Power Generation Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 383-394.DOI: 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.260215

• Virtual Power Plant • Previous Articles    

Electric Vehicle Charging Guidance Strategy Considering User Decision Preferences

Hengjie LI1, Zunkang ZHANG1, Yun ZHOU2, Donghan FENG2, Xiping MA3   

  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and Information Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
    2.Key Laboratory of Control of Power Transmission and Conversion, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China
    3.Electric Power Research Institute, State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu Province, China
  • Received:2025-04-12 Revised:2026-06-20 Published:2026-04-30 Online:2026-04-21
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(52167014)

Abstract:

Objectives During the electric vehicle (EV) charging guidance process, users have different preferences in selecting charging stations, resulting in different selection criteria, which affects their participation in optimal scheduling. Therefore, considering user habits in selecting charging stations and the conflicts of interest between users and charging aggregators, an EV charging guidance strategy that incorporates target charging station selection habits is proposed. Methods Self-organizing feature mapping (SOFM) is used for user profiling, and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are utilized to determine the optimal profiling results. Secondly, the entropy weight method is applied to determine the weights of time cost and economic cost for each type of user during the charging station selection process. Based on the weight results, user economic cost and time cost are normalized into user satisfaction. Then, users are guided to charge based on their user satisfaction. Results The example shows that compared with the shortest path The numerical example shows that compared with the shortest path algorithm, this strategy significantly improves user satisfaction in selecting charging stations and the profit per unit time of charging piles. Additionally, this strategy is less affected under different traffic conditions. Conclusions This strategy effectively addresses the impact of user charging decision preferences on charging guidance, which is of great significance for improving user charging benefits and reducing charging congestion.

Key words: electric vehicle (EV), decision preferences, user profiling, charging guidance, economic cost, time cost, satisfaction

CLC Number: