有源配网后评价指标体系及其综合评价方法

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20102

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

配网项目后评价通过对项目的全面总结评价，可以起到总结经验、吸取教训、提高配电网项目建设质量及配电项目决策水平的作用。在分布式电源大量接入配网，配电网结构、运行控制等均发生了变化的背景下，为了达到提高配电网项目建设质量及配电项目决策水平的目的，对传统配网评估指标体系进行了优化，新增或修正了相应评估指标，建立了适合有源配电网工程后评价的指标体系，并给出与之相适应的模糊综合评价方法。最后通过算例验证了该指标体系及评价方法的可行性与优越性。

关键词: 有源配电网, 后评价, 分布式电源, 模糊综合评价

Abstract:

Post-evaluation of distribution network project can be used to sum up experience, learn lessons and improve the decision-making level through the comprehensive evaluation of the whole project. With a large number of distributed power sources accessing the distribution network in recent years, the structure and operation control of the distribution network have changed. In order to improve the construction quality of distribution network project and the decision-making level of distribution project, the traditional distribution network evaluation index system was optimized, corresponding evaluation indexes were added or modified, an index system suitable for the post-evaluation of active distribution network project was established. The corresponding fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed. Finally, the feasibility and superiority of the index system and evaluation method were verified by an example.

Key words: active distribution network, post-evaluation, distributed generation, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

TK01
TM726

段穰达. 有源配网后评价指标体系及其综合评价方法[J]. 发电技术, 2021, 42(1): 86-93.

Rangda DUAN. A Post-evaluation Index System of Active Distribution Network Project and Its Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 86-93.

图/表 6

参考文献 28

1	张勇军, 刘子文, 邓丰强. 柔性互联配电网研究现状综述及其发展探索[J]. 广东电力, 2020, 33 (12): 3- 13.
	ZHANG Y J , LIU Z W , DENG F Q . Review on research status and development of flexible interconnected distribution networks[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2020, 33 (12): 3- 13.
2	邢晓敏, 何铁新, 吴卓, 等. 配电网运行状态评估递阶模型构建及评价方法研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2019, 47 (4): 81- 86.
	XIANG X M , HE T X , WU Z , et al. Construction of hierarchical model and evaluation method for distribution network operation status evaluation[J]. Smart Power, 2019, 47 (4): 81- 86.
3	赵骞, 张肖, 汪鸿, 等. 融入区块链理念的配电网数据池构建方法研究[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40 (6): 540- 547.
	ZHAO Q , ZHANG X , WANG H , et al. Research on construction method of distribution network data pool integrating block chain concept[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40 (6): 540- 547.
4	徐璐, 熊天军, 杨素, 等. 计及新电改政策的配电网变化影响因素及其规划方法综述[J]. 智慧电力, 2020, 48 (9): 108- 117.
	XU L , XIONG T J , YANG S , et al. Survey of distribution network change factors & planning methods under new electricity reform policy[J]. Smart Power, 2020, 48 (9): 108- 117.
5	陈兢, 周哲, 方敏. 基于层次分析法及灰色聚类决策模型的主动配电网经济活动外部性评价[J]. 浙江电力, 2020, 39 (5): 88- 92.
	CHEN J , ZHOU Z , FANG M . Externality evaluation of active distribution network economic activities based on analytic hierarchy process and grey clustering decision model[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2020, 39 (5): 88- 92.
6	杨磊, 任健. 基于层次分析法的燃煤发电企业低碳综合评价[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40 (1): 66- 70.
	YANG L , REN J . Low carbon comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40 (1): 66- 70.
7	李强年, 赵巧妮, 聂龑. 基于层次分析法(AHP)的风电产业发展影响因素探析: 以甘肃省酒泉风力发电基地为例[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2019, 35 (10): 75- 81.
	LI Q N , ZHAO Q N , NIE Y . Research on the factors affecting the development of wind power industry based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP): taking Jiuquan wind power generation base in Gansu province as an example[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2019, 35 (10): 75- 81.
8	WIND Y , SAATY T L . Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Management Science, 1980, 26 (7): 641- 658. DOI
9	SAATY T L . Mathematical modeling of dynamic decisions; priorities and hierarchies with time dependence[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1979, 21 (4): 352- 358. DOI
10	RN X U , ZHAI X Y . Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1992, 52 (3): 251- 257.
11	HECKLER C E . Applied multivariate statistical analysis[J]. Technometrics, 2005, 47 (4): 517.
12	BONNIE J M . Closing the assessment loop using pre- and post-assessment[J]. Reference Services Review, 2011, 39 (2): 244- 259. DOI
13	黄德春, 许长新. 投资项目后评价的现有理论及评析[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31 (6): 105- 108.
	HUANG D C , XU C X . Comments on theory of post-evaluation of investment projects[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2003, 31 (6): 105- 108.
14	查健禄, 田钦谟, 李盛德. 综合评价问题的系统分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2000, 15 (2): 124- 130.
	CHA J L , TIAN Q M , LI S D , et al. Systematic analysis of problem in comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2000, 15 (2): 124- 130.
15	冯圣洪, 周心权. 一种综合评价指标属性值规一量化技术新途径[J]. 系统工程学报, 2000, 15 (2): 187- 191.
	FENG S H , ZHOU X Q . A new way to normalize attribute-value of integrating assessment-indicators[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2000, 15 (2): 187- 191.
16	方嵩, 彭嵩, 赵晋泉, 等. DG启动及运行特性综合评价指标与方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2018, 56 (14): 5- 11.
	FANG S , PENG S , ZHAO J , et al. Comprehensive evaluation index and method for DGs' startup and operation characteristics[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2018, 56 (14): 5- 11.
17	冯磊, 李楠, 顾洁, 等. 多元主体下有源配电网规划方案协同评估研究[J]. 供用电, 2019, 36 (8): 7- 15.
	FENG L , LI N , GU J , et al. Research on collaborative evaluation of active distribution network planning based on multi-stakeholder[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2019, 36 (8): 7- 15.
18	熊剑峰. 基于AHP法与FCE法的主动配电网现状网架综合评价体系与方法的研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2017.
	XIONG J F.Research on comprehensive evaluation system and method of active distribution network frame based on AHP and FCE method[D].Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2017.
19	陈雪, 黄伟, 叶琳浩, 等. 基于多源数据的配电网规划辅助决策系统研究[J]. 广东电力, 2017, 30 (1): 53- 58.
	CHEN X , HUANG W , YE L H , et al. Study on auxiliary decision system for power distribution network planning based on multisource data[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2017, 30 (1): 53- 58.
20	彭丽霖. 主动配电网下分布式能源系统规划运行及效益评价研究[D]. 保定: 华北电力大学, 2017.
	PENG L L.Research on planning, operation and benefit evaluation of distributed energy system under active distribution network[D].Baoding: North China Electric Power University, 2017.
21	黄晓娟. 基于多目标层次分析法的输变电项目后评价体系研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2014.
	HUANG X J.Research on post-evaluation system of power transmission and transformation project based on multi-objective AHP[D].Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2014.
22	杨波. 10 kV及以下配网建设与改造投资后评价指标体系研究[J]. 南方电网技术, 2009, 3 (s1): 8- 14.
	YANG B . Study on post-project evaluation index system for 10 kV and below distribution network investment[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2009, 3 (s1): 8- 14.
23	吕雷. 输变电项目后评价因素权重的确定[J]. 煤炭技术, 2010, 29 (8): 35- 37.
	LÜ L . Determining the weight of factors in power transmission project post-project evaluation[J]. Coal Technology, 2010, 29 (8): 35- 37.
24	何滢. 配电网项目后评价研究及应用[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2012.
	HE Y.Research and application of post evaluation of distribution network project[D].Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2012.
25	白恒远, 潘凯岩, 王森, 等. 基于拉格朗日函数的配电网评价指标权重研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2019, 56 (8): 1- 8.
	BAI H Y , PAN K Y , WANG S , et al. Research of comprehensive quantitative evaluation index system and determination of weights of distribution network operation mode[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2019, 56 (8): 1- 8.
26	贺静, 苏卫华. 中压配电网关键评价指标体系研究[J]. 供用电, 2010, 27 (3): 26- 28, 39.
	HE J , SU W H . Study on key evaluation index system about middle-voltage distribution network[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2010, 27 (3): 26- 28.
27	谢季坚, 刘承平. 模糊数学方法及其应用[M]. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 2005: 143- 161.
	XIE J J , LIU C P . Fuzzy mathematics method and its application[M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Technology Press, 2005: 143- 161.
28	兰继斌, 徐扬, 霍良安, 等. 模糊层次分析法权重研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006, 26 (9): 109- 114.
	LAN J B , XU Y , HUO L A , et al. Research on the priorities of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2006, 26 (9): 109- 114.

