Power Generation Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 163-170.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21139
• Power Generation and Environmental Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jiaqi PENG1, Haiping XIAO1, Zhuyu DONG1, Baomin SUN1, Ling BAI2, Zhichun SUN2
Received:
2022-04-27
Published:
2023-04-30
Online:
2023-04-28
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Jiaqi PENG, Haiping XIAO, Zhuyu DONG, Baomin SUN, Ling BAI, Zhichun SUN. Data-driven NO x Stability Evaluation[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(2): 163-170.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.pgtjournal.com/EN/10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21139
工况 | 区间占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
全负荷 | 78.34 | 94.10 | 98.29 |
稳负荷 | 78.49 | 94.10 | 98.29 |
升负荷 | 76.73 | 94.39 | 98.59 |
降负荷 | 77.33 | 93.67 | 98.14 |
Tab. 1 NO x concentration deviation proportion in different intervals
工况 | 区间占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
全负荷 | 78.34 | 94.10 | 98.29 |
稳负荷 | 78.49 | 94.10 | 98.29 |
升负荷 | 76.73 | 94.39 | 98.59 |
降负荷 | 77.33 | 93.67 | 98.14 |
工况 | 区间占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 88.23 | 96.46 | 98.51 |
70%负荷 | 78.47 | 95.34 | 99.10 |
50%负荷 | 77.84 | 94.44 | 97.52 |
Tab. 2 Distribution of NO x concentration deviation under three typical working conditions
工况 | 区间占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
100%负荷 | 88.23 | 96.46 | 98.51 |
70%负荷 | 78.47 | 95.34 | 99.10 |
50%负荷 | 77.84 | 94.44 | 97.52 |
工况 | 全负荷 | 稳负荷 | 升负荷 | 降负荷 |
---|---|---|---|---|
得分 | 89.00 | 89.09 | 87.80 | 88.68 |
Tab. 3 NO x stability grade under different working conditions
工况 | 全负荷 | 稳负荷 | 升负荷 | 降负荷 |
---|---|---|---|---|
得分 | 89.00 | 89.09 | 87.80 | 88.68 |
负荷率/% | 100 | 70 | 50 |
---|---|---|---|
得分 | 98.78 | 94.03 | 87.50 |
Tab. 4 NO x stability grade under steady load at different load rates
负荷率/% | 100 | 70 | 50 |
---|---|---|---|
得分 | 98.78 | 94.03 | 87.50 |
1 | 黄权浩,赵光耀,兰艳旭,等 .脱硝系统流场优化在330 MW机组上的实践[J].浙江电力,2021,40(8):102-106. |
HUANG Q H, ZHAO G Y, LAN Y X,et al .The practice of flow field optimization in denitration system of a 330 MW unit[J].Zhejiang Electric Power,2021,40(8):102-106. | |
2 | 冯前伟,张杨,王丰吉,等 .燃煤机组SCR脱硝超低排放改造前后性能对比分析[J].中国电机工程学报,2020,40(20):6644-6653. |
FENG Q W, ZHANG Y, WANG F J,et al .Performance comparison and analysis before and after SCR ultra-low emission transformation of coal-fired units[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2020,40(20):6644-6653. | |
3 | 李子尚,朱仁涵,杜振 .SCR脱硝系统精准喷氨优化技术分析[J].发电技术,2021,42(5):630-636. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20035 |
LI Z S, ZHU R H, DU Z .Analysis on the optimization technology of precise ammonia injection in SCR denitration system[J].Power Generation Technology,2021,42(5):630-636. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20035 | |
4 | 卢志民,李文庆,廖永进,等 .基于影响因子的SCR脱硝系统喷氨量优化模拟[J].中国电机工程学报,2021,41(14):4923-4930. |
LU Z M, LI W Q, LIAO Y J,et al .Influential factors-based optimization simulation of ammonia injection in SCR DeNO x system[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2021,41(14):4923-4930. | |
5 | 周智健,王信,常剑,等 .660 MW燃煤电厂SCR脱硝系统CFD模拟优化研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2021,41(19):6688-6699. |
ZHOU Z J, WANG X, CHANG J,et al .CFD simulation and optimization of SCR DeNO x system in a 660 MW coal-fired power plant[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2021,41(19):6688-6699. | |
