshore Wind Power [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 198-206.