发电技术

• •    下一篇

锂离子电池储能热管理系统比较与经济性分析研究

李伟航1,石千磊1,曲涛2,李京鲲2,黄东永2,张志鸿1,朱晓庆1,巨星1   

  1. 1.新型储能技术北京实验室(华北电力大学),北京市 昌平区 102206;2.嘉实多(上海)管理有限公司,上海市 浦东新区 201206
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(52476196);BP嘉实多研究项目(BP Castrol-NCEPU-01)。

Comparison and Economic Analysis of Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Thermal Management System

LI Weihang1, SHI Qianlei1, QU Tao2, LI Jingkun2, HUANG Dongyong2, ZHANG Zhihong1, ZHU Xiaoqing1, JU Xing1   

  1. 1. Beijing Laboratory of New Energy Storage Technology (North China Electric Power University), Beijing 102206, Changping District, China; 2. Castrol (Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, Pudong New Area, China

摘要:

【目的】储能热管理技术迭代速度快,近来主流公司产品采用的冷却方式已由风冷过渡为间接液冷,同时浸没液冷技术正在从示范迈向应用。但目前对于浸没液冷在经济性等方面的优势尚无论文进行较为深入的讨论,因此对3种常见热管理系统进行对比分析。【方法】针对性选取了重量/体积成组效率、温升/温差和运维过程等指标,对比了不同热管理系统的差异。基于对储能系统的调研,建立了考量储能热管理系统特征的经济性模型,纳入电池容量衰减的影响;对比了成本,净现值,动态投资回收期,内部收益率,并对指标的参数敏感性进行了分析。【结果】在长期运行情况下,同规模储能电站中应用浸没液冷的系统在内部收益率上对比间接液冷系统增加了3.2%,对比浸没液冷系统增加了9.1%,且在市场发生波动的情况下能保持稳定收益率。【结论】储能系统的收益率对于峰谷电价差敏感,且浸没液冷在市场波动的情况下收益更为稳定。结果可为储能电站建设运营提供参考。

关键词:

"> 储能电站, 锂离子电池, 电化学储能, 热管理系统, 浸没液冷, 经济性分析

Abstract:

[Objectives] The energy storage thermal management technology is iterating rapidly, and the cooling method used by mainstream companies has recently transitioned from air cooling to indirect liquid cooling, while submerged liquid cooling technology is moving from demonstration to application. However, the advantages of immersion liquid cooling in economy and other aspects have not been discussed in depth. Therefore, this paper compares three common thermal management systems and compares the differences of different thermal management systems by selecting indicators such as weight/volume group efficiency, temperature rise/temperature difference and operation and maintenance process. [Methods] Based on the investigation of the energy storage system, an economic model was established to consider the characteristics of the energy storage thermal management system, including the impact of battery capacity attenuation, and compared the cost, net present value, dynamic investment payback period, and internal rate of return. The parameter sensitivity of the index was analyzed. [Results] Under long-term operation, the internal rate of return of the system applying immersion liquid cooling in the same scale energy storage power station increased by 3.2% compared with the indirect liquid cooling system and 9.1% compared with the immersion liquid cooling system, and it can maintain a stable rate of return in the case of market fluctuations. [Conclusions] The yield of energy storage systems is sensitive to the difference between peak and valley electricity prices, and the yield of submerged liquid cooling is more stable in the event of market fluctuations. The results can provide reference for the construction and operation of energy storage power stations.

Key words:

text-align:justify, ">  , energy storage power station, lithium ion battery, electrochemical energy storage, thermal management system, immersion cooling, economic analysis