Optimal Configuration of Distributed Generation Considering Carbon Trading and Reactive Power Compensation

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.22069

Abstract

Abstract:

Under the background of “double carbon”, the introduction of carbon trading and reactive power compensation mechanism in the planning of distributed generation is an important means to realize the low-carbon and stability of power system. Therefore, a optimal configuration method of distributed generation considering carbon trading and reactive power compensation was proposed. Firstly, the carbon trading mechanism was introduced to establish the calculation model of carbon trading cost. Then, a two-tier optimal configuration model of distributed generation considering carbon trading and reactive power compensation was established. The upper layer took the annual comprehensive cost as the optimization objective, and the decision variables were the location and capacity of photovoltaic and gas turbine connected to the distribution network. The lower layer took the system network loss, voltage offset and node voltage stability as the optimization objectives. The decision variables were the location and capacity of the reactive power compensation capacitor in the distribution network. Finally, the optimal configuration model was solved by the improved adaptive genetic algorithm. Combined with the example of IEEE33 node structure, the simulation analysis was carried out. The results show that the model can effectively reduce the loss of network and improve the stability of system voltage on the basis of ensuring the economy and environmental protection of the system.

Key words: carbon trading mechanism, reactive power compensation, distributed generation, adaptive genetic algorithm, optimal configuration

CLC Number:

TK 73

Jianhao SUN, Zhuang CHU. Optimal Configuration of Distributed Generation Considering Carbon Trading and Reactive Power Compensation[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 142-150.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1 Solution flow chart

Fig. 2 Node system diagram

Tab. 1 Simulation data

参数	数值
运行年限 $Y$ /a	20
年等值回报率 $r$ /(元/a)	0.1
外购单位电价 $γ$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	0.5
年最大负荷损耗时间 $T l o s s$ /h	3 200
年最大负荷利用时间 $T m a x$ /h	5 000
单位电量无偿碳排放配额 $η$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.613
外购单位电量碳排放强度 $δ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.841
微型燃气轮机碳排放强度 $μ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.184
燃气轮机单位电量无偿碳排放配额 $λ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.342
无功补偿装置投资(运行)成本 $C c (C c h)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	60(10)
光伏投资(运行)成本 $C P V (C P V M)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	6 500(70)
燃气轮机投资(运行)成本 $C M T (C M T M)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	1 500(11.8)

Tab. 1 Simulation data

参数	数值
运行年限 $Y$ /a	20
年等值回报率 $r$ /(元/a)	0.1
外购单位电价 $γ$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	0.5
年最大负荷损耗时间 $T l o s s$ /h	3 200
年最大负荷利用时间 $T m a x$ /h	5 000
单位电量无偿碳排放配额 $η$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.613
外购单位电量碳排放强度 $δ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.841
微型燃气轮机碳排放强度 $μ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.184
燃气轮机单位电量无偿碳排放配额 $λ$ /[kg/(kW⋅h)]	0.342
无功补偿装置投资(运行)成本 $C c (C c h)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	60(10)
光伏投资(运行)成本 $C P V (C P V M)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	6 500(70)
燃气轮机投资(运行)成本 $C M T (C M T M)$ /[元/(kW⋅h)]	1 500(11.8)

Tab. 2 Node voltage stability margin sequence table

次序	节点	电压稳定裕度/pu	次序	节点	电压稳定裕度/pu
1	19	0.642 93	18	8	0.766 07
2	18	0.646 98	19	27	0.778 78
3	17	0.649 96	20	7	0.785 60
4	16	0.656 40	21	6	0.799 30
5	33	0.659 43	22	26	0.883 91
6	15	0.661 40	23	5	0.885 98
7	32	0.662 16	24	25	0.908 94
8	31	0.668 82	25	4	0.923 78
9	14	0.669 20	26	24	0.925 45
10	13	0.678 40	27	23	0.939 54
11	30	0.686 73	28	22	0.959 25
12	29	0.698 04	29	3	0.960 76
13	12	0.700 59	30	21	0.961 07
14	11	0.706 35	31	20	0.969 05
15	10	0.711 72	32	2	0.984 63
16	28	0.730 40	33	1	1.000 00
17	9	0.736 24

