Power Generation Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 313-319.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21006
• Smart Grid • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhong XU1, Le LUAN1, Wenxiong MO1, Simin LUO1, Zonglin YE2, Chao CHEN2, Xuanda LAI2, Minghui XIE2
Received:
2021-06-30
Published:
2022-04-30
Online:
2022-05-13
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Zhong XU, Le LUAN, Wenxiong MO, Simin LUO, Zonglin YE, Chao CHEN, Xuanda LAI, Minghui XIE. Distribution Transformer Outage Prediction Based on Logistic Fast Minimum Error Entropy Algorithm[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 313-319.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.pgtjournal.com/EN/10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.21006
样本数量 | 平均运行时间/s | 最快运行时间/s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
最小误差熵 | 快速最小 误差熵 | 最小误差熵 | 快速最小 误差熵 | |
100 | 103.89 | 0.040 1 | 77.77 | 0.015 6 |
200 | 384.31 | 0.058 0 | 310.05 | 0.031 2 |
300 | 801.52 | 0.076 9 | 654.21 | 0.046 8 |
400 | 1 430.61 | 0.100 0 | 1 254.12 | 0.046 8 |
500 | 2 306.24 | 0.110 4 | 2 072.50 | 0.062 4 |
Tab. 1 Running time of two algorithms for Gaussian error
样本数量 | 平均运行时间/s | 最快运行时间/s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
最小误差熵 | 快速最小 误差熵 | 最小误差熵 | 快速最小 误差熵 | |
100 | 103.89 | 0.040 1 | 77.77 | 0.015 6 |
200 | 384.31 | 0.058 0 | 310.05 | 0.031 2 |
300 | 801.52 | 0.076 9 | 654.21 | 0.046 8 |
400 | 1 430.61 | 0.100 0 | 1 254.12 | 0.046 8 |
500 | 2 306.24 | 0.110 4 | 2 072.50 | 0.062 4 |
序号 | 标准化后的重过载时长 | 最大有功负载率/% | 平均有功负载率/% | 平均三相不平衡度/% | 标准化后的重三相不平衡度 | 模型输出结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 74.98 | 78.06 | 52.60 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 0.010 53 | 87.14 | 46.89 | 20.17 | 17.570 000 | 1 |
3 | 0.125 70 | 131.58 | 32.45 | 38.16 | 0.012 300 | 0 |
4 | 0.025 96 | 97.10 | 29.74 | 23.15 | 0.001 366 | 0 |
5 | 0.083 33 | 123.86 | 35.80 | 35.15 | 0.002 732 | 0 |
Tab. 2 Sample of feature variable data in training set
序号 | 标准化后的重过载时长 | 最大有功负载率/% | 平均有功负载率/% | 平均三相不平衡度/% | 标准化后的重三相不平衡度 | 模型输出结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 74.98 | 78.06 | 52.60 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 0.010 53 | 87.14 | 46.89 | 20.17 | 17.570 000 | 1 |
3 | 0.125 70 | 131.58 | 32.45 | 38.16 | 0.012 300 | 0 |
4 | 0.025 96 | 97.10 | 29.74 | 23.15 | 0.001 366 | 0 |
5 | 0.083 33 | 123.86 | 35.80 | 35.15 | 0.002 732 | 0 |
序号 | 标准化后的重过载时长 | 最大有功 负载率/% | 平均有功 负载率/% | 平均三相 不平衡度/% | 标准化后的重三相不平衡度 | 实际停电情况 | 模型预测输出 | 输出停电概率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.095 62 | 115.92 | 31.37 | 34.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
2 | 0.019 13 | 97.14 | 25.38 | 26.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
3 | 0.062 84 | 125.54 | 35.19 | 32.72 | 0.120 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
4 | 0.124 50 | 136.80 | 31.84 | 31.84 | 0.019 91 | 1 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
5 | 0.278 70 | 95.22 | 100.90 | 34.27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 0 |
Tab. 3 Partial prediction results in test set
序号 | 标准化后的重过载时长 | 最大有功 负载率/% | 平均有功 负载率/% | 平均三相 不平衡度/% | 标准化后的重三相不平衡度 | 实际停电情况 | 模型预测输出 | 输出停电概率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.095 62 | 115.92 | 31.37 | 34.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
2 | 0.019 13 | 97.14 | 25.38 | 26.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