6 | YE J D, LV J S, TAN D L,et al .Numerical analysis on enhancing spray performance of SCR mixer device and heat transfer performance based on field synergy principle[J].Processes,2021,9(5):786. doi:10.3390/pr9050786 |
7 | 赵征,李悦宁,袁洪 .燃煤机组NO x 生成量动态软测量模型[J].动力工程学报,2020,40(7):523-529. |
ZHAO Z, LI Y N, YUAN H .Dynamic model for soft sensing of NO x generation in coal-fired units[J].Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering,2020,40(7):523-529. | |
8 | 张媛媛,曲江源,王鹏程,等 .超低负荷循环流化床机组NO x 超低排放的GA-BP算法优化模型[J].热力发电,2021,50(12):35-42. |
ZHANG Y Y, QU J Y, WANG P C,et al .Optimization model of GA-BP algorithm for ultra-low NO x emission of ultra-low loaded CFB units[J].Thermal Power Generation,2021,50(12):35-42. | |
9 | 范江,张双平,孟宇,等 .660 MW燃煤机组瞬态过程NO x 生成及脱除特性[J].发电技术,2020,41(5):527-535. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20038 |
FAN J, ZHANG S P, MENG Y,et al .Characteristics of NO x formation and removal in the transient process of a 660 MW coal-fired power unit[J].Power Generation Technology,2020,41(5):527-535. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20038 | |
10 | LEE Y J, JUNG K T, LEE H C .Use of gaze entropy to evaluate situation awareness in emergency accident situations of nuclear power plant[EB/OL].(2021-10-22)[2022-02-01].. |
022 | . doi:10.1023/a:1010650624155 |
11 | 张渤苓,王一然,王露露,等 .燃煤发电职业危害暴露健康负担评价方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(11):179-185. |
ZHANG B L, WANG Y R, WANG L L,et al .Method of health burden assessment on occupational hazard exposure in coal-fired power generation[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2021,17(11):179-185. | |
12 | 张兴平,何澍,王泽嘉,等 .不同新能源渗透率下燃煤机组行为策略分析[J].电力建设,2022,43(5):9-17. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.05.002 |
ZHANG X P, HE S, WANG Z J,et al .Behavior strategy of coal-fired units under different new energy penetration rate[J].Electric Power Construction,2022,43(5):9-17. doi:10.12204/j.issn.1000-7229.2022.05.002 | |
13 | ZHAO Y J, DUAN Y Y, LIU Q,et al .Life cycle energy-economy-environmental evaluation of coal-based CLC power plant vs.IGCC,USC and oxy-combustion power plants with/without CO2 capture[J].Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2021,9(5):106121. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106121 |
14 | 邓成刚,陈宇明,陈坤,等 .50 MW超临界二氧化碳燃煤电厂热经济性分析[J].热力发电,2021,50(12):160-168. |
DENG C G, CHEN Y M, CHEN K,et al .Thermoeconomic analysis for 50 MW supercritical carbon dioxide coal-fired power plant[J].Thermal Power Generation,2021,50(12):160-168. | |
15 | 刘柱光,方樟,丁小凡 .燃煤电厂贮灰场土壤重金属污染及健康风险评价[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(9):1916-1922. |
LIU Z G, FANG Z, DING X F .Heavy metal pollution and health risk assessment of soil in ash yard of coal-fired power plant[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2021,30(9):1916-1922. | |
16 | 王彦哲,周胜,王宇,等 .中国核电和其他电力技术环境影响综合评价[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2021,61(4):377-384. |
WANG Y Z, ZHOU S, WANG Y,et al .Comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of China’s nuclear and other power generation technologies[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology),2021,61(4):377-384. | |
17 | ZHANG S, MA Z, ZHANG H,et al .Multicriterion benefit evaluation methodology for safety enhancements in nuclear power plants and application for FLEX strategies[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2021,376:111135. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111135 |
18 | 段穰达 .有源配网后评价指标体系及其综合评价方法[J].发电技术,2021,42(1):86-93. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20102 |