Tab. 3 Optimized configuration results under different schemes

方案	外购电容量/kW	光伏		燃气轮机		网损/kW	碳排放量/t	成本/万元						总成本/ 万元
方案	外购电容量/kW	节点	容量/ kW	节点	容量/ kW	网损/kW	碳排放量/t	光伏	燃气轮机	无功补偿	网损	负荷电费	碳交易	总成本/ 万元
1	3 927	—	—	—	—	211.92	16 191.89	0	0	0	33.91	928.75	362.21	1 324.87
2	2 988	14	30	16	350	93.48	13 133.46	2.5	14.85	0	14.95	723.75	0	756.05
2	2 988	30	20	31	420	93.48	13 133.46	2.5	14.85	0	14.95	723.75	0	756.05
3	2 985	14	310	16	70	90.76	12 592.54	52.52	3.6	0	14.52	723.75	78.22	872.61
3	2 985	30	320	31	120	90.76	12 592.54	52.52	3.6	0	14.52	723.75	78.22	872.61
4	2 972	12	290	17	80	77.19	12 436.01	52.52	3.6	10.81	12.35	723.75	65.87	868.82
4	2 972	28	340	31	110	77.19	12 436.01	52.52	3.6	10.81	12.35	723.75	65.87	868.82

Tab. 4 Final double-layer optimal configuration results

类型	节点	容量
光伏	12	290 kW
光伏	28	340 kW
燃气轮机	17	80 kW
燃气轮机	31	110 kW
无功补偿装置	13	170 kV⋅A
	14	70 kV⋅A
	15	70 kV⋅A
	16	110 kV⋅A
	17	130 kV⋅A
	18	20 kV⋅A
	19	210 kV⋅A
	29	190 kV⋅A
	30	210 kV⋅A
	31	290 kV⋅A
	32	280 kV⋅A
	33	70 kV⋅A