3 | 0.062 84 | 125.54 | 35.19 | 32.72 | 0.120 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
4 | 0.124 50 | 136.80 | 31.84 | 31.84 | 0.019 91 | 1 | 0 | 0.000 0 |
5 | 0.278 70 | 95.22 | 100.90 | 34.27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 0 |
算法 | 错误率 | F测量 |
---|---|---|
Logistic快速最小熵算法 | 0.118 5 | 0.877 2 |
Tab. 4 Evaluation of prediction results of Logistic fast minimum entropy algorithm
算法 | 错误率 | F测量 |
---|---|---|
Logistic快速最小熵算法 | 0.118 5 | 0.877 2 |
1 | 尤田柱,鄢志平 .配电网安全防护技术[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2015:125-128. |
YOU T Z, YAN Z P .Distribution network security protection technology[M].Beijing:China Electric Power Press,2015:125-128. | |
2 | 刘建伟,李学斌,刘晓鸥 .有源配电网中分布式电源接入与储能配置[J/OL].发电技术:1-9[2022-02-14].. |
LIU J W, LI X B, LIU X O .Distributed generation access and energy storage configuration in active distribution network[J/OL].Power Generaton Technology:1-9[2022-02-14].. | |
3 | 张志华,刘健,程林,等 .基于串联电抗器的城市配电线路全线速断保护[J].智慧电力,2020,48(1):111-117. doi:10.1109/spies48661.2020.9243102 |
ZHANG Z H, LIU J, CHENG L,et al .The whole line quick-trip protection of city distribution line based on series reactor allocation[J].Smart Power,2020,48(1):111-117. doi:10.1109/spies48661.2020.9243102 | |
4 | 宋云亭,张东霞,吴俊玲,等 .国内外城市配电网供电可靠性对比分析[J].电网技术,2008,32(23):13-18. |
SONG Y T, ZHANG D X, WU J L,et al .Analysis of big data technology in power distribution system and typical applications[J].Power System Technology,2008,32(23):13-18. | |
5 | 张坤,党东升,马艳霞,等 .主动式配电网电源分区布点规划关键技术研究[J].电网与清洁能源,2020,36(3):42-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2020.03.007 |
ZHANG K, DANG D S, MA Y X,et al .Research on key technologies of power supply distribution zones planning for active distribution network[J].Power System and Clean Energy,2020,36(3):42-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2020.03.007 | |
6 | 肖勇,陆文升,李云涛,等 .城市配电网发展形态指标体系及其评估方法研究[J].电力系统保护与控制,2021,49(1):62-71. |
XIAO Y, LU W S, LI Y T,et al .Research on index system and its evaluation methods of urban distribution network development form[J].Power System Protection and Control,2021,49(1):62-71. | |
7 | 胡丽娟,刁赢龙,刘科研,等 .基于大数据技术的配电网运行可靠性分析[J].电网技术,2017,41(1):265-271. doi:10.1109/cyberc.2018.00042 |
HU L J, DIAO Y L, LIU K Y,et al .Operational reliability analysis of distribution network based on big data technology[J].Power System Technology,2017,41(1):265-271. doi:10.1109/cyberc.2018.00042 | |
8 | 费思源 .大数据技术在配电网中的应用综述[J].中国电机工程学报,2018,38(1):85-96. |
FEI S Y .Overview of application of big data technology in power distribution system[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2018,38(1):85-96. | |
9 | 冷华,童莹,李欣然,等 .配电网运行状态综合评估方法研究[J].电力系统保护与控制,2017,45(1):53-59. |
LENG H, TONG Y, LI X R,et al .Comprehensive evaluation method research of the operation state in distributed network[J].Power System Protection and Control,2017,45(1):53-59. | |
10 | 段穰达 .有源配网后评价指标体系及其综合评价方法[J].发电技术,2021,42(1):86-93. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20102 |
DUAN R D .A post-evaluation index system of active distribution network project and its comprehensive evaluation method[J].Power Generation Technology,2021,42(1):86-93. doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20102 | |
11 | 李延真,郭英雷,彭博,等 .基于多时间尺度状态估计的配电网实时态势预测[J].电力工程技术,2020,39(2):127-134. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2020.02.018 |
LI Y Z, GUO Y L, PENG B,et al .Real-time situation prediction of distribution network based on multi-time scale state estimation[J].Electric Power Engineering Technology,2020,39(2):127-134. doi:10.12158/j.2096-3203.2020.02.018 | |
