Power Generation Technology ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 697-705.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.19131
• Power Generation and Enviromental Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
Kejia HU1(), Jun ZHANG1, Tianyu ZHANG2, Lixin GAO3(
)
Received:
2020-01-03
Published:
2020-12-31
Online:
2021-01-12
Supported by:
短路容量 | 谐波次数 | |||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
国标6kV基准短路 容量100MV?A | 43 | 34 | 21 | 34 | 14 | 24 |
本模型6 kV最小短路容量 200 MV?A修正值 | 86 | 68 | 42 | 68 | 28 | 48 |
国标110 kV基准短路容量 750 MV?A(220 kV最小短路 容量2 000 MV?A同等参照) | 12.0 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 6.8 |
Tab. 1 Allowed harmonic values of current
短路容量 | 谐波次数 | |||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
国标6kV基准短路 容量100MV?A | 43 | 34 | 21 | 34 | 14 | 24 |
本模型6 kV最小短路容量 200 MV?A修正值 | 86 | 68 | 42 | 68 | 28 | 48 |
国标110 kV基准短路容量 750 MV?A(220 kV最小短路 容量2 000 MV?A同等参照) | 12.0 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 6.8 |
电网标称电压/kV | 电压总谐波畸变率/% |
6 | 4 |
110(220kV同等参照) | 2 |
Tab. 2 Threshold of total distortion rate of harmonic voltage
电网标称电压/kV | 电压总谐波畸变率/% |
6 | 4 |
110(220kV同等参照) | 2 |
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 5309 |
2次谐波 | 0.89 | 47.25 |
3次谐波 | 0.23 | 12.21 |
4次谐波 | 0.11 | 5.84 |
5次谐波 | 0.07 | 3.72 |
6次谐波 | 0.03 | 1.59 |
7次谐波 | 0.04 | 2.12 |
Tab. 3 Higher harmonic values of current waveform at t1=(0.20, 0.30)s
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 5309 |
2次谐波 | 0.89 | 47.25 |
3次谐波 | 0.23 | 12.21 |
4次谐波 | 0.11 | 5.84 |
5次谐波 | 0.07 | 3.72 |
6次谐波 | 0.03 | 1.59 |
7次谐波 | 0.04 | 2.12 |
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 2 979 |
2次谐波 | 1.22 | 36.34 |
3次谐波 | 0.68 | 20.26 |
4次谐波 | 0.54 | 16.09 |
5次谐波 | 0.36 | 10.72 |
6次谐波 | 0.30 | 8.94 |
7次谐波 | 0.26 | 7.75 |
Tab. 4 Higher harmonic values of current waveform at t2=(3.00, 3.10) s
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 2 979 |
2次谐波 | 1.22 | 36.34 |
3次谐波 | 0.68 | 20.26 |
4次谐波 | 0.54 | 16.09 |
5次谐波 | 0.36 | 10.72 |
6次谐波 | 0.30 | 8.94 |
7次谐波 | 0.26 | 7.75 |
谐波次数 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 947.8 |
2次谐波 | 0.18 | 1.71 |
3次谐波 | 0.06 | 0.57 |
4次谐波 | 0.05 | 0.47 |
5次谐波 | 0.04 | 0.38 |
6次谐波 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
7次谐波 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
Tab. 5 Higher harmonic values of current waveform at t3=(9.00, 9.10) s
谐波次数 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 947.8 |
2次谐波 | 0.18 | 1.71 |
3次谐波 | 0.06 | 0.57 |
4次谐波 | 0.05 | 0.47 |
5次谐波 | 0.04 | 0.38 |
6次谐波 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
7次谐波 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 2207 |
2次谐波 | 0.42 | 9.27 |
3次谐波 | 0.21 | 4.63 |
4次谐波 | 0.08 | 1.77 |
5次谐波 | 0.05 | 1.10 |
6次谐波 | 0.04 | 0.88 |
7次谐波 | 0.03 | 0.66 |
Tab. 6 Higher harmonic value of current waveform at t1=(0.20, 0.30)s after adding reactor
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 2207 |
2次谐波 | 0.42 | 9.27 |
3次谐波 | 0.21 | 4.63 |
4次谐波 | 0.08 | 1.77 |
5次谐波 | 0.05 | 1.10 |
6次谐波 | 0.04 | 0.88 |
7次谐波 | 0.03 | 0.66 |
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 212.2 |
2次谐波 | 5.36 | 11.37 |
3次谐波 | 1.04 | 2.21 |
4次谐波 | 0.65 | 1.38 |
5次谐波 | 0.39 | 0.83 |
6次谐波 | 0.32 | 0.68 |
7次谐波 | 0.35 | 0.74 |
Tab. 7 Higher harmonic value of current waveform at t1=(0.20, 0.30)s when SFC connecting between generator terminal and 220 kV main transformer
谐波 | 占比率/% | 有效电流/A |
基波 | 100 | 212.2 |
2次谐波 | 5.36 | 11.37 |
3次谐波 | 1.04 | 2.21 |
4次谐波 | 0.65 | 1.38 |
5次谐波 | 0.39 | 0.83 |
6次谐波 | 0.32 | 0.68 |
7次谐波 | 0.35 | 0.74 |
1 | 蒋洪德, 任静, 李雪英, 等. 重型燃气轮机机现状与发展趋势[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34 (29): 5096- 5098. |
JIANG H D , REN J , LI X Y , et al. Status and development trend of the heavy duty gas turbine[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34 (29): 5096- 5098. | |
2 |
曹亮. SFC谐波滤波器的设计及应用[J]. 电工技术, 2017, 22 (4): 56- 57.