Fig. 3 Node voltage comparison diagram

Fig. 4 Comparison of voltage offset and stability margin

Fig. 5 Comparison curve of algorithm convergence

Tab. 5 Comparison results of algorithm optimization

参数	改进的自适应遗传算法	传统的遗传算法
求解时间/s	128.3	245.7
迭代收敛次数	98	124
总成本/万元	868.82	874.94

References 22

1	杨晓辉，杨爽，徐正宏，等．计及灵活配电单元的分布式电源优化配置方法[J]．电力工程技术，2023，42(1)：19-25．
	YANG X H， YANG S， XU Z H，et al ．Optimal configuration method of distributed generation considering flexible distribution unit[J]．Electric Power Engineering Technology，2023，42(1)：19-25．
2	初壮，孙健浩，赵蕾，等．考虑风光与负荷时序特性的主动配电网分布式电源优化配置[J]．电力建设，2022，43(11)：53-62． doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.11.006
	CHU Z， SUN J H， ZHAO L，et al ．Optimal configuration of distributed power generation in active distribution network considering the characteristics of wind power and load time series[J]．Electric Power Construction，2022，43(11)：53-62． doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.11.006
3	蔡浩，施凯，唐静，等．基于改进蚁狮优化算法的可再生能源分布式电源优化配置[J]．电测与仪表，2022，59(11)：88-95．
	CAI H， SHI K， TANG J，et al ．Optimal configuration of renewable energy distributed power generation based on improved ant-lion optimization algorithm[J]．Electrical Measurement ＆ Instrumentation，2022，59(11)：88-95．
4	刘建伟，李学斌，刘晓鸥．有源配电网中分布式电源接入与储能配置[J]．发电技术，2022，43(3)：476-484． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21068
	LIU J W， LI X B， LIU X O ．Distributed power access and energy storage configuration in active distribution network[J]．Power Generation Technology，2022，43(3)：476-484． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21068
5	肖永江，于永进，张桂林．基于改进乌燕鸥算法的分布式电源优化配置[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2022，50(3)：148-155．
	XIAO Y J， YU Y J， ZHANG G L ．Optimal configuration of distributed power generation based on an improved sooty tern optimization algorithm[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2022，50(3)：148-155．
6	刘强，刘佩，马少飞，等．基于灰狼优化算法的分布式电源定容选址研究[J]．智慧电力，2018，46(11)：40-46． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2018.11.007
	LIU Q， LIU P， MA S F，et al ．Sitting and sizing of distributed generation based on grey wolf optimization algorithm[J]．Smart Power，2018，46(11)：40-46． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2018.11.007
7	马天祥，段昕，卢志刚，等．计及供电可靠性评估的地区电网风储电站选址定容方法[J]．智慧电力，2021，49(7)：36-43． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2021.07.007
	MA T X， DUAN X， LU Z G，et al ．Optimal siting and sizing method of wind storage power station in regional power grid considering power supply reliability assessment[J]．Smart Power，2021，49(7)：36-43． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2021.07.007
8	李洪志，杨俊友，崔嘉．考虑网损和电压的多分布式电源最优选址和定容研究[J]．电气工程学报，2015，10(9)：79-86． doi:10.11985/2015.09.013
	LI H Z， YANG J Y， CUI J ．Optimal location and sizing of multi-distributed generators considering power loss and voltage[J]．Journal of Electrical Engineering，2015，10(9)：79-86． doi:10.11985/2015.09.013
9	姚慧芳，李勇，谭益，等．考虑电量外送的多电压等级电网分布式电源优化配置方法[J]．电力系统保护与控制，2019，47(19)：54-62．
	YAO H F， LI Y， TAN Y，et al ．Optimal allocation of distributed generations considering power export in multi-voltage level grid[J]．Power System Protection and Control，2019，47(19)：54-62．
10	刘杨华，杨悦荣，林舜江．含光伏配电网中储能和无功补偿装置协调的多目标凸优化配置方法[J]．电力科学与技术学报，2023，38(5)：22-33．
	LIU Y H， YANG Y R， LIN S J ．A multi-object convex optimization method for the coordinated allocation of energy storage and reactive power compensation devices in distribution network integrated with photovoltaics[J]．Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology，2023，38(5)：22-33．
11	周春泉，史静，姜相明，等．计及无功优化的分布式电源选址与定容[J]．现代电力，2014，31(2)：42-45． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2322.2014.02.008
	ZHOU C Q， SHI J， JIANG X M，et al ．Sitting and sizing of distribution generation by considering of reactive power optimization[J]．Modern Electric Power，2014，31(2)：42-45． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2322.2014.02.008
12	胡臻，崔挺，呙虎，等．考虑电网动态特性的无功补偿配置方案[J]．电力系统及其自动化学报，2019，31(10)：45-51． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8930.2019.10.007