12 | 邢晓敏,徐海瑞,廖孟柯,等 .基于云模型和D-S证据理论的配电终端健康状态综合评估方法[J].电力系统保护与控制,2021,49(13):72-81. |
XING X M, XU H R, LIAO M K,et al .Comprehensive evaluation method of distribution terminal units health status based on cloud model and D-S evidence theory[J].Power System Protection and Control,2021,49(13):72-81. | |
13 | 蒋碧莺,荣建,张军 .Logistic分类算法下的配电网故障识别技术研究[J].电工技术,2018(24):70-71. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1388.2018.24.032 |
JIANG B Y, RONG J, ZHANG J .Research on fault identification technology of distribution network based on logistic classification algorithm[J].Electric Engineering,2018(24):70-71. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1388.2018.24.032 | |
14 | 陈颖,刘冰倩,朱淑娟,等 .极端气象条件下配电网大范围停电贝叶斯网络建模和停电概率预测方法[J].供用电,2019,36(7):30-34. |
CHEN Y, LIU B Q, ZHU S J,et al .Bayesian network modeling and power outage probability prediction method for largescale power outages in distribution networks under extreme weather conditions[J].Distribution & Utilization,2019,36(7):30-34. | |
15 | 侯慧,耿浩,肖祥,等 .台风灾害下用户停电区域预测及评估[J].电网技术,2019,43(6):1948-1954. |
HOU H, GENG H, XIAO X,et al. Research on prediction and evaluation of user power outage area under typhoon disaster[J].Power System Technology,2019,43(6):1948-1954. | |
16 | 严道波,杨勇,邱丹,等 .基于天气因素和XGBoost算法的配电线路故障停电预测[J].电力与能源,2019,40(2):168-171. |
YAN D B, YANG Y, QIU D,et al .Failure prediction of distribution line based on weather factors and XGBoost algorithm[J].Power and Energy,2019,40(2):168-171. | |
17 | MENSAH A F, DUENAS-OSORIO L .Outage predictions of electric power systems under Hurricane winds by Bayesian networks[C]//International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.Durham,UK:IEEE,2014:1-6. doi:10.1109/pmaps.2014.6960677 |
18 | WANIK D W, PARENT J R, ANAGNOSTOU E N,et al .Using vegetation management and LiDAR-derived tree height data to improve outage predictions for electric utilities[J].Electric Power Systems Research,2017,146:236-245. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2017.01.039 |
19 | PRINCIPE JOSÉ C .Information theoretic learning:renyi's entropy and kernel perspectives[M].Berlin:Springer Publishing Company,2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1570-2 |
20 | RENYI A .On measures of entropy and information[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics,Statistics and Probability.Berkeley,USA:University of California 1,1960:158-174. |
21 | WEIDEMANN H, STEAR E .Entropy analysis of estimating systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.1970,16(3):264-270. doi:10.1109/tit.1970.1054444 |
22 | Thomas M C, Thomas J A .信息论基础[M].阮吉寿,张华,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2005. |
THOMAS M C, THOMAS J A .Elements of information theory[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2005. | |
23 | WALLACE D L .Asymptotic approximations to distributions[J].Annals of Mathematical Statistics.1958,29(3):635-654. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706528 |
24 | HU T, WU Q, ZHOU D X .Convergence of gradient descent for minimum error entropy principle in linear regression[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,2016,64(12):6571-6579. doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2612169 |
[1] | Xiangyu WANG, Wuhui CHEN, Xiaolong GUO, Xiqiang CHANG. Review of Research on the Digitalization of Power Generation System [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 120-141. |