DOI |
CAO L . Design and application of SFC harmonic filter[J]. Electric Engineering, 2017, 22 (4): 56- 57.
DOI |
|
3 | 曾令华, 程亮, 张靖宗. 交流变频调速系统仿真建模及谐波特性分析[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40 (3): 294- 299. |
ZENG L H , CHENG L , ZHANG J Z . Simulation model of AC variable frequency speed regulation system and harmonic characteristics analysis[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40 (3): 294- 299. | |
4 | 宿清华.抽水蓄能电站SFC装置谐波分析及抑制措施研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2002. |
SU Q H.Research on harmonic analysis and suppression measures of SFC device in pumped storage power station[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2002. | |
5 |
王炜, 谭锦文, 颛孙旭, 等. 高渗透率并网风力发电的谐波特点及其抑制研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2018, 34 (9): 59- 66.
DOI |
WANG W , TAN J W , ZHUANG S X , et al. Study on harmonic characteristics and suppression of high-permeability grid-connected wind power generation[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2018, 34 (9): 59- 66.
DOI |
|
6 | 宋波. 谐波影响下电力电容器的协调无功降损方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2019, 35 (11): 7- 12. |
SONG B . A method of coordinated reactive power loss reduction for power capacitors under the influence of harmonics[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2019, 35 (11): 7- 12. | |
7 | 鲁勇勤, 况明伟, 李宇俊, 等. 燃机变频启动系统技术引进和创新开发设计[J]. 东方电气评论, 2009, 23 (4): 43- 48. |
LU Y Q , Kuang M W , Li Y J , et al. Technical transfer and innovative design for SFC system of gas turbine generator units[J]. Dongfang Electric Review, 2009, 23 (4): 43- 48. | |
8 | ABB.LCI基本原理及应用[Z].Zurich, Switzerland: ABB, 2016. |
ABB.LCI principle and application[Z].Zurich, Switzerland: ABB, 2016. | |
9 | 李发海, 王岩. 电机与拖动基础[M]. 4版 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012. |
LI F H , WANG Y . Fundamentals of electrical machines and drives[M]. 4th ed Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012. | |
10 | 王兆安, 刘进军. 电力电子技术[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2000. |
WANG Z A , LIU J J . Power electronics[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2000. | |
11 | 全国电压电流等级和频率标准化技术委员会.电能质量公用电网谐波: GB/T 14549-1993[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 1993. |
National Technical Committee for Standard Voltages, Current Ratings and Frequencies.Quality of electric energy supply harmonics in public supply network: GB/T 14549-1993[S].Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1993. | |
12 | 龚静, 张巧杰. 有源电力滤波器半矢量预测控制策略研究[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40 (5): 462- 468. |
GONG J , ZHANG Q J . Research on semi-vector predictive control strategy of active power filter[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40 (5): 462- 468. | |
13 | 孙锦, 方超, 曹亮. 变频器输入电抗器及直流滤波电容器的设计[J]. 应用科技, 2014, 41 (2): 16- 20. |
SUN J , FANG C , CAO L . Research on the design of input reactor and DC filer capacitor for frequency converter[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2014, 41 (2): 16- 20. | |
14 | 袁国刚, 饶柱石. 基于振动分析法的变压器非电量状态监测与诊断研究[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40 (2): 134- 140. |
YUAN G G , RAO Z S . Review of non-electrical quantity monitoring and fault diagnosis for power transformer on vibration analysis method[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40 (2): 134- 140. | |
15 | 李养俊, 何子春, 张强, 等. 火力发电厂电能质量测试与评估分析[J]. 发电技术, 2018, 39 (2): 135- 139. |
LI Y J , HE Z C , ZHANG Q , et al. Test and evaluation of power quality in thermal power plant[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2018, 39 (2): 135- 139. |
[1] | Linghua ZENG,Liang CHENG,Jingzong ZHANG. Simulation Model of AC Variable Frequency Speed Regulation System and Harmonic Characteristics Analysis [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40(3): 294-299. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 387
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 170
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||