指标	隶属度	指标	隶属度
A11	(1, 0.2, 0, 0, 0)	B56	(1, 0.7, 0.5, 0, 0)
A12	(1, 0.2, 0, 0, 0)	C11	(1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A13	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	C12	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)
A2	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)	C21	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)
A31	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)	C22	(0.4, 0.7, 0.3, 0, 0)
A32	(0, 0, 0.4, 1, 0.4)	C23	(0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0, 0)
A33	(0.1, 0.7, 0.2, 0, 0)	C24	(0.1, 0.9, 0.1, 0, 0)
A34	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	C25	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)
A35	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)	C31	(0.1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A36	(0.1, 0.9, 0.1, 0, 0)	C32	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)
A41	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)	C41	(1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A42	(0.2, 0.5, 0.2, 0.1, 0)	C42	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)
B1	(0.1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)	C43	(0, 1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1)
B2	(0, 0.9, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1)	C44	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)
B3	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)	C45	(0.5, 0.6, 0.4, 0, 0)
B4	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)	C46	(0.6, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0)
B51	(0.2, 1, 0.2, 0, 0)	C47	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)
B52	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)	C5	(0.7, 0.3, 0.2, 0, 0)
B53	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	D11	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)
B54	(0, 0, 0.4, 1, 0.4)	D12	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)
B55	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)	D2	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)

指标	隶属度	指标	隶属度
A11	(1, 0.2, 0, 0, 0)	B56	(1, 0.7, 0.5, 0, 0)
A12	(1, 0.2, 0, 0, 0)	C11	(1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A13	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	C12	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)
A2	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)	C21	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)
A31	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)	C22	(0.4, 0.7, 0.3, 0, 0)
A32	(0, 0, 0.4, 1, 0.4)	C23	(0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0, 0)
A33	(0.1, 0.7, 0.2, 0, 0)	C24	(0.1, 0.9, 0.1, 0, 0)
A34	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	C25	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)
A35	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)	C31	(0.1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A36	(0.1, 0.9, 0.1, 0, 0)	C32	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)
A41	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)	C41	(1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)
A42	(0.2, 0.5, 0.2, 0.1, 0)	C42	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)
B1	(0.1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1, 0)	C43	(0, 1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1)
B2	(0, 0.9, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1)	C44	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)
B3	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)	C45	(0.5, 0.6, 0.4, 0, 0)
B4	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)	C46	(0.6, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0)
B51	(0.2, 1, 0.2, 0, 0)	C47	(1, 0.7, 0.4, 0, 0)
B52	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)	C5	(0.7, 0.3, 0.2, 0, 0)
B53	(0.3, 1, 0.3, 0, 0)	D11	(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0, 0)
B54	(0, 0, 0.4, 1, 0.4)	D12	(0.1, 0.8, 0.1, 0, 0)
B55	(0.5, 0.7, 0.5, 0.1, 0)	D2	(0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.3, 0)

指标	下层指标权向量	指标	下层指标权向量
A1	(0.4, 0.3, 0.3)	C2	(0.20, 0.19, 0.245, 0.26, 0.11)
A3	(0.3, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1)	C3	(0.5, 0.5)
A4	(0.6, 0.4)	C4	(0.1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1)
A	(0.26, 0.475, 0.055, 0.21)	C	(0.16, 0.175, 0.255, 0.21, 0.2)
B5	(0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.35)	D1	(0.667, 0.333)
B	(0.09, 0.21, 0.25, 0.26, 0.19)	D	(0.5, 0.5)
C1	(0.5, 0.5)	G	(0.21, 0.26, 0.247, 0.287)

指标	下层指标权向量	指标	下层指标权向量
A1	(0.4, 0.3, 0.3)	C2	(0.20, 0.19, 0.245, 0.26, 0.11)
A3	(0.3, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1)	C3	(0.5, 0.5)
A4	(0.6, 0.4)	C4	(0.1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1)
A	(0.26, 0.475, 0.055, 0.21)	C	(0.16, 0.175, 0.255, 0.21, 0.2)
B5	(0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.35)	D1	(0.667, 0.333)
B	(0.09, 0.21, 0.25, 0.26, 0.19)	D	(0.5, 0.5)
C1	(0.5, 0.5)	G	(0.21, 0.26, 0.247, 0.287)

评价指标	模糊评价矩阵	评分
实施过程	(0.42, 0.34, 0.20, 0.04, 0.00)	82.5
经济效益	(0.04, 0.49, 0.33, 0.13, 0.01)	68.2
配网性能	(0.30, 0.43, 0.23, 0.04, 0.00)	79.8
社会影响及可持续性	(0.25, 0.30, 0.33, 0.12, 0.00)	73.8
综合评价	(0.24, 0.39, 0.28, 0.09, 0.00)	75.6