[2] | Hongbo LIU, Shencheng LIU, Xueyang GAI, Yongfa LIU, Yutong YAN. Overview of Active Distribution Network Planning With High Proportion of New Energy Access [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 151-161. |
[3] | Yeqing ZHANG, Wenbin CHEN, Lüjun XU, Xingwen JIANG. Multi-Virtual Power Plant-Oriented Dynamic Aggregation Control Strategy Based on Hierarchical Partition and Multi-Layer Complementation [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 162-169. |
[4] | Minghui KE, Lin LAI. Experimental Research of Electrogasdynamic Power Generation With Exposed Electrode Structure Based on Normal Temperature Air [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 180-188. |
[5] | Ruowei WANG, Yinxuan LI, Weichun GE, Shitan ZHANG, Chuang LIU, Shuai CHU. Summary of Desert Photovoltaic Power Transmission Technology [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 32-41. |
[6] | Anan ZHANG, Qi ZHOU, Qian LI, Ning DING, Chao YANG, Yan MA. Research Status and Prospect of CO2 Accounting Technology in Thermal Power Plants Under the Goal of Dual Carbon [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 51-61. |
[7] | Daijun CHEN, Lili CHEN, Yangtao LI. Electrical Power Output Prediction of Combined Cycle Power Station [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(1): 99-105. |
[8] | Xingyuan XU, Haoyong CHEN, Yuxiang HUANG, Xiaobin WU, Yushen WANG, Junhao LIAN, Jianbin ZHANG. Challenges, Strategies and Key Technologies for Virtual Power Plants in Market Trading [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 745-757. |
[9] | Songyuan YU, Junsong ZHANG, Zhiwei YUAN, Fang FANG. Resilience Enhancement Strategy of Combined Heat and Power-Virtual Power Plant Considering Thermal Inertia [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 758-768. |
[10] | Zhenyu ZHAO, Xinxin LI. Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch Based on Ladder Carbon Trading Virtual Power Plant Considering Carbon Capture Power Plant and Power-to-Gas [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 769-780. |
[11] | Zhonghao QIAN, Jun HU, Sichen SHEN, Ting QIN, Hanyi MA, Xiaodong WANG, Caoyi FENG, Zhinong WEI. Multi-Power Coordinated Optimization Operation Strategy Considering Conditional Value at Risk [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 781-789. |
[12] | Xiaoqiang JIA, Yongbiao YANG, Jiao DU, Haiqing GAN, Nan YANG. Study on Uncertainty Operation Optimization of Virtual Power Plant Based on Intelligent Prediction Model Under Climate Change [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 790-799. |
[13] | Jun JIA, Weihao FAN, Zhipeng LÜ, Jianguang YAO, Shan ZHOU, Jian WANG, Jintao ZHANG. Research on Startup of DC Transformer for Electric Vehicle Cluster Grid-Connection [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 875-882. |
[14] | Yu FENG, Youbin SONG, Sheng JIN, Jiahuan FENG, Xuechen SHI, Yongjie YU, Xianchao HUANG. Improved Deep Learning Model for Forecasting Short-Term Load Based on Random Forest Algorithm and Rough Set Theory [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 889-895. |
[15] | He HUANG, Yan WANG, Nian JIANG, Qiang WU, Yajing ZHANG, Xiuyuan YANG. Optimal Control of Residents’ Controllable Load Resources Considering Different Demands of Users [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2023, 44(6): 896-908. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||