	HU Z， CUI T， GUO H，et al ．Reactive power compensation scheme considering dynamic characteristics of power system[J]．Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA，2019，31(10)：45-51． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8930.2019.10.007
13	徐慧慧，田云飞，缪猛，等．计及碳交易和需求响应的虚拟电厂低碳经济调度[J]．智慧电力，2023，51(8)：1-7． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2023.08.001
	XU H H， TIAN Y F， MIAO M，et al ．Low carbon economy dispatch of virtual power plants considering carbon trading and demand response[J]．Smart Power，2023，51(8)：1-7． doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7598.2023.08.001
14	娄素华，胡斌，吴耀武，等．碳交易环境下含大规模光伏电源的电力系统优化调度[J]．电力系统自动化，2014，38(17)：91-97． doi:10.7500/AEPS20140508005
	LOU S H， HU B， WU Y W，et al ．Optimal dispatch of power system integrated with large scale photovoltaic generation under carbon trading environment[J]．Automation of Electric Power Systems，2014，38(17)：91-97． doi:10.7500/AEPS20140508005
15	车泉辉，吴耀武，祝志刚，等．基于碳交易的含大规模光伏发电系统复合储能优化调度[J]．电力系统自动化，2019，43(3)：76-82． doi:10.7500/AEPS20180113002
	CHE Q H， WU Y W， ZHU Z G，et al ．Carbon trading based optimal scheduling of hybrid energy storage system in power systems with large-scale photovoltaic power generation[J]．Automation of Electric Power Systems，2019，43(3)：76-82． doi:10.7500/AEPS20180113002
16	张晓辉，梁军雪，赵翠妹，等．基于碳交易的含燃气机组的低碳电源规划[J]．太阳能学报，2020，41(7)：92-98．
	ZHANG X H， LIANG J X， ZHAO C M，et al ．Research on low-carbon power planning with gas turbine units based on carbon transactions[J]．Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica，2020，41(7)：92-98．
17	骆钊，秦景辉，梁俊宇，等．含碳-绿色证书联合交易机制的综合能源系统日前优化调度[J]．电力自动化设备，2021，41(9)：248-255．
	LUO Z， QIN J H， LIANG J Y，et al ．Day-ahead optimal scheduling of integrated energy system with carbon-green certificate coordinated trading mechanism[J]．Electric Power Automation Equipment，2021，41(9)：248-255．
18	吴鸿亮，刘羽霄，张宁，等．南方电网西电东送中的碳交易模型及其效益分析[J]．电网技术，2017，41(3)：745-751．
	WU H L， LIU Y X， ZHANG N，et al ．Carbon trading models and benefit analysis in CSG west-to-east power transmission[J]．Power System Technology，2017，41(3)：745-751．
19	孙子茹，艾芊，居来提·阿不力孜，等．考虑季节性氢储及期货式碳交易的综合能源系统年度规划研究[J]．中国电力，2022，55(8)：2-13．
	SUN Z R， AI Q， JULAITI A，et al ．Annual planning study of integrated energy system considering seasonal hydrogen storage and futures carbon trading[J]．Electric Power，2022，55(8)：2-13．
20	柯清派，史训涛，袁智勇，等．基于改进遗传算法的变电站巡检机器人路径规划[J]．电测与仪表，2023，60(8)：144-149．
	KE Q P， SHI X T， YUAN Z Y，et al ．Route planning for substation patrol robot based on improved genetic algorithm[J]．Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation，2023，60(8)：144-149．
21	赵国钦，蓝茂蔚，李杨，等．基于最小二乘支持向量机的火电厂烟气含氧量预测模型优化研究[J]．发电技术，2023，44(4)：534-542． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21088
	ZHAO G Q， LAN M W， LI Y，et al ．Study on optimization of prediction model of flue gas oxygen content in thermal power plant based on least squares support vector machine[J]．Power Generation Technology，2023，44(4)：534-542． doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21088
22	王新宇，王相杰，张明月，等．基于改进自适应免疫遗传算法的智能电网虚假数据攻击检测方法[J]．浙江电力，2023，42(10)：84-89．
	WANG X Y， WANG X J， ZHANG M Y，et al ．A false data attack detection method for power grid based on an improved AIGA[J]．Zhejiang Electric Power，2023，42(10)：84-89．

[1]	Hongbo LIU, Shencheng LIU, Xueyang GAI, Yongfa LIU, Yutong YAN. Overview of Active Distribution Network Planning With High Proportion of New Energy Access [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 151-161.
[2]	Yi CHEN, Yingxin XU, Dongjie XU, Xiang GAO. Optimal Configuration and Performance Analysis of Terminal Multi-energy Complementary System [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(6): 823-833.
[3]	Rangda DUAN. A Post-evaluation Index System of Active Distribution Network Project and Its Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 86-93.
[4]	Si GU, Xiao SUN, Chang MA, Jing CHEN. Improved Power Flow Algorithm for Distributed Ring Network Based on Loop Analysis [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(6): 675-680.
[5]	Wei FANG,Bo ZENG,Fuqiang XU,Jianhua ZHANG. Evaluation on Load Restoration of Distribution System Based on Distributed Generation in Smart Buildings After Extreme Disasters [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40(5): 440-447.