DUAN R D .A post-evaluation index system of active distribution network project and its comprehensive evaluation method[J].Power Generation Technology,2021,42(1):86-93. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20102 | |
19 | 张江丰,孙坚栋,苏烨,等 .基于熵权-密切值法的机组一次调频性能综合评价方法[J].汽轮机技术,2020,62(4):309-313. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5884.2020.04.018 |
ZHANG J F, SUN J D, SU Y,et al .Comprehensive evaluation method for unit primary frequency regulation performance based on entropy weight-osculating value method[J].Turbine Technology,2020,62(4):309-. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5884.2020.04.018 | |
313 | . doi:10.1023/a:1010650624155 |
20 | 王凯,崔志刚,鲁恩龙,等 .基于AHP-可变模糊集理论的抽水蓄能电站灌浆质量综合评价[J].电网与清洁能源,2021,37(5):61-66. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2021.05.008 |
WANG K, CUI Z G, LU E L,et al .Comprehensive evaluation of grouting quality of the pumped-storage power station based on AHP-variable fuzzy set theory[J].Power System and Clean Energy,2021,37(5):61-66. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2021.05.008 | |
21 | 王磊,姜涛,宋丹,等 .基于灵活热电比的区域综合能源系统多目标优化调度[J].电力系统保护与控制,2021,49(8):151-159. |
WANG L, JIANG T, SONG D,et al .Multi-objective optimal dispatch of a regional integrated energy system based on a flexible heat-to-electric ratio[J].Power System Protection and Control,2021,49(8):151-159. | |
22 | 中国环境科学研究院 . 火电厂大气污染物排放标准: [S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012. |
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences . Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants: [S].Beijing:China Environmental Science Press,2012. | |
23 | GUO Y Y, SUN Y C, LI L B,et al .Reliability assessment for multi-source data of mechanical parts of civil aircraft based on the model[J].Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology,2019,33(7):3205-3211. doi:10.1007/s12206-019-0615-4 |
24 | 吕晓磊 .基于火电厂热力设备特征的大数据应用技术研究[D].济南:山东大学,2021. |
LV X L .Research on application technology of big data based on characteristics of thermal equipment in thermal power plant[D].Jinan:Shandong University,2021. | |
25 | 唐军,周冰,文里梁,等 .工业生产过程数据稳定性评价方法的适应性研究[J].工业工程,2020,23(6):131-137. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2020.06.018 |
TANG J, ZHOU B, WEN L L,et al .A study of adaptability of different statistical methods for stability assessment of complex industrial data[J].Industrial Engineering Journal,2020,23(6):131-137. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2020.06.018 |
[1] | Quanbin ZHANG, Qiongfang ZHOU. Research on the Development Path of China’s Thermal Power Generation Technology Based on the Goal of “Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization” [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(2): 143-154. |
[2] | Xiufeng YAN, Ke ZONG, Xiunian HE, Lin GAO, Bin QIN, Mingkun WANG, Wentao HUI. Research on Steam Temperature Control Strategy in Peak Regulation of 1 000 MW Coal Power Unit [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(3): 518-522. |
[3] | Qianwei FENG, Renhan ZHU, Sida XU, Bo LIU, Yang ZHANG, Fengji WANG, Yue ZHU. Performance Evaluation and Analysis of Key Parameters of SCR Ultra-low Emission for 1 000 MW Coal-fired Unit [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1): 168-174. |
[4] | Jing WANG, Jinfu YANG, Liqiang DUAN, Liguo TIAN, Yutian JING, Ming YANG. Optimal Design of Steam Turbine System for Advanced Ultra-supercritical Double Reheat Coal-fired Units [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(4): 480-